IP Library Granted Patent US 9,916,551
Granted Patent B1
US 9,916,551 · App. 14/530,286 · Granted Mar 13, 2018

Business continuity optimization

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,916,551
App. No.
14/530,286
Granted
Mar 13, 2018
Kind
B1
Abstract

Disclosed are methods and systems for optimizing business continuity in IT environments. One such method involves comparing a representation and a template. The representation represents units of computing entities, and relationships between the units of computing entities. The method determines whether a system represented by the representation meets a threshold represented by the template based on a result of the comparing, and provides a result of the determining. The threshold can established by a disaster recovery site, a service level agreement, or a configuration drift, and the result of the determining can be used to evaluate the disaster recovery site, the service level agreement, or the configuration drift.

Claims (111)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

retrieving a minimum functional template and a minimum acceptable template;

comparing a first representation of a primary site and the minimum functional template, wherein

the first representation represents a plurality of units of computing entities and a plurality of relationships between the plurality of units of computing entities;

comparing a second representation of a secondary site and the minimum acceptable template;

determining that the primary site represented by the first representation meets a minimum functional operating state represented by the minimum functional template; and

based on the determining, migrating one or more units of computing entities of the plurality of units of computing entities from the primary site to the secondary site, wherein

the one or more units of computing entities do not have a co-location relationship with one or more remaining computing entities of the plurality of computing entities,

as a result of the migration, the second representation matches a minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site represented by the minimum acceptable template, and

the one or more units of computing entities are not necessary to maintain the minimum functional operating state of the primary site.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a user input from a user, wherein

the user input comprises the representation; and

clustering the representation into one or more groups, wherein

the one or more groups represent a minimum functional operating state of a primary site, and

the minimum functional operating state is represented by the minimum functional template.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein

the clustering is based on one or more similar characteristics shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities,

the minimum functional template is stored on a computing device, and

the result of the determining is provided to the user.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

notifying the user of the minimum functional operating state of the primary site as represented by the minimum functional template;

receiving an another user input from the user indicating a minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site;

creating a minimum acceptable template based on the minimum acceptable operating state, wherein

the minimum acceptable template is a representation of the minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site; and

storing the minimum acceptable template on the computing device.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein

the one or more similar characteristics shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities comprise:

one or more similar hardware attributes shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities; or

a range of one or more similar hardware attributes shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities.

6. The method of claim 2 , wherein

the representation of the minimum functional operating state of the primary site created by the clustering comprises representing the plurality of units of computing entities using one or more vertices.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein

the clustering is performed using a clustering algorithm which implements hierarchical clustering.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein

the threshold is established by a configuration of a disaster recovery site, a service level agreement, or a configuration drift level.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating the minimum functional template, wherein

the minimum functional template represents the minimum functional operating state of a primary site;

generating the minimum acceptable template, wherein

the minimum acceptable template represents the minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site; and

storing the minimum functional template and the minimum acceptable template on a computing device.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing the second representation of the minimum acceptable operating state using vertices; and

determining whether the second representation and the minimum acceptable template are isomorphic.

11. A computer readable storage medium comprising program instructions executable to:

retrieve a minimum functional template and a minimum acceptable template;

compare a first representation of a primary site and the minimum functional template, wherein

the first representation represents a plurality of units of computing entities and a plurality of relationships between the plurality of units of computing entities;

compare a second representation of a secondary site and the minimum acceptable template;

determine that the primary site represented by the first representation meets a minimum functional operating state represented by the minimum functional template; and

based on the determining, migrate one or more units of computing entities of the plurality of units of computing entities from the primary site to the secondary site, wherein

the one or more units of computing entities do not have a co-location relationship with one or more remaining computing entities of the plurality of computing entities,

as a result of the migration, the second representation matches a minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site represented by the minimum acceptable template, and

the one or more units of computing entities are not necessary to maintain the minimum functional operating state of the primary site.

12. The computer readable storage medium of claim 11 , further comprising:

receiving a user input from a user, wherein

the user input comprises the representation; and

clustering the representation into one or more groups, wherein

the one or more groups represent a minimum functional operating state of the primary site, and

the minimum functional operating state is represented by the minimum functional template.

