IP Library Granted Patent US 9,584,930
Granted Patent B2
US 9,584,930 · App. 14/623,011 · Granted Feb 28, 2017

Sound environment classification by coordinated sensing using hearing assistance devices

Inventor: David A. Preves (Bradenton, FL)
Assignee: Starkey Laboratories, Inc.
H04R25/407H04R25/00H04R25/505H04R2225/41
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,584,930
App. No.
14/623,011
Granted
Feb 28, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques are disclosed for classifying a sound environment for hearing assistance devices using redundant estimates of an acoustical environment from two hearing assistance devices and accessory devices. In one example, a method for operating a hearing assistance device includes sensing an environmental sound, determining a first classification of the environmental sound, receiving at least one second classification of the environmental sound, comparing the determined first classification and the at least one received second classification, and selecting an operational classification for the hearing assistance device based upon the comparison.

Claims (45)

1. A method for operating a first hearing assistance device using information from a second device, the method comprising:

determining a first classification of sound received by the first hearing assistance device;

receiving a second classification of sound received by the second device; and

determining consensus of the first classification and the second classification using an uncertainty value if the first and second classifications are different to determine an operational classification for the first hearing assistance device,

wherein the second device is a mobile phone.

2. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

when the determined first classification is the same as the second classification, selecting the operational classification to be the determined first classification.

3. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

applying parameter settings for the first hearing assistance device appropriate for the operational classification.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining consensus of the first classification and the second classification using an uncertainty value comprises:

comparing a first classification uncertainty value and a second classification uncertainty value; and

selecting an operational classification based on the lowest of the compared uncertainty values.

5. The method of claim 4 , comprising:

receiving the second classification uncertainty value received by the second device.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein comparing a first classification uncertainty value and a second classification uncertainty value includes:

comparing an error matrix and an error distribution.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein only one of the first hearing assistance device and the second device compares the first classification uncertainty value and the second classification uncertainty value and determines the operational classification.

8. The method of claim 7 comprising:

transmitting the determined operational classification from the only one of the first hearing assistance device and the second device that compares the first classification uncertainty value and the second classification uncertainty value to the other one of the first hearing assistance device and the second device.

9. A method for operating a first hearing assistance device using information from a mobile phone, the method comprising:

determining a first classification of sound received by the first hearing assistance device;

receiving a second classification of sound received by the mobile phone;

if the first classification is the same as the second classification, selecting an operational classification for the first hearing assistance device and the mobile phone to be the determined first classification; and

if the first and second classifications are different, determining consensus of the first classification and the second classification using an uncertainty value to determine the operational classification for the first hearing assistance device and the mobile phone.

10. The method of claim 9 , comprising:

applying parameter settings for the first hearing assistance device and the mobile phone appropriate for the operational classification.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining consensus of the first classification and the second classification using an uncertainty value comprises:

comparing a first classification uncertainty value and a second classification uncertainty value; and

selecting an operational classification based on the lowest of the compared uncertainty values.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein only one of the first hearing assistance device and the mobile phone compares the first classification uncertainty value and the second classification uncertainty value and determines the operational classification.

13. A method for operating a hearing assistance device using information from a wireless communication device, the method comprising:

determining a first classification of sound received by the first hearing assistance device;

receiving a second classification of sound received by the wireless communication device;

if the first classification is the same as the second classification, selecting an operational classification for the hearing assistance device to be the determined first classification;

if the first and second classifications are different, determining consensus of the first classification and the second classification using an uncertainty value to determine the operational classification for the hearing assistance device, including comparing a first classification uncertainty value and a second classification uncertainty value and selecting an operational classification based on the lowest of the compared uncertainty values, wherein comparing a first classification uncertainty value and a second classification uncertainty value includes comparing an error matrix and an error distribution; and

applying parameter settings for the hearing assistance device appropriate for the operational classification.

14. The method of claim 13 , comprising:

receiving the second classification uncertainty value received by the wireless communication device.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein only one of the first hearing assistance device and the wireless communication device compares the first classification uncertainty value and the second classification uncertainty value and determines the operational classification, the method comprising:

transmitting the determined operational classification from the only one of the first hearing assistance device and the wireless communication device that compares the first classification uncertainty value and the second classification uncertainty value to the other one of the first hearing assistance device and the wireless communication device.

16. A method for operating a first hearing assistance device using information from a second device, the method comprising:

determining a first classification of sound received by the first hearing assistance device;

receiving a second classification of sound received by the second device; and

determining consensus of the first classification and the second classification using an uncertainty value if the first and second classifications are different to determine an operational classification for the first hearing assistance device including comparing a first classification uncertainty value and a second classification uncertainty value and selecting an operational classification based on the lowest of the compared uncertainty values,

wherein comparing a first classification uncertainty value and a second classification uncertainty value includes comparing an error matrix and an error distribution.

Assignments (2)
NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Aug 25, 2018
From: STARKEY LABORATORIES, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 046944/0689 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 2, 2016
From: PREVES, DAVID A.
To: STARKEY LABORATORIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 037869/0202 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13725579 · Dec 21, 2012
Related Publication 20150296309A1 · Oct 15, 2015