Method for prioritizing throughput for network shares
View Patent ↗Some embodiments are directed to a method, corresponding system, and corresponding apparatus for handling Quality of Service (QoS) for one or more network file shares associated with one or more Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers. Some embodiments may determine an actual value for a QoS parameter for network file shares, through a benchmark test procedure. Some embodiments may assign a QoS policy to the network file shares. Some embodiments may associate the QoS policy with the QoS parameter. Some embodiments may control the QoS policy at the NAS servers. Some embodiments may determine a current speed capability of one or more network interface controllers (NICs) associated with the NAS servers. Some embodiments may also compare the current speed capability of the NICs to the given actual value for the given QoS parameter resulting from the benchmark test procedure.
1. A computer-implemented method for handling Quality of Service (QoS) for one or more network file shares associated with one or more Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers, the method comprising:
determining a given actual value for a given QoS parameter for at least one of the one or more network file shares, through a benchmark test procedure;
assigning a given QoS policy to the at least one of the one or more network file shares;
associating the given QoS policy with the given QoS parameter; and
controlling, at the one or more NAS servers, the given QoS policy,
wherein the given QoS policy assigned to the at least one of the one or more network file shares has a different priority compared with a given QoS policy assigned to at least one other of the one or more network file shares.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining a number of the one or more NAS servers, and determining a current speed capability of one or more network interface controllers (NICs) associated with the at least one of the one or more NAS servers;
performing a comparison between the current speed capability of the NICs and the given actual value for the given QoS parameter resulting from the benchmark test procedure; and
presenting results of the comparison to a user.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more network file shares comprise a plurality of network file shares.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
assigning the given QoS policy to the at least one of the one or more network file shares, the assignment based upon a domain name system (DNS) associated with the at least one of the one or more network file shares.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
assigning the given QoS policy to the at least one of the one or more network file shares, the assignment based upon a given Internet Protocol (IP) address associated with the at least one of the one or more network file shares.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the given IP address associated with the at least one of the one or more network file shares is different from at least one other given IP address associated with at least one other of the one or more network file shares.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more network file shares communicate with the one or more Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers through one or more Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) interfaces.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more network file shares communicate with the one or more Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers through one or more Direct-Attached Storage (DAS) interfaces.
9. An information handling system (IHS) comprising:
a computing module configured to associate one or more network file shares with one or more Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers;
a data module configured to determine a given actual value for a given Quality of Service (QoS) parameter for at least one of the one or more network file shares, through a benchmark test procedure;
the computing module further configured to assign a given QoS policy to the at least one of the one or more network file shares;
the computing module further configured to associate the given QoS policy with the given QoS parameter; and
the computing module further configured to control, at the one or more NAS servers, the given QoS policy,
wherein the given QoS policy assigned to the at least one of the one or more network file shares has a different priority compared with a given QoS policy assigned to at least one other of the one or more network file shares.
10. The IHS of claim 9 , further comprising:
the computing module further configured to determine a number of the one or more NAS servers, the computing module further configured to determine a current speed capability of one or more network interface controllers (NICs) associated with the at least one of the one or more NAS servers;
the computing module further configured to perform a comparison between the current speed capability of the NICs and the given actual value for the given QoS parameter resulting from the benchmark test procedure; and
a reporting module configured to present results of the comparison to a user.
11. The IHS of claim 9 , wherein the one or more network file shares comprise a plurality of network file shares.
12. The IHS of claim 9 , further comprising:
the computing module further configured to assign the given QoS policy to the at least one of the one or more network file shares, the assignment based upon a domain name system (DNS) associated with the at least one of the one or more network file shares.
13. The IHS of claim 9 , further comprising:
the computing module further configured to assign the given QoS policy to the at least one of the one or more network file shares, the assignment based upon a given Internet Protocol (IP) address associated with the at least one of the one or more network file shares.
14. The IHS of claim 13 , wherein the given IP address associated with the at least one of the one or more network file shares is different from at least one other given IP address associated with at least one other of the one or more network file shares.
15. The IHS of claim 9 , wherein the one or more network file shares communicate with the one or more Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers through one or more Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) interfaces.
16. The IHS of claim 9 , wherein the one or more network file shares communicate with the one or more Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers through one or more Direct-Attached Storage (DAS) interfaces.
17. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a sequence of instructions which, when loaded and executed by a processor coupled to an apparatus, causes the apparatus to:
associate one or more network file shares with one or more Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers;
determine a given actual value for a given Quality of Service (QoS) parameter for at least one of the one or more network file shares, through a benchmark test procedure;
assign a given QoS policy to the at least one of the one or more network file shares;
associate the given QoS policy with the given QoS parameter; and
control, at the one or more NAS servers, the given QoS policy,
wherein the given QoS policy assigned to the at least one of the one or more network file shares has a different priority compared with a given QoS policy assigned to at least one other of the one or more network file shares.