IP Library Granted Patent US 9,316,727
Granted Patent B2
US 9,316,727 · App. 14/330,771 · Granted Apr 19, 2016

Moving-entity detection

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,316,727
App. No.
14/330,771
Granted
Apr 19, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A stepped-frequency radar signal is transmitted through a barrier. A transmitter of the stepped-frequency radar is on a first side of the barrier, a first object is on a second side of the barrier, and a second object that is distinct from the first object is on the second side of the barrier. A signal including a reflection of the transmitted signal from the first object and a reflection of the transmitted signal from the second object is sensed. The sensed signal is analyzed to determine that a first detection is associated with the first object and a second detection is associated with a second object.

Claims (62)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

obtaining, by a transceiver, multiple radar signals, each radar signal associated with a frequency;

generating, by a processor, a representation of a space that comprises a barrier that defines an interior region and an object in the interior region, the generated representation being based on a known location and orientation of the barrier relative to the object;

determining, by the processor and using the generated representation, a modeled parameter that defines reflections by the object of a radar signal that propagates through the barrier and into the interior region and irradiates at least a portion of the barrier and at least a portion of the object;

accessing, by the processor, a parameter of a candidate detection of the object, wherein the parameter of the candidate detection is determined from the multiple radar signals received by the transceiver;

comparing, by the processor, the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal to the accessed parameter of the candidate detection; and

classifying, by the processor, the candidate detection as an actual detection or a false alarm based on the comparison.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein classifying the candidate detection as an actual detection or a false alarm based on the comparison comprises:

determining based on the comparison that the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal matches the accessed parameter of the candidate detection; and

in response to determining that the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal matches the accessed parameter of the candidate detection, classifying the candidate detection as a false alarm.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein classifying the candidate detection as an actual detection or a false alarm based on the comparison comprises:

determining based on the comparison that the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal does not match the accessed parameter of the candidate detection; and

in response to determining that the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal does not match the accessed parameter of the candidate detection, classifying the candidate detection as an actual detection.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising presenting the candidate detection only when the candidate detection is classified as an actual detection.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

accessing a track that approximates a motion of an object;

determining that the candidate detection is associated with the track; and

determining that the candidate detection is an actual detection based on the association.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining that the candidate detection is an actual detection based on the association comprises:

determining that the track associated with the candidate detection is not associated with stationary clutter; and

in response to determining that the track associated with the candidate detection is not associated with stationary clutter, determining that the candidate detection is an actual detection.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameter that defines the reflections of the radar signal comprises one or more of an angle of arrival of the reflection, a range of the reflection, and a Doppler of the reflection, and

the parameter of the candidate detection comprises one or more of an angle of arrival of the candidate detection, a range of the candidate detection, and a Doppler of the candidate detection.

8. A device comprising:

a transceiver configured to receive and transmit multiple radar signals, each radar signal associated with a frequency, through a barrier and into an interior region defined by the barrier;

a processor coupled to an electronic storage, the electronic storage storing instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

generating a representation of a space that comprises the barrier and an object in the interior region defined by the barrier, the generated representation being based on a known location and orientation of the barrier relative to the object;

determining, using the generated representation, a modeled parameter that defines reflections by the object of a radar signal that propagates through the barrier and into the interior region and irradiates at least a portion of the barrier and at least a portion of the object;

accessing a parameter of a candidate detection of the object;

comparing the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal to the accessed parameter of the candidate detection; and

classifying the candidate detection as an actual detection or a false alarm based on the comparison.

9. The device of claim 8 , wherein classifying the candidate detection as an actual detection or a false alarm based on the comparison comprises:

determining based on the comparison that the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal matches the accessed parameter of the candidate detection; and

in response to determining that the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal matches the accessed parameter of the candidate detection, classifying the candidate detection as a false alarm.

10. The device of claim 8 , wherein classifying the candidate detection as an actual detection or a false alarm based on the comparison comprises:

determining based on the comparison that the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal does not match the accessed parameter of the candidate detection; and

in response to determining that the modeled parameter that defines the reflections by the object of the radar signal does not match the accessed parameter of the candidate detection, classifying the candidate detection as an actual detection.

11. The device of claim 8 , the operations further comprising presenting the candidate detection only when the candidate detection is classified as an actual detection.

12. The device of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:

accessing a track that approximates a motion of an object;

determining that the candidate detection is associated with the track; and

determining that the candidate detection is an actual detection based on the association.

13. The device of claim 12 , wherein determining that the candidate detection is an actual detection based on the association comprises:

determining that the track associated with the candidate detection is not associated with stationary clutter; and

in response to determining that the track associated with the candidate detection is not associated with stationary clutter, determining that the candidate detection is an actual detection.

14. The device of claim 8 , the operations further comprising presenting the potential target only when the candidate detection is classified as an actual target.

15. The device of claim 8 , wherein the parameter that defines the reflections of the radar signal comprises one or more of an angle of arrival of the reflection, a range of the reflection, and a Doppler of the reflection, and

the parameter of the candidate detection comprises one or more of an angle of arrival of the candidate detection, a range of the candidate detection, and a Doppler of the candidate detection.

16. A computer-implemented method comprising:

transmitting, by a transmitter, a first stepped-frequency radar signal through a barrier, wherein the transmitter is on a first side of the barrier;

sensing, by a receiver, a first signal comprising a reflection of the first transmitted signal from an object;

analyzing, by a processor, the first sensed signal to identify a first detection of the object;

transmitting, by the transmitter, a second stepped-frequency radar signal through the barrier;

sensing, by the receiver, a second signal comprising a reflection of the second transmitted signal from an object located on a second side of the barrier;

analyzing, by the processor, the second sensed signal to identify a second detection of the object;

forming a track representative of a motion of the object through a region defined by a boundary based on the first detection and the second detection;

transmitting, by the transmitter, a third stepped-frequency radar signal through the barrier;

sensing, by the receiver, a third signal from the region;

analyzing, by the processor, the third signal to identify a candidate detection;

comparing, by the processor, a parameter of the candidate detection to a parameter of at least one of the first and second detections;

determining, by the processor and based on the comparison, whether the candidate detection is a false alarm or an actual detection; and

if the candidate detection is a false alarm, presenting the first and second detections without the candidate detection, and if the candidate detection is an actual detection, presenting the first and second detections with the candidate detection.

Assignments (6)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 5, 2021
From: L3 FUZING AND ORDNANCE SYSTEMS, INC.
To: L3HARRIS FUZING AND ORDNANCE SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 058795/0611 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 3, 2020
From: L3 SECURITY & DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.)
To: L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 052312/0107 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 3, 2020
From: L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: L3 FUZING AND ORDNANCE SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 052312/0125 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 24, 2020
From: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
To: L3 SECURITY & DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 052002/0829 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2015
From: SENTELLE, CHRISTOPHER GARY; WRIGHT, DONALD CHARLES; FONTAN, FELIX M.; TORRES-ROSARIO, JUAN ANTONIO
To: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 034957/0950 →
MERGER Recorded Jul 24, 2014
From: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CYTERRA CORPORATION
To: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 033407/0624 →