13. The computer readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein

the clustering is based on one or more similar characteristics shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities,

the minimum functional template is stored on a computing device, and

the result of the determining is provided to the user.

14. The computer readable storage medium of claim 13 , further comprising:

notifying the user of the minimum functional operating state of the primary site as represented by the minimum functional template;

receiving an another user input from the user indicating a minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site;

creating a minimum acceptable template based on the minimum acceptable operating state, wherein

the minimum acceptable template is a representation of the minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site; and

storing the minimum acceptable template on the computing device.

15. The computer readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein

the one or more similar characteristics shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities comprise:

one or more similar hardware attributes shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities; or

a range of one or more similar hardware attributes shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities.

16. The computer readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein

the representation of the minimum functional operating state of the primary site created by the clustering comprises representing the plurality of units of computing entities using one or more vertices.

17. The computer readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein

the clustering is performed using a clustering algorithm which implements hierarchical clustering, and

the threshold is established by a configuration of a disaster recovery site, a service level agreement, or a configuration drift level.

18. A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

a memory coupled to the one or more processors, wherein the memory stores program instructions executable by the one or more processors to:

retrieve a minimum functional template and a minimum acceptable template;

compare a first representation of a primary site and the minimum functional template, wherein

the first representation represents a plurality of units of computing entities and a plurality of relationships between the plurality of units of computing entities;

compare a second representation of a secondary site and the minimum acceptable template;

determine that the primary site represented by the first representation meets a minimum functional operating state represented by the minimum functional template; and

based on the determining, migrate one or more units of computing entities of the plurality of units of computing entities from the primary site to the secondary site, wherein

the one or more units of computing entities do not have a co-location relationship with one or more remaining computing entities of the plurality of computing entities,

as a result of the migration, the second representation matches a minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site represented by the minimum acceptable template, and

the one or more units of computing entities are not necessary to maintain the minimum functional operating state of the primary site.

19. The system of claim 18 , further comprising:

receiving a user input from a user, wherein

the user input comprises the representation; and

clustering the representation into one or more groups, wherein

the one or more groups represent a minimum functional operating state of the primary site, and

the minimum functional operating state is represented by the minimum functional template.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein

the clustering is based on one or more similar characteristics shared between two or more of each of the plurality of units of computing entities,

the minimum functional template is stored on a computing device, and

the result of the determining is provided to the user.

21. The system of claim 20 , further comprising:

notifying the user of the minimum functional operating state of the primary site as represented by the minimum functional template;

receiving an another user input from the user indicating a minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site;

creating a minimum acceptable template based on the minimum acceptable operating state, wherein

the minimum acceptable template is a representation of the minimum acceptable operating state of the primary site; and

storing the minimum acceptable template on the computing device.

22. The system of claim 18 , wherein

the clustering is performed using a clustering algorithm which implements hierarchical clustering, and

the threshold is established by a configuration of a disaster recovery site, a service level agreement, or a configuration drift level.

Assignments (13)
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 8, 2025
From: VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COHESITY, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 070779/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 26, 2025
From: VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: COHESITY, INC.
Reel/Frame 070335/0013 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2024
From: ACQUIOM AGENCY SERVICES LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC (F/K/A VERITAS US IP HOLDINGS LLC)
Reel/Frame 069712/0090 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2024
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 069634/0584 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2024
From: VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COHESITY, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK. N.A.
Reel/Frame 069890/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL Recorded Nov 25, 2024
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ASSIGNOR
To: ACQUIOM AGENCY SERVICES LLC, AS ASSIGNEE
Reel/Frame 069440/0084 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY IN PATENTS AT R/F 037891/0726 Recorded Nov 30, 2020
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: VERITAS US IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 054535/0814 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2020
From: VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054370/0134 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 18, 2016
From: VERITAS US IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 038483/0203 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2016
From: VERITAS US IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037891/0726 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2016
From: VERITAS US IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037891/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 4, 2016
From: SYMANTEC CORPORATION
To: VERITAS US IP HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 037693/0158 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 3, 2014
From: BANDOPADHYAY, TUSHAR
To: SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 034088/0155 →