IP Library Granted Patent US 9,201,769
Granted Patent B2
US 9,201,769 · App. 14/314,773 · Granted Dec 1, 2015

Progressive black-box testing of computer software applications

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,201,769
App. No.
14/314,773
Granted
Dec 1, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Testing computer software applications by performing a first black-box test on a computer software application, identifying any instructions of the computer software application that were reached by a payload of the first black-box test, determining a degree of success of the first black-box test in accordance with predefined success criteria, determining whether any of the instructions that were reached by the payload changed after performing the first black-box test, deciding whether to perform a second black-box test on the computer software application, where the deciding whether to perform the second black-box test is based on whether any of the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test changed after performing the first black-box test, and the degree of success of the first black-box test.

Claims (21)

1. A method for testing computer software applications, the method comprising:

performing, via a black-box tester, a first black-box test on a computer software application;

identifying any instructions of the computer software application that were reached by based on a payload of the first black-box test;

determining a degree of success of the first black-box test in accordance with predefined success criteria;

monitoring coding tools used to modify the instructions of the computer software application;

monitoring the instructions of the computer software application for changes after black-box tests are performed on the computer software application;

determining, based on the monitored coding tools and the monitored instructions, whether any of the instructions that were reached by the payload changed after performing the first black-box test; and

deciding whether to perform a second black-box test on the computer software application, wherein the deciding whether to perform the second black-box test is based on: whether any of the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test changed after performing the first black-box test and the degree of success of the first black-box test, and wherein the performing, identifying, determining, and deciding steps are implemented in any of:

a) computer hardware configured to perform said steps, and

b) computer software configured to perform said steps and embodied in a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the deciding whether to perform the second black-box test is further based on whether a detected change to any of the instructions that were reached by the payload relates to a security vulnerability.

3. The method according to claim 1 and further comprising configuring the second black-box test to be identical to the first black-box test.

4. The method according to claim 3 and further comprising performing the second black-box test responsive to determining that the first black-box test failed and that any of the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test changed after performing the first black-box test.

5. The method according to claim 1 and further comprising configuring the second black-box test to include a variant of the payload used in the first black-box test, wherein both the first black-box test and the second black-box test are configured to test for the same type of behavior.

6. The method according to claim 5 and further comprising performing the second black-box test responsive to determining that the first black-box test failed and that the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test are unchanged after performing the first black-box test.

7. The method according to claim 5 and further comprising performing the second black-box test responsive to determining that the first black-box test succeeded and that the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test are unchanged after performing the first black-box test.

8. The method according to claim 5 and further comprising performing the second black-box test responsive to determining that the first black-box test succeeded and that any of the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test changed after performing the first black-box test.

9. The method according to claim 1 and further comprising:

determining whether the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test participate in a security-relevant flow; and

performing the second black-box test only if the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test participate in a security-relevant flow.

10. The method according to claim 1 and further comprising configuring the second black-box test based on a characteristic of the instructions that were reached by the payload of the first black-box test.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2019
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 050374/0781 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 25, 2014
From: TRIPP, OMER
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 033178/0153 →