IP Library Granted Patent US 9,535,619
Granted Patent B2
US 9,535,619 · App. 14/537,039 · Granted Jan 3, 2017

Enhanced reconstruction in an array of information storage devices by physical disk reduction without losing data

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,535,619
App. No.
14/537,039
Granted
Jan 3, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

An information handling system and method provide for receiving a request to remove a selected physical disk from a disk group realizing a virtual disk in a redundant array data storage subsystem, determining whether removal of the selected physical disk is feasible, and, when feasible, removing the selected physical disk from the disk group without deleting the virtual disk realized by the disk group and reconstructing the virtual disk to be realized by the disk group using only the proposed number of physical disks, wherein the proposed number of physical disks is less than an initial number of physical disks of the disk group.

Claims (33)

1. A method comprising:

receiving a request to remove a selected physical disk from a disk group, wherein the disk group realizes a virtual disk in a redundant array data storage subsystem;

determining whether an amount of existing virtual disk usage is less than or equal to an amount of storage capacity of a lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by a difference of a proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and a maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated; and

when the amount of existing virtual disk usage is less than or equal to the amount of lowest storage capacity of the lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by the difference of the proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and the maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated, removing the selected physical disk from the disk group without deleting the virtual disk realized by the disk group and reconstructing the virtual disk to be realized by the disk group using only the proposed number of physical disks, wherein the proposed number of physical disks is less than an initial number of physical disks of the disk group.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the receiving the request further comprises:

detecting a predictive failure indication indicating the selected physical disk for removal.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

when the amount of existing virtual disk usage is greater than the amount of storage capacity of the lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by the difference of the proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and the maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated, providing an error message without removing the selected physical disk from the disk group.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

comparing a replacement physical disk storage capacity of a replacement physical disk to the lowest storage capacity; and

when the replacement physical disk capacity is greater than or equal to the lowest storage capacity, adding the replacement physical disk to the disk group without deleting the virtual disk realized by the disk group and reconstructing the virtual disk to be realized by the disk group including the replacement physical disk.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

reconfiguring the selected physical disk to serve as a hot spare for the disk group.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proposed number of physical disks is one less than the initial number of physical disks.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the receiving the request to remove the selected physical disk from the disk group is performed in absence of a fault indication for the selected physical disk.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the request is a user request received in response to user input.

9. An information handling system comprising:

a disk group comprising an array of physical disks, the physical disks comprising a selected physical disk and a lowest capacity physical disk; and

a disk controller coupled to the disk group, the disk controller configured to receive a request to remove a selected physical disk from a disk group, to determine whether an amount of existing virtual disk usage is less than or equal to an amount of storage capacity of a lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by a difference of a proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and a maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated, and, when the amount of existing virtual disk usage is less than or equal to the amount of lowest storage capacity of the lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by the difference of the proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and the maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated, to remove the selected physical disk from the disk group without deleting the virtual disk realized by the disk group and to reconstruct the virtual disk to be realized by the disk group using only the proposed number of physical disks, wherein the proposed number of physical disks is less than an initial number of physical disks of the disk group.

10. The information handling system of claim 9 , wherein the disk controller is further configured to detect a predictive failure indication indicating the selected physical disk for removal.

11. The information handling system of claim 9 , wherein the disk controller is further configured, when the amount of existing virtual disk usage is greater than the amount of storage capacity of the lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by the difference of the proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and the maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated, to provide an error message without removing the selected physical disk from the disk group.

12. The information handling system of claim 9 , wherein the disk controller is further configured to compare a replacement physical disk storage capacity of a replacement physical disk to the lowest storage capacity, and, when the replacement physical disk capacity is greater than or equal to the lowest storage capacity, to add the replacement physical disk to the disk group without deleting the virtual disk realized by the disk group and reconstructing the virtual disk to be realized by the disk group including the replacement physical disk.

13. The information handling system of claim 9 , wherein the disk controller is further configured to reconfigure the selected physical disk to serve as a hot spare in the information handling system.

14. The information handling system of claim 9 , wherein the proposed number of physical disks is one less than the initial number of physical disks.

15. The information handling system of claim 9 , wherein the disk controller is configured to receive the request to remove the selected physical disk from the disk group in absence of a fault indication for the selected physical disk.

