IP Library Granted Patent US 9,747,924
Granted Patent B2
US 9,747,924 · App. 14/440,236 · Granted Aug 29, 2017

Sound verification

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,747,924
App. No.
14/440,236
Granted
Aug 29, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

In some examples, sound verification may include a speaker device that may be configured to transmit sound at a dynamic volume level and a listening device that may be configured to receive the sound and provide feedback to the speaker device based on the received sound. The primary transceiver device may be further configured to adjust the dynamic volume level based on the feedback provided by the secondary transceiver device.

Claims (54)

1. A sound verification system, comprising:

a speaker device configured to transmit sound at a dynamic volume level; and

a listening device configured to receive the sound and provide feedback to the speaker device based on the received sound, wherein the feedback provided is a sound-to-text conversion of the received sound, and

wherein the speaker device is further configured to control the dynamic volume level for the speaker device based on the feedback provided by the listening device.

2. The sound verification system of claim 1 ,

wherein the speaker device is further configured to:

convert the transmitted sound to a localized text version of the transmitted sound, and

adjust the dynamic volume level based on a comparison of the localized text version of the transmitted sound to a sound-to-text version of the received sound provided by the listening device.

3. A sound verification system, comprising:

a primary transceiver device configured to:

transmit sound signals; and

convert the sound signals into a primary text version of the transmitted sound signals; and

a secondary transceiver device configured to:

receive the sound signals transmitted by the primary transceiver device;

convert the received sound signals into a secondary text version of the received sound signals; and

transmit the secondary text version of the received sound signals to the primary transceiver device.

4. The sound verification system of claim 3 , wherein the primary transceiver device is further configured to:

receive the secondary text version of the received sound signals from the secondary transceiver device;

grade a level of accuracy of a comparison of the primary text version of the transmitted sound signals relative to the secondary text version of the received sound signals; and

adjust a volume level based on the grade as transmission of sound signals continues.

5. A method to verify audio transmission, comprising, by a primary device:

transmitting audio signals at an initial volume;

converting the audio signals into a source text;

receiving, respectively from one or more secondary devices, secondary text converted from the transmitted audio signals;

comparing the source text to the secondary text received from each of the one or more secondary devices; and

adjusting a volume applied to the transmission based on a result of the comparison.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the method is repeated periodically.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the method is repeated periodically by multiple primary devices.

8. The method of claim 5 ,

wherein the comparing includes assigning a score to a comparison between the source text and the secondary text received from a respective one of the one or more secondary devices, and

wherein, further, the adjusting includes increasing the volume in response to one of the scores being less than a threshold value.

9. The method of claim 5 ,

wherein the comparing includes assigning a score to a comparison between the source text and the secondary text received from a respective one of the one or more secondary devices, and

wherein, further, the adjusting includes decreasing the volume in response to one of the scores being greater than a threshold value.

10. The method of claim 5 ,

wherein the comparing includes assigning a score to a comparison between the source text and the secondary text received from a respective one of the one or more secondary devices, and

wherein, further, the adjusting includes increasing the volume in response to a majority of the scores being less than a threshold value.

11. The method of claim 5 ,

wherein the comparing includes assigning a score to a comparison between the source text and the secondary text received from a respective one of the one or more secondary devices, and

wherein, further, the adjusting includes decreasing the volume in response to a majority of the scores being greater than a threshold value.

12. A non-transitory computer-readable medium configured to store instructions that, when executed, cause one or more processors to:

transmit media signals;

store a text version of the media signals;

receive, respectively from one or more secondary devices, secondary text converted from the transmitted media signals;

compare the stored text version of the media signals to the secondary text received from each of the one or more secondary devices; and

adjust an intensity applied to a continued transmission of the media signals based on a comparison result.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 ,

wherein the media signals comprise audio signals, and

wherein the adjusting comprises adjusting a dynamic volume applied to the continued transmission of the audio signals based on the comparison result.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to periodically repeat execution of the instructions.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to periodically repeat execution of the instructions in concert with one or more processors of one or more other devices.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the adjusting is to accommodate a lowest value of the comparison result.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the adjusting is to accommodate a highest value of the comparison result.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the adjusting is to accommodate a majority of values of the comparison result, relative to a threshold value.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2020
From: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
To: CHIMETECH LICENSING LLC
Reel/Frame 053196/0392 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 2, 2020
From: CRESTLINE DIRECT FINANCE, L.P.
To: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
Reel/Frame 051404/0473 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 29, 2019
From: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
To: CRESTLINE DIRECT FINANCE, L.P.
Reel/Frame 048373/0217 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2015
From: FLIGLER, ARIEL
To: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
Reel/Frame 035708/0228 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2015
From: SHMUEL UR INNOVATION LTD,
To: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
Reel/Frame 035708/0703 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2015
From: UR, SHMUEL
To: SHMUEL UR INNOVATION LTD.
Reel/Frame 035762/0540 →