IP Library Granted Patent US 9,166,637
Granted Patent B2
US 9,166,637 · App. 14/444,489 · Granted Oct 20, 2015

Impulse noise mitigation under out-of-band interference conditions

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,166,637
App. No.
14/444,489
Granted
Oct 20, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

An impulse noise mitigation circuit (INMC) may set a cut-off frequency of each of two high pass filters to bound a frequency bandwidth of a desired signal, wherein a first of the two filters allows frequencies higher than the frequency bandwidth of the desired signal, and a second of the two filters allows frequencies lower than the frequency bandwidth of the desired signal. The INMC may compute and store a mean magnitude separately for a first signal response of the first filter and a second signal response of the second filter. The INMC may select the first filter for impulse noise mitigation when the mean magnitude of the second filter is greater than the mean magnitude of the first filter. The INMC may select the second filter for impulse noise mitigation when the mean magnitude of the first filter is greater than the second filter.

Claims (74)

1. A system comprising:

one or more filters configurable to have a first high-pass response and a second high-pass response, a signal magnitude determination circuitry, a comparator, and a filter response selection circuitry, wherein:

said signal magnitude determination circuity is operable to measure mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said first high-pass response;

said signal magnitude determination circuity is operable to measure mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said second high-pass response; and

said filter response selection circuitry is operable to select which of said first high-pass response and said second high-pass response to use for suppression of impulse noise in a received signal;

said comparator is operable to compare a first signal to an impulse noise detection threshold; and

said first signal is a result of processing of said received signal by said one or more filters configured to have the selected one of: said first high-pass response, and said second high-pass response.

2. The system of claim 1 , comprising a suppressor circuit that is operable to clip or null samples of said received signal to generate a suppressor circuit output signal.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein an output of said comparator controls said suppressor circuit.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein said signal magnitude determination circuitry comprises:

first signal magnitude determination circuitry used to control said filter response selection circuitry; and

second signal magnitude determination circuitry used for determining a magnitude of said received signal.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein a cutoff frequency of said first high-pass response is higher than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein a cutoff frequency of said second high-pass response is lower than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein said selection is based on:

said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said first high-pass response; and

said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said second high-pass response.

8. A method comprising:

in a receiver comprising one or more filters configurable to have a first high-pass response and a second high-pass response, a signal magnitude determination circuitry, a comparator, and a filter response selection circuitry:

measuring, by said signal magnitude determination circuity, mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said first high-pass response;

measuring, by said signal magnitude determination circuity, mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said second high-pass response; and

selecting, by said filter response selection circuitry, which of said first high-pass response and said second high-pass response to use for suppression of impulse noise in a received signal;

generating a first signal by processing said received signal using said one or more filters configured to have the selected one of: said first high-pass response, and said second high-pass response; and

comparing said first signal to an impulse noise detection threshold.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein said receiver comprises a suppressor circuit, and said suppressor circuit clips or nulls samples of said received signal to generate a suppressor circuit output signal.

10. The method of claim 9 , comprising controlling said clipping or nulling via an output of said comparator.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein: said signal magnitude determination circuitry comprises first signal magnitude determination circuitry and second signal magnitude determination circuitry;

said first signal magnitude determination circuitry determines a magnitude of said received signal; and

said second signal magnitude determination circuitry controls said filter response selection circuitry.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein a cutoff frequency of said first high-pass response is higher than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein a cutoff frequency of said second high-pass response is lower than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal.

14. The method of claim 8 , comprising:

performing said selecting based on:

said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said first high-pass response; and

said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said second high-pass response.

15. A system comprising:

one or more filters configurable to have a first high-pass response and a second high-pass response, a signal magnitude determination circuitry, and a filter response selection circuitry, wherein:

said signal magnitude determination circuity is operable to measure mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said first high-pass response;

said signal magnitude determination circuity is operable to measure mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said second high-pass response; and

said filter response selection circuitry is operable to select which of said first high-pass response and said second high-pass response to use for suppression of impulse noise in a received signal;

said selection is based on:

said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said first high-pass response; and

said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said second high-pass response; and

said selection is such that:

said first high-pass response is selected when said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said first high-pass response is less than said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said second high-pass response; and

said second high-pass response is selected when said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said first high-pass response is greater than said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said second high-pass response.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein:

a cutoff frequency of said first high-pass response is higher than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal; and

a cutoff frequency of said second high-pass response is lower than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal.

17. A method comprising:

in a receiver comprising one or more filters configurable to have a first high-pass response and a second high-pass response, a signal magnitude determination circuitry, a comparator, a suppressor circuit, and a filter response selection circuitry:

measuring, by said signal magnitude determination circuity, mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said first high-pass response;

measuring, by said signal magnitude determination circuity, mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said second high-pass response;

selecting, by said filter response selection circuitry, which of said first high-pass response and said second high-pass response to use for suppression of impulse noise in a received signal;

comparing, by said comparator, a first signal to an impulse noise detection threshold, said first signal is a result of processing of said received signal by said one or more filters configured to have the selected one of: said first high-pass response and said second high-pass response; and

clipping or nulling, by said suppressor circuit, samples of said received signal to generate a suppressor circuit output signal; and

controlling said clipping or nulling via an output of said comparator.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein:

a cutoff frequency of said first high-pass response is higher than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal; and

a cutoff frequency of said second high-pass response is lower than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal.

19. A method comprising:

in a receiver comprising one or more filters configurable to have a first high-pass response and a second high-pass response, a signal magnitude determination circuitry, a comparator, and a filter response selection circuitry:

measuring, by said signal magnitude determination circuity, mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said first high-pass response;

measuring, by said signal magnitude determination circuity, mean magnitude, over a determined time interval, of a signal processed using said second high-pass response; and

selecting, by said filter response selection circuitry, which of said first high-pass response and said second high-pass response to use for suppression of impulse noise in a received signal, wherein:

said selecting is based on:

said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said first high-pass response; and

said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said second high-pass response; and

said selecting is such that:

said first high-pass response is selected when said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said first high-pass response is less than said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said second high-pass response; and

said second high-pass response is selected when said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said first high-pass response is greater than said measured mean magnitude of said signal processed using said second high-pass response.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein:

a cutoff frequency of said first high-pass response is higher than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal; and

a cutoff frequency of said second high-pass response is lower than a lowest desired frequency of said received signal.

Assignments (5)
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 9, 2021
From: MAXLINEAR, INC.; MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; EXAR CORPORATION
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 056816/0089 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 23, 2021
From: MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
To: MAXLINEAR, INC.; EXAR CORPORATION; MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 056656/0204 →
SUCCESSION OF AGENCY (REEL 042453 / FRAME 0001) Recorded Jul 1, 2020
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053115/0842 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 12, 2017
From: MAXLINEAR, INC.; ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC (F/K/A ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.); EXAR CORPORATION
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 042453/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2015
From: LO, ANDY; KANG, SUGBONG
To: MAXLINEAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037003/0620 →