IP Library Granted Patent US 9,524,645
Granted Patent B2
US 9,524,645 · App. 14/477,675 · Granted Dec 20, 2016

Filtering device and environment recognition system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,524,645
App. No.
14/477,675
Granted
Dec 20, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A filtering device includes an evaluation value deriving module that derives, for a pair of images having mutual relevance, multiple evaluation values indicative of correlations between any one of blocks (reference block) that is extracted from one of the images (reference image) and multiple blocks (comparison blocks) extracted from the other image (comparison image), an evaluation range setting module that sets an evaluation range of the evaluation values, the evaluation range having one of boundaries at the evaluation value with the highest correlation among the multiple evaluation values, and a difference value determining module that determines whether the evaluation value with the highest correlation is valid as a difference value based on the multiple evaluation values and the evaluation range.

Claims (21)

1. A filtering device, comprising:

an evaluation value deriving module that derives, for a pair of comparison targets having mutual relevance, multiple evaluation values indicative of correlations with any one of extracted parts extracted from one of the comparison targets and multiple extracted parts that are extracted from the other comparison target, respectively;

an evaluation range setting module that sets an evaluation range of the evaluation values, the evaluation range having one of boundaries at the evaluation value with the highest correlation among the multiple evaluation values; and

a difference value determining module that determines whether a difference value for the evaluation value with the highest correlation is valid as the difference value based on the multiple evaluation values and the evaluation range.

2. The filtering device of claim 1 , wherein the difference value determining module determines that the evaluation value with the highest correlation is invalid as the difference value if a ratio of the evaluation values contained in the evaluation range to all the multiple evaluation values is greater than a threshold.

3. The filtering device of claim 1 , wherein the difference value determining module determines that the evaluation value with the highest correlation is invalid as the difference value if an area of a polygon formed with the evaluation values contained in the evaluation range is greater than a threshold, the polygon being formed so as to have the other boundary of the evaluation range as one side of the polygon.

4. The filtering device of claim 1 , wherein the evaluation range setting module changes the evaluation range, according to the evaluation value with the highest correlation.

5. The filtering device of claim 2 , wherein the evaluation range setting module changes the evaluation range according to the evaluation value with the highest correlation.

6. The filtering device of claim 3 , wherein the evaluation range setting module changes the evaluation range according to the evaluation value with the highest correlation.

7. The filtering device of claim 1 , wherein the comparison target is an image and the extracted part is a block consisting of one or more pixels in the image.

8. The filtering device of claim 2 , wherein the comparison target is an image and the extracted part is a block consisting of one or more pixels in the image.

9. The filtering device of claim 3 , wherein the comparison target is an image and the extracted part is a block consisting of one or more pixels in the image.

10. The filtering device of claim 7 , wherein the evaluation range setting module changes the evaluation range according to an average value of luminance of the pixels in a predetermined area of the image.

11. The filtering device of claim 8 , wherein the evaluation range setting module changes the evaluation range according to an average value of luminance of the pixels in a predetermined area of the image.

12. The filtering device of claim 9 , wherein the evaluation range setting module changes the evaluation range according to an average value of luminance of the pixels in a predetermined area of the image.

13. An environment recognition system, comprising:

one or more imaging devices configured to generate a pair of images having mutual relevance;

one or more processors, configured to:

derive, for the pair of generated images, multiple evaluation values indicative of correlations between any one of blocks that is extracted from one of the images and multiple blocks extracted from the other image;

set an evaluation range of the evaluation values, the evaluation range having one of boundaries at the evaluation value with the highest correlation among the multiple evaluation values; and

determine whether a parallax for the evaluation value with the highest correlation is valid as the parallax based on the multiple evaluation values and the evaluation range.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 12, 2017
From: FUJI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
To: SUBARU CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 042624/0886 →
CHANGE OF ADDRESS Recorded Oct 31, 2014
From: FUJI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
To: FUJI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 034114/0841 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 4, 2014
From: ONO, HIROYUKI
To: FUJI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 033672/0479 →