IP Library Patent Application 14319786
Patent Application
App. No. 14/319,786

METHODS, SOFTWARE, AND SYSTEMS FOR SOFTWARE TESTING

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
14/319,786
Abstract

An embodiment of a method of testing software can include, as performed by at least one computing device, evaluating a first criterion for a plurality of software components, selecting a subset of the plurality of software components based on the evaluated first criterion, evaluating a second criterion for a plurality of test cases each defining a respective test to evaluate functionality of at least one of the software components, selecting a subset of the plurality of test cases based on the evaluated second criterion, and testing the selected subset of the plurality of software components utilizing the selected subset of the plurality of test cases.

Claims (83)

1 . A method of testing software, the method comprising:

evaluating, by at least one computing device, a first criterion for a plurality of software components;

selecting, by the at least one computing device, a subset of the plurality of software components based on the evaluated first criterion;

evaluating, by the at least one computing device, a second criterion for a plurality of test cases, each test case defining a respective test to evaluate functionality of at least one of the software components;

selecting, by the at least one computing device, a subset of the plurality of test cases based on the evaluated second criterion; and

testing, by the at least one computing device, the selected subset of the plurality of software components utilizing the selected subset of the plurality of test cases.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating of the first criterion includes calculating a respective index for each of the plurality of software components.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the selecting of the subset of the plurality of software components includes selecting a predetermined percentage of the plurality of software components based on the calculated indexes for the plurality of software modules.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the respective index is a function of a number of times submission of the corresponding software component has been received in a predetermined time period.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the respective index is a function of times at which submission of the corresponding software component has been received in a predetermined time period.

6 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the calculating of the respective index includes utilizing a logistic regression.

7 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the respective index is calculated according to the following formula:

index

=

i

=

1

n

1

(

1

+

-

at

i

+

b

)

;

where n is a number of times submission of the corresponding software component has been received in a predetermined time frame, t i is a normalized time of submission of the corresponding software component within the predetermined time frame, and a and b are selectable constants.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating of the second criterion includes calculating a respective index for each of the plurality of test cases.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the selecting of the subset of the plurality of test cases includes selecting a predetermined percentage of the plurality of test cases based on the calculated indexes for the plurality of test cases.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the respective index is a function of a number of times the corresponding test case has returned a failure result in a predetermined time period.

11 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the respective index is a function of times at which the corresponding test case has returned the failure result in the predetermined time period.

12 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the calculating of the respective index includes utilizing a logistic regression.

13 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the respective index is calculated according to the following formula:

index

=

i

=

1

n

1

(

1

+

-

at

i

+

b

)

;

where n is a number of times the corresponding test case has returned a failure result in a predetermined time frame, t i is a normalized time of the failure result for the corresponding test frame within the predetermined time frame, and a and b are selectable constants.

14 . A non-transitory machine-readable medium having program instructions, which when executed perform a method of testing software, the method comprising:

evaluating, by at least one computing device, a first criterion for a plurality of software components;

selecting, by the at least one computing device, a subset of the plurality of software components based on the evaluated first criterion;

evaluating, by the at least one computing device, a second criterion for a plurality of test cases, each test case defining a respective test to evaluate functionality of at least one of the software components;

selecting, by the at least one computing device, a subset of the plurality of test cases based on the evaluated second criterion; and

testing, by the at least one computing device, the selected subset of the plurality of software components utilizing the selected subset of the plurality of test cases.

15 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the evaluating of the first criterion includes calculating a respective index for each of the plurality of software components.

16 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the respective index is a function of at least one of a number of times submission of the corresponding software component has been received in a predetermined time period and times at which submission of the corresponding software component has been received in a predetermined time period.

17 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the evaluating of the second criterion includes calculating a respective index for each of the plurality of test cases.

18 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the respective index is a function of at least one of a number of times the corresponding test case has returned a failure result in a predetermined time period and times at which the corresponding test case has returned the failure result in the predetermined time period.

19 . A computing device, comprising:

a processor; and

a non-transitory machine-readable storage component having program instructions, which when executed perform a method of testing software, the method including:

evaluating a first criterion for a plurality of software components;

selecting a subset of the plurality of software components based on the evaluated first criterion;

evaluating a second criterion for a plurality of test cases, each test case defining a respective test to evaluate functionality of at least one of the software components;

selecting a subset of the plurality of test cases based on the evaluated second criterion; and

testing the selected subset of the plurality of software components utilizing the selected subset of the plurality of test cases.

20 . The computing device of claim 19 , wherein:

the evaluating of the first criterion includes calculating a respective index for each of the plurality of software components, the respective index for a corresponding software module being a function of at least one of a number of times submission of the corresponding software component has been received in a predetermined time period and times at which submission of the corresponding software component has been received in a predetermined time period, and

the evaluating of the second criterion includes calculating a respective index for each of the plurality of test cases, the respective index for a corresponding test case being a function of at least one of a number of times the corresponding test case has returned a failure result in a predetermined time period and times at which the corresponding test case has returned the failure result in the predetermined time period.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 26, 2014
From: SAP AG
To: SAP SE
Reel/Frame 033625/0223 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 19, 2014
From: DING, LI
To: SAP AG
Reel/Frame 033566/0575 →