IP Library Granted Patent US 9,452,050
Granted Patent B2
US 9,452,050 · App. 14/602,143 · Granted Sep 27, 2016

Method incorporating computer-implemented steps, a computing device and a computer readable storage medium for developing manufacturing parameters for manufacturing an orthopaedic implant

Inventors: Brad Peter Miles (Walsh Bay, AU); Peter Bede O'Connor (Walsh Bay, AU); Justin Roe (Walsh Bay, AU); Brett Fritsch (Walsh Bay, AU); Len Walter (Walsh Bay, AU); Ed Marel (Walsh Bay, AU); Michael Solomon (Walsh Bay, AU); Brian Cheung (Mission Viejo, CA); Milton Scott Bergeon (Mission Viejo, CA); James William Pierrepont (Cremorne, AU)
Assignee: CORIN LIMITED
A61F2/30942A61B34/10A61B90/06G06F19/3437A61B34/30A61B2034/102A61B2034/105A61B2090/3945A61F2002/30952F04C2270/041G06F17/5009
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,452,050
App. No.
14/602,143
Granted
Sep 27, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a method incorporating computer-implemented steps, a computing device, and a computer readable storage medium, for developing manufacturing parameters for manufacturing an orthopaedic implant. The method comprises the computer-implemented steps of being responsive to patient specific information data for deriving patient data, where the patient specific information data is indicative of one or more dynamic characteristics, being responsive to the patient data for calculating design data for the orthopaedic implant, and developing the manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant according to the design data.

Claims (49)

1. A method for developing manufacturing parameters for manufacturing an orthopaedic implant for a joint of a patient having an orthopaedic implant articulation surface, the method comprising the computer-implemented steps of:

being responsive to patient specific information data for deriving patient data, the patient specific information data being indicative of one or more dynamic characteristics;

being responsive to the patient data for calculating design data for the orthopaedic implant; and

developing the manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant according to the design data.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the patient specific information data comprises patient acquired data indicative of one or more desired post-implant activities.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamic characteristics comprises a virtual prediction based on one or more of: joint kinematics data; joint loading data; and joint articulation behaviour data during desired post-implant activities.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 , the method further comprising the computer-implemented steps of:

receiving patient acquired data, the patient acquired data being indicative of one or more desired post-implant activities, the patient acquired data comprising post-implant activities preference data;

being responsive to the post-implant activities preference data for calculating post-implant design data for the orthopaedic implant; and

developing the manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant further according to the post-implant design data.

5. A method as claimed in claim 4 , the method further comprising the computer-implemented step of:

accessing a database of library design data, wherein the manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant are further developed according to the library design data.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the library design data comprises data relating to a group of available orthopaedic implants for performing at least one of the one or more desired post-implant activities.

7. A method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the library design data comprises data relating to a group of patients fitted with an orthopaedic implant for performing at least one of the one or more desired post-implant activities.

8. A method for manufacturing an orthopaedic implant for a joint of a patient having an orthopaedic implant articulation surface, the method comprising the steps of:

developing manufacturing parameters using the method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 ; and

manufacturing the orthopaedic implant according to the manufacturing parameters.

9. A method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the orthopaedic implant is manufactured using a manufacturing process, comprising one or both of: an additive manufacturing process, and a subtractive manufacturing process.

10. A computing device for developing manufacturing parameters for manufacturing an orthopaedic implant for a joint of a patient having an orthopaedic implant articulation surface, the computing device comprising:

a processor for processing digital data;

a memory device for storing digital data including computer program code and being coupled to the processor via a bus; and

a data interface for sending and receiving digital data and being coupled to the processor via the bus, wherein the processor is controlled by the computer program code to:

receive, via the data interface, patient specific information data for deriving patient data, the patient specific information being indicative of one or more dynamic characteristics;

calculate patient data according to the patient specific information data;

calculate design data for the orthopaedic implant according to the patient data; and

calculate the manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant according to the design data.

11. A computing device as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the one or more dynamic characteristics comprises a virtual prediction based on one or more of: joint kinematics data; joint loading data; and joint articulation behaviour data during desired post-implant activities.

12. A computing device as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the patient specific information data comprises data indicative of one or more physical characteristics of the patient.

13. A computing device as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the one or more physical characteristics comprises one or more of: age data, gender data, height data, weight data, activity level data, BMI data, body condition data, and body shape data.

14. A computing device as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the processor is further controlled by the computer program code to:

receive, via the data interface, patient acquired data being indicative of one or more desired post-implant activities, the patient acquired data comprising post-implant activities preference data;

calculate post-implant design data for the orthopaedic implant according to the post-implant activities preference data; and

calculate the manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant according to the post-implant design data.

15. A computing device as claimed in claim 14 , wherein the post-implant activities preference data is a preference ratio being indicative of comparative patient preference for the one or more desired post-implant activities.

16. A computing device as claimed in claim 14 , further comprising a database for storing digital data including library design data, the database being coupled to the processor, wherein the processor is further controlled by the computer program code to:

load from the database, the library design data, wherein the manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant are further calculated according to the library design data.

17. A computing device as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the library design data comprises data relating to a group of available orthopaedic implants for performing at least one of the one or more desired post-implant activities.

18. A computer readable storage medium comprising computer program code instructions, being executable by a computer, for:

receiving, via a data interface, patient specific information data for deriving patient data, the patient specific information being indicative of one or more dynamic characteristics;

calculating patient data according to the patient specific information data;

calculating design data for an orthopaedic implant according to the patient data; and

calculating manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant according to the design data.

19. A computer readable storage medium as claimed in claim 18 , further comprising instructions for:

receiving, via the data interface, patient acquired data being indicative of one or more desired post-implant activities, the patient acquired data comprising post-implant activities preference data;

calculating post-implant design data according to the post-implant activities preference data; and

calculating manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant according to the post-implant design data.

20. A computer readable storage medium as claimed in claim 19 , wherein the post-implant activities preference data is a preference ratio being indicative of comparative patient preference for the one or more desired post-implant activities.

21. A computer readable storage medium as claimed in claim 19 , further comprising instruction for:

loading from a database, library design data, wherein the manufacturing parameters for manufacturing the orthopaedic implant are further calculated according to the library design data.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 13, 2016
From: OPTIMIZED ORTHO PTY LTD
To: CORIN LIMITED
Reel/Frame 038895/0161 →
ASSIGNEE ADDRESS CHANGE Recorded Apr 29, 2015
From: OPTIMIZED ORTHO PTY LTD
To: OPTIMIZED ORTHO PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 035534/0683 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 22, 2015
From: MILES, BRAD PETER; O'CONNOR, PETER BEDE; ROE, JUSTIN; FRITSCH, BRETT; WALTER, LEN; MAREL, ED; SOLOMON, MICHAEL; CHEUNG, BRIAN; BERGEON, MILTON SCOTT; PIERREPONT, JAMES WILLIAM
To: OPTIMIZED ORTHO PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 034790/0866 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2011900673 · Feb 25, 2011 · national
Continuity (2)
Division 14000858
Related Publication 20150223939A1 · Aug 13, 2015