IP Library Granted Patent US 9,443,042
Granted Patent B1
US 9,443,042 · App. 14/628,091 · Granted Sep 13, 2016

Systems and methods for evaluation of a superabrasive element

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,443,042
App. No.
14/628,091
Granted
Sep 13, 2016
Kind
B1
Abstract

Embodiments of systems and methods are disclosed for evaluating a superabrasive material by a three-dimensional model generated using a computed tomography scanner. The model is analyzed to identify a superabrasive matrix within the model and at least one performance characteristic of the superabrasive material is determined according to at least one property of the superabrasive matrix. Methods are also disclosed for characterizing crystal-to-crystal bonding regions and non-superabrasive material within an interstitial matrix of the superabrasive matrix.

Claims (38)

1. A method for evaluating a superabrasive element, the method comprising:

scanning the superabrasive element with a computed tomography (“CT”) scanner;

generating a model of the superabrasive element based at least partially on an output of the CT scanner; and

identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the model including distinguishing between materials in the leached region according to respective radiopacities thereof including identifying portions of an interstitial matrix.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the model includes determining at least one property of the leached region.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the model includes determining a leach depth profile of the leached region.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein distinguishing between materials in the leached region according to respective radiopacities thereof includes identifying portions of the interstitial matrix having a radiopacity less than a minimum threshold radiopacity.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the model includes identifying portions of the superabrasive element having a radiopacity corresponding to a gas.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the model includes identifying portions of the superabrasive element that includes non-superabrasive material therein.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the model includes determining at least one of a size or roughness of at least one pore of the leached region.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining at least one performance characteristic of the superabrasive element at least partially based on the leached region.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising identifying a superabrasive matrix within the model.

10. The method of claim 9 further comprising determining at least one of a property of the superabrasive matrix.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the model includes determining a composition gradient in the leached region.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein scanning the superabrasive element with a CT scanner includes scanning the superabrasive element with at least one of an X-ray CT scanner or a CT neutron scanner.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein scanning the superabrasive element with a CT scanner includes scanning the superabrasive element using at least one of a micro-CT X-ray scanner or a nano-CT X-ray scanner.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein generating a model of the superabrasive element based at least partially on an output of the CT scanner includes computationally generating a three-dimensional model.

15. A method for evaluating a polycrystalline diamond element, the method comprising:

generating a series of two-dimensional images of the polycrystalline diamond element;

generating a model of the polycrystalline diamond element based at least partially on the series of two-dimensional images of the polycrystalline diamond element; and

identifying a leached region in the polycrystalline diamond element at least partially based on the model including distinguishing between materials in the leached region according to respective radiopacities thereof including identifying portions of an interstitial matrix.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein identifying a leached region in the polycrystalline diamond element at least partially based on the model includes determining at least one property of the leached region.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein identifying a leached region in the polycrystalline diamond element at least partially based on the model includes determining a leach depth profile of the leached region.

18. The method of claim 15 wherein identifying a leached region in the polycrystalline diamond element at least partially based on the model includes identifying portions of the interstitial matrix of the polycrystalline diamond element having a radiopacity less than a minimum threshold radiopacity.

19. The method of claim 15 wherein identifying a leached region in the polycrystalline diamond element at least partially based on the model includes identifying portions of the interstitial matrix of the polycrystalline diamond element having a radiopacity corresponding to a gas.

20. The method of claim 16 wherein the polycrystalline diamond element is bonded to a substrate, and wherein the polycrystalline diamond element includes the leached region having a leach depth profile.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein identifying a leached region in the polycrystalline diamond element at least partially based on the model includes determining the leach depth profile of the leached region.

22. A non-transitory computer readable medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon that when executed by a processor causes the processor to perform a method, the method comprising:

generating a model of a superabrasive element at least partially based on data generated from a computed tomography (“CT”) scanner scanning the superabrasive element; and

identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the model including distinguishing between materials in the leached region according to respective radiopacities thereof including identifying portions of an interstitial matrix.

23. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 22 wherein the method further includes directing the CT scanner to scan the superabrasive element.

24. A computer system, comprising:

at least one processor; and

a memory to which the at least one processor is operably coupled, the memory storing computer executable instructions thereon that when executed by the at least one processor causes the at least one processor to perform a method, the method comprising:

directing a X-ray system to scan a superabrasive element;

generating a series of two-dimensional images of the superabrasive element at least partially based on data generated from the X-ray system scanning the superabrasive element; and

identifying a leached region in the superabrasive element at least partially based on the series of two-dimensional images including distinguishing between materials in the leached region according to respective radiopacities thereof and including identifying portions of an interstitial matrix.

25. The computer system of claim 24 wherein the X-ray system includes at least one of an X-ray computed tomography (“CT”) scanner.

Assignments (5)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2025
From: US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION
To: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 074973/0089 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jul 17, 2025
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: CHAMPIONX LLC; APERGY ESP SYSTEMS, LLC; APERGY BMCS ACQUISITION CORP; HARBISON-FISCHER, INC.; NORRIS RODS, INC.,; NORRIS RODS, INC.,; NORRISEAL-WELLMARK, INC.; PCS FERGUSON, INC.; QUARTZDYNE, INC.; US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 072004/0019 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 7, 2022
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: ACE DOWNHOLE, LLC; HARBISON-FISCHER, INC.; NORRIS RODS, INC.; PCS FERGUSON, INC.; QUARTZDYNE, INC.; SPIRIT GLOBAL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.; THETA OILFIELD SERVICES, INC.; APERGY BMCS ACQUISITION CORP.; NORRISEAL-WELLMARK, INC.; US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION; WINDROCK, INC.
Reel/Frame 060305/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2020
From: ACE DOWNHOLE, LLC; APERGY BMCS ACQUISITION CORP.; HARBISON-FISCHER, INC.; NORRIS RODS, INC.; NORRISEAL-WELLMARK, INC.; PCS FERGUSON, INC.; QUARTZDYNE, INC.; SPIRIT GLOBAL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.; THETA OILFIELD SERVICES, INC.; US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION; WINDROCK, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053790/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 9, 2018
From: APERGY (DELAWARE) FORMATION, INC.; APERGY BMCS ACQUISITION CORP.; APERGY ENERGY AUTOMATION, LLC; HARBISON-FISCHER, INC.; NORRISEAL-WELLMARK, INC.; PCS FERGUSON, INC.; QUARTZDYNE, INC.; SPIRIT GLOBAL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.; US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION; WINDROCK, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 046117/0015 →