IP Library Granted Patent US 9,600,320
Granted Patent B2
US 9,600,320 · App. 14/619,140 · Granted Mar 21, 2017

Mitigation of virtual machine security breaches

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,600,320
App. No.
14/619,140
Granted
Mar 21, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

An approach provides solutions for responding to threats to virtual machines (VMs) and mitigating the risks of potential breaches to VMs that reside in the same neighborhood as VMs that are affected by threats. The approach can provide proactive responsive actions for one or more VMs in a determined neighborhood that help protect those VMs in a selective and prioritized manner.

Claims (55)

1. A method for responding to a threat affecting a virtual machine, comprising:

detecting, by one or more computer processors, a threat affecting a first virtual machine;

responsive to detecting the threat affecting the first virtual machine, determining, by one or more computer processors, a neighborhood of the first virtual machine comprising one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat;

calculating, by one or more computer processors, a response factor for each virtual machine in the determined neighborhood;

determining, by one or more computer processors, a first responsive action to perform to protect a second virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on the calculated response factor for the second virtual machine;

determining, by one or more computer processors, a second responsive action to perform to protect a third virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on the calculated response factor for the third virtual machine;

determining, by one or more computer processors, an order in which to perform the first responsive action and second responsive action based upon at least the calculated response factors for the second virtual machine and the third virtual machine; and

performing, by one or more computer processors, the first responsive action and the second responsive action in the determined order.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neighborhood is determined based upon at least logical distances between the first virtual machine and the one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein a logical distance between the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least an extent to which the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine share resources, users, domains, networks, storage, applications, hypervisors, and virtual adapters.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first responsive action comprises migrating the second virtual machine to another host computer system, and the second responsive action comprises migrating a workload of the third virtual machine to another virtual machine on a same host computer system as the third virtual machine.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the first responsive action is determined based on the calculated response factor for the second virtual machine satisfying a specified threshold that is not satisfied by the calculated response factor for the third virtual machine.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculated response factor for each particular virtual machine reflects an urgency with which action should be taken to protect that particular virtual machine from the detected threat.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the response factor for each particular virtual machine is calculated based upon at least a logical distance between that particular virtual machine and the first virtual machine, and one or more numerical values that reflect a degree of risk of the detected threat spreading from the first virtual machine to that particular virtual machine.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating, by one or more computer processors, a response factor for each virtual machine in the determined neighborhood comprises:

calculating, by one or more computer processors, an urgency factor for the first virtual machine based upon at least a value reflecting a level of confidence in one or more security alerts associated with the detected threat, a value reflecting strength of the first virtual machine, a value reflecting an ability of security controls to protect the first virtual machine, a value reflecting risk that multi-tenant security controls cannot isolate the first virtual machine, and a value reflecting elapsed time since the detected threat was detected or since the detected threat occurred; and

calculating, by one or more computer processors, for each particular virtual machine in the determined neighborhood, the response factor for that particular virtual machine based upon at least a logical distance between that particular virtual machine and the first virtual machine and the urgency factor for the first virtual machine.

9. A computer program product for responding to a threat affecting a virtual machine, comprising:

one or more computer readable storage media and program instructions stored on the one or more computer readable storage media, the program instructions comprising:

program instructions to detect a threat affecting a first virtual machine;

program instructions to, responsive to detecting the threat affecting the first virtual machine, determine a neighborhood of the first virtual machine comprising one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat;

program instructions to calculate a response factor for each virtual machine in the determined neighborhood;

program instructions to determine a first responsive action to perform to protect a second virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on the calculated response factor for the second virtual machine;

program instructions to determine a second responsive action to perform to protect a third virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on the calculated response factor for the third virtual machine;

program instructions to determine an order in which to perform the first responsive action and second responsive action based upon at least the calculated response factors for the second virtual machine and the third virtual machine; and

program instructions to perform the first responsive action and the second responsive action in the determined order.

10. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the neighborhood is determined based upon at least logical distances between the first virtual machine and the one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat.

11. The computer program product of claim 10 , wherein a logical distance between the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least an extent to which the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine share resources, users, domains, networks, storage, applications, hypervisors, and virtual adapters.

12. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the first responsive action comprises migrating the second virtual machine to another host computer system, and the second responsive action comprises migrating a workload of the third virtual machine to another virtual machine on a same host computer system as the third virtual machine.