16. A nontransitory computer readable medium comprising instruction code executable by a processor to cause the processor to:

receive a request to remove a selected physical disk from a disk group, wherein the disk group realizes a virtual disk in a redundant array data storage subsystem;

determine whether an amount of existing virtual disk usage is less than or equal to an amount of storage capacity of a lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by a difference of a proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and a maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated; and

when the amount of existing virtual disk usage is less than or equal to the amount of lowest storage capacity of the lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by the difference of the proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and the maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated, remove the selected physical disk from the disk group without deleting the virtual disk realized by the disk group and reconstruct the virtual disk to be realized by the disk group using only the proposed number of physical disks, wherein the proposed number of physical disks is less than an initial number of physical disks of the disk group.

17. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , further comprising instruction code executable by the processor to cause the processor, when the amount of existing virtual disk usage is greater than the amount of storage capacity of the lowest capacity physical disk of the disk group multiplied by the difference of the proposed number of physical disks to be included in the disk group and the maximum number of failed physical disks that can be tolerated, to provide an error message without removing the selected physical disk from the disk group.

18. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , further comprising instruction code executable by the processor to compare a replacement physical disk storage capacity of a replacement physical disk to the lowest storage capacity, and, when the replacement physical disk capacity is greater than or equal to the lowest storage capacity, to add the replacement physical disk to the disk group without deleting the virtual disk realized by the disk group and reconstructing the virtual disk to be realized by the disk group including the replacement physical disk.

19. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , further comprising instruction code executable by the processor to cause the processor to reconfigure the selected physical disk to serve as a hot spare for the disk group.

20. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the proposed number of physical disks is one less than the initial number of physical disks.

Assignments (15)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053546/0001) Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL MARKETING L.P. (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC. AND WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.); EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 071642/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (045455/0001) Recorded May 20, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.); DELL MARKETING L.P. (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); DELL USA L.P.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC. AND WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.); EMC CORPORATION (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO MAGINATICS LLC); EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO MOZY, INC.); SCALEIO LLC
Reel/Frame 061753/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (040136/0001) Recorded Apr 26, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.); DELL MARKETING L.P. (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); DELL USA L.P.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC. AND WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.); EMC CORPORATION (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO MAGINATICS LLC); EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO MOZY, INC.); SCALEIO LLC
Reel/Frame 061324/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 3, 2021
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.; AVENTAIL LLC; CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL USA L.P.; DELL INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL SOFTWARE INC.; DELL SYSTEMS CORPORATION; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; MAGINATICS LLC; MOZY, INC.; SCALEIO LLC; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
Reel/Frame 058216/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2020
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053546/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 21, 2019
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049452/0223 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.; AVENTAIL LLC; CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL USA L.P.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL SOFTWARE INC.; DELL SYSTEMS CORPORATION; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; MAGINATICS LLC; MOZY, INC.; SCALEIO LLC; SPANNING CLOUD APPS LLC; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040136/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.; AVENTAIL LLC; CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL USA L.P.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL SOFTWARE INC.; DELL SYSTEMS CORPORATION; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; MAGINATICS LLC; MOZY, INC.; SCALEIO LLC; SPANNING CLOUD APPS LLC; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040134/0001 →
RELEASE OF REEL 035104 FRAME 0043 (NOTE) Recorded Sep 14, 2016
From: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL SOFTWARE INC.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 040027/0123 →
RELEASE OF REEL 035103 FRAME 0809 (TL) Recorded Sep 14, 2016
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL SOFTWARE INC.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 040027/0934 →
RELEASE OF REEL 035103 FRAME 0536 (ABL) Recorded Sep 13, 2016
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: DELL SOFTWARE INC.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 040016/0864 →
SUPPLEMENT TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES) Recorded Feb 26, 2015
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL SOFTWARE INC.; COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 035104/0043 →
SUPPLEMENT TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (ABL) Recorded Feb 26, 2015
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL SOFTWARE INC.; COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 035103/0536 →
SUPPLEMENT TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (TERM LOAN) Recorded Feb 26, 2015
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL SOFTWARE INC.; COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 035103/0809 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2014
From: JOSHI, NEERAJ; AGARWAL, SANDEEP; SREEDHAR M, DEEPU S.
To: DELL PRODUCTS, LP
Reel/Frame 034138/0128 →