IP Library Granted Patent US 10,121,015
Granted Patent B2
US 10,121,015 · App. 14/629,436 · Granted Nov 6, 2018

Management of data privacy and security in a pervasive computing environment

Inventors: Tara Lemmey (San Francisco, CA); Stanislav Vonog (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: LENS VENTURES, LLC
G06F21/62B64D47/08G05D1/0077G05D1/102G06F21/6218G06F21/6245G06F21/6254G06Q50/188G08G5/006G08G5/045H04L63/0861H04L63/10H04L63/20B64C39/024B64C2201/127G06F17/30H04L2463/101
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,121,015
App. No.
14/629,436
Granted
Nov 6, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method to provide negotiation control to data such that a person or entity can negotiate the use of data gathered beyond what is needed for a particular use by a third party transaction.

Claims (68)

1. A method for autonomously negotiating the use of collected data comprising:

collecting a raw dataset from a data trafficker device, where a data trafficker device is a device which collects and/or records in text, audio, and/or photographic format;

identifying interested parties to the raw dataset, wherein an interested party is the subject matter of the raw dataset, or has an ownership interest or regulatory rights in the raw dataset;

identifying, by a computing device, contextual information regarding the raw dataset;

identifying, by the computing device, transmission protocols used to communicate with a requesting party seeking use of the raw dataset;

attaching, by the computing device, negotiation policy executable code to the raw dataset including a set of configured parameters corresponding to usage of the raw dataset allowed by the interested parties, wherein the set of configured parameters are also based on the contextual information regarding the raw dataset, and wherein the set of configured parameters are also based on the transmission protocols used to communicate with the requesting party;

initiating, by the computing device, an autonomous negotiation between the computing device and the requesting party seeking use of the raw dataset, wherein an autonomous negotiation comprises an investigation and response process according to the set of configured parameters to permit the requesting party access and use of the raw dataset based upon results of the investigation and response process, wherein the autonomous negotiation includes:

determining that the raw dataset includes data associated with a data security wrapper,

determine a purpose of data collection regarding the data,

determine data rights to accomplish the purpose,

determine a negotiation strategy based on the data rights, and

negotiate data rights based on the negotiation strategy; and

issuing, by the computing device, a permitted use verdict to the requesting party based on the results of the investigation and response process, wherein the permitted use verdict allows processing of the data based on the data rights negotiated using the negotiation strategy.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of configured parameters dictate that the permitted use verdict would differ based one upon one or more of the following:

the identity of the requesting party or the use the raw dataset is requested for.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the permitted use verdict directs that the raw dataset is deleted either after use or after a specified time has elapsed.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the permitted use verdict directs that the raw dataset is at least partially obscured.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes evaluating dataset metadata or digital watermarks to identify interested parties.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes employing an internet crawling agent.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein said raw dataset is a credit card transaction and said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes evaluating the purchaser information to identify interested parties.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said raw dataset is identifying information about a person or entity and said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes the person or entity identified by the raw dataset.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said attaching negotiation policy executable code attaches negotiation policy executable code with selected configured parameters based on select content of the raw dataset.

10. An electronic device, comprising:

one or more processors; and

memory storing instructions, wherein the processor is configured to execute the instructions such that the processor and memory are configured to:

collect a raw dataset from a data trafficker device, where a data trafficker device is a device which collects and/or records in text, audio, and/or photographic format;

identify interested parties to the raw dataset, wherein an interested party is the subject matter of the raw dataset, or has an ownership interest or regulatory rights in the raw dataset;

identify contextual information regarding the raw dataset;

identify transmission protocols used to communicate with a requesting party seeking use of the raw dataset;

attach negotiation policy executable code to the raw dataset including a set of configured parameters corresponding to usage of the raw dataset allowed by the interested parties, wherein the set of configured parameters are also based on the contextual information regarding the raw dataset, and wherein the set of configured parameters are also based on the transmission protocols used to communicate with the requesting party;

initiate an autonomous negotiation between the computing device and the requesting party seeking use of the raw dataset, wherein an autonomous negotiation comprises an investigation and response process according to the set of configured parameters to permit the requesting party access and use of the raw dataset based upon results of the investigation and response process, wherein the autonomous negotiation includes:

determining that the raw dataset includes data associated with a data security wrapper,

determine a purpose of data collection regarding the data,

determine data rights to accomplish the purpose,

determine a negotiation strategy based on the data rights, and

negotiate data rights based on the negotiation strategy; and

issue a permitted use verdict to the requesting party based on the results of the investigation and response process, wherein the permitted use verdict allows processing of the data based on the data rights negotiated using the negotiation strategy.

11. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the set of configured parameters dictate that the permitted use verdict would differ based one upon one or more of the following:

the identity of the requesting party or the use the raw dataset is requested for.

12. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the permitted use verdict directs that the raw dataset is deleted either after use or after a specified time has elapsed.

13. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the permitted use verdict directs that the raw dataset is at least partially obscured.

14. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes evaluating dataset metadata or digital watermarks to identify interested parties.

15. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes employing an internet crawling agent.

16. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein said raw dataset is a credit card transaction and said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes evaluating the purchaser information to identify interested parties.

17. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein said raw dataset is identifying information about a person or entity and said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes the person or entity identified by the raw dataset.

18. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein said attaching negotiation policy executable code attaches negotiation policy executable code with selected configured parameters based on select content of the raw dataset.

19. A computer program product, comprising one or more non-transitory computer-readable media having computer program instructions stored therein, the computer program instructions being configured such that, when executed by one or more computing devices, the computer program instructions cause the one or more computing devices to:

collect a raw dataset from a data trafficker device, where a data trafficker device is a device which collects and/or records in text, audio, and/or photographic