IP Library Granted Patent US 9,854,966
Granted Patent B2
US 9,854,966 · App. 14/359,235 · Granted Jan 2, 2018

System and method for using microsaccade dynamics to measure attentional response to a stimulus

Inventors: Jorge Otero-Millan (Phoenix, AZ); Stephen L. Macknik (Anthem, AZ); Susana Martinez-Conde (Anthem, AZ)
Assignee: Dignity Health
A61B3/113A61B5/16A61B5/165A61B5/18A61B5/7246
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,854,966
App. No.
14/359,235
Granted
Jan 2, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for determining a subject's attentional response to a stimulus. The method includes measuring microsaccadic eye movement dynamics of the subject, detecting whether a microsaccadic signature (a suppression in microsaccadic rate) is present in the measured microsaccadic eye movement relative to a time of the stimulus, and correlating the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection. The method further includes determining that the stimulus was sensed if the microsaccadic signature is present and determining that the stimulus was not sensed if the microsaccadic signature is absent.

Claims (40)

1. A method for determining a subjects attentional response to a stimulus, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a host device comprising stimulus detection thresholds indicating a probability of the subject responding to the stimulus based upon information about the stimulus;

obtaining, by the host device, recorded data comprising recordings of eye movements of the subject acquired with an eye tracking device;

measuring, by the host device from the eye movements represented by the recorded data, microsaccadic eye movement dynamics of the subject;

calculating, from the microsaccadic eye movement dynamics, microsaccade rate over a time period including a time of the stimulus;

detecting whether a microsaccade rate suppression event is present in the measured microsaccadic eye movement dynamics relative to the time of the stimulus;

determining the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection; and

refining the stimulus detection thresholds based on the determined attentional response to the stimulus.

2. The method of claim 1 and further comprising generating a report based on the determination, the report including one of sensed, not sensed, unconscious, conscious response, and subconscious response.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection includes determining the stimulus is sensed when the microsaccade rate suppression event is present.

4. The method of claim 3 and further comprising receiving user input regarding whether the stimulus is acknowledged by the subject and correlating the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection and the user input.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection and the user input includes determining one of a conscious attentional response and a subconscious attentional response.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection includes determining the stimulus is not sensed when the microsaccade rate suppression event is absent.

7. The method of claim 1 and further comprising measuring a magnitude of the detected suppression event and correlating the magnitude of the detected suppression to a magnitude of attentional response.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measured microsaccadic eye movement dynamics include trajectories of microsaccades with respect to a field of view of the subject.

9. The method of claim 8 and further comprising determining a directional bias of microsaccades based on the trajectories and identifying a location of attentional focus of the subject with the field of view of the subject based on the directional bias.

10. A system to determine a subject's attentional response to a stimulus, the system including:

an eye tracking device capable of detecting eye movement traces; and

a host operably connected to the eye tracking device, the host device including stimulus detection thresholds indicating a probability of the subject responding to the stimulus based upon information about the stimulus, the host configured to:

receive the eye movement traces from the eye tracking device, measure microsaccadic eye movement dynamics of the subject based on the eye movement traces,

calculate, from the microsaccadic eye movement dynamics, microsaccade rate over a time period including a time of the stimulus,

detect whether a microsaccade rate suppression event is present in the measured microsaccadic eye movement relative to the time of the stimulus,

determine the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection, and

refine the stimulus detection thresholds based on the determined attentional response to the stimulus.

11. A system for determining a subject's attentional response to a stimulus, the system comprising:

a system for receiving a measure of microsaccadic eye movement dynamics of the subject from an eye tracking device capable of detecting eye movement traces and information about the stimulus;

a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon (i) stimulus detection thresholds indicating a probability of the subject responding to the stimulus based on the information about the stimulus, and (ii) instructions that, when executed by a computer processor, cause the processor to:

calculate, from the microsaccadic eye movement dynamics, microsaccade rate over a time period including a time of the stimulus,

detect, using the measure of microsaccadic eye movement dynamics of the subject, a microsaccade rate suppression event present in the measured microsaccadic eye movement relative to the time of the stimulus;

determine the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the microsaccade rate suppression event;

generate a report indicating the subject's attentional response based on the determination; and

refine the stimulus detection thresholds based on the report.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the host is further configured to generate a report based on the determination, the report including one of sensed, not sensed, unconscious, conscious response, and subconscious response.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein determining the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection includes determining the stimulus is sensed when the microsaccade rate suppression event is present.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein determining the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection includes determining the stimulus is not sensed when the microsaccade rate suppression event is absent.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the host is further configured to measure a magnitude of the detected suppression event and correlate the magnitude of the detected suppression to a magnitude of attentional response.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein determining the subject's attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection includes determining the stimulus is sensed when the microsaccade rate suppression event is present.

17. The system of claim 11 , wherein determining the subjects attentional response to the stimulus based on the detection includes determining the stimulus is not sensed when the microsaccade rate suppression event is absent.

18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions that, when executed by a computer processor, further cause the processor to measure a magnitude of the detected suppression event and correlate the magnitude of the detected suppression to a magnitude of attentional response.

19. The method of claim 1 and further comprising presenting the stimulus to the subject through a display.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2023
From: OTERO-MILLAN, JORGE; MACKNIK, STEPHEN L.; MARTINEZ-CONDE, SUSANA
To: DIGNITY HEALTH
Reel/Frame 062942/0809 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE LAST NAME OF INVENTOR OTERO-MILLAN INCORRECT. THE "I" SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM MILLIAN. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033804 FRAME 0508. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE LAST NAME SHOULD READ: OTERO-MILLAN. Recorded Sep 25, 2014
From: OTERO-MILLAN, JORGE; MACKNIK, STEPHEN L.; MARTINEZ-CONDE, SUSANA
To: DIGNITY HEALTH
Reel/Frame 033823/0835 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 24, 2014
From: OTERO-MILLIAN, JORGE; MACKNIK, STEPHEN L.; MARTINEZ-CONDE, SUSANA
To: DIGNITY HEALTH
Reel/Frame 033804/0508 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61562576 · Nov 22, 2011
Related Publication 20140336526A1 · Nov 13, 2014