13. The computer program product of claim 12 , wherein the first responsive action is determined based on the calculated response factor for the second virtual machine satisfying a specified threshold that is not satisfied by the calculated response factor for the third virtual machine.

14. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the calculated response factor for each particular virtual machine reflects an urgency with which action should be taken to protect that particular virtual machine from the detected threat.

15. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the response factor for each particular virtual machine is calculated based upon at least a logical distance between that particular virtual machine and the first virtual machine, and one or more numerical values that reflect a degree of risk of the detected threat spreading from the first virtual machine to that particular virtual machine.

16. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the program instructions to calculate a response factor for each virtual machine in the determined neighborhood comprises:

program instructions to calculate an urgency factor for the first virtual machine based upon at least a value reflecting a level of confidence in one or more security alerts associated with the detected threat, a value reflecting strength of the first virtual machine, a value reflecting an ability of security controls to protect the first virtual machine, a value reflecting risk that multi-tenant security controls cannot isolate the first virtual machine, and a value reflecting elapsed time since the detected threat was detected or since the detected threat occurred; and

program instructions to calculate, for each particular virtual machine in the determined neighborhood, the response factor for that particular virtual machine based upon at least a logical distance between that particular virtual machine and the first virtual machine and the urgency factor for the first virtual machine.

17. A computer system for responding to a threat affecting a virtual machine, comprising:

one or more hardware computer processors;

one or more computer readable storage media; and

program instructions stored on the one or more computer readable storage media for execution by at least one of the one or more processors, the program instructions comprising:

program instructions to detect a threat affecting a first virtual machine;

program instructions to, responsive to detecting the threat affecting the first virtual machine, determine a neighborhood of the first virtual machine comprising one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat;

program instructions to calculate a response factor for each virtual machine in the determined neighborhood;

program instructions to determine a first responsive action to perform to protect a second virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on the calculated response factor for the second virtual machine;

program instructions to determine a second responsive action to perform to protect a third virtual machine in the determined neighborhood from the detected threat based at least on the calculated response factor for the third virtual machine;

program instructions to determine an order in which to perform the first responsive action and second responsive action based upon at least the calculated response factors for the second virtual machine and the third virtual machine; and

program instructions to perform the first responsive action and the second responsive action in the determined order.

18. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein the neighborhood is determined based upon at least logical distances between the first virtual machine and the one or more virtual machines that might be affected by the detected threat.

19. The computer system of claim 18 , wherein a logical distance between the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine is calculated based upon at least an extent to which the first virtual machine and the second virtual machine share resources, users, domains, networks, storage, applications, hypervisors, and virtual adapters.

20. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein the first responsive action comprises migrating the second virtual machine to another host computer system, and the second responsive action comprises migrating a workload of the third virtual machine to another virtual machine on a same host computer system as the third virtual machine.

21. The computer system of claim 20 , wherein the first responsive action is determined based on the calculated response factor for the second virtual machine satisfying a specified threshold that is not satisfied by the calculated response factor for the third virtual machine.

22. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein the calculated response factor for each particular virtual machine reflects an urgency with which action should be taken to protect that particular virtual machine from the detected threat.

23. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein the response factor for each particular virtual machine is calculated based upon at least a logical distance between that particular virtual machine and the first virtual machine, and one or more numerical values that reflect a degree of risk of the detected threat spreading from the first virtual machine to that particular virtual machine.

24. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein the program instructions to calculate a response factor for each virtual machine in the determined neighborhood comprises:

program instructions to calculate an urgency factor for the first virtual machine based upon at least a value reflecting a level of confidence in one or more security alerts associated with the detected threat, a value reflecting strength of the first virtual machine, a value reflecting an ability of security controls to protect the first virtual machine, a value reflecting risk that multi-tenant security controls cannot isolate the first virtual machine, and a value reflecting elapsed time since the detected threat was detected or since the detected threat occurred; and

program instructions to calculate, for each particular virtual machine in the determined neighborhood, the response factor for that particular virtual machine based upon at least a logical distance between that particular virtual machine and the first virtual machine and the urgency factor for the first virtual machine.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2021
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: KYNDRYL, INC.
Reel/Frame 057885/0644 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2015
From: HAMILTON, RICK A., II; HOY, JEFFREY R.; LI, JENNY S.; MULLEN, SHAWN P.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 034934/0501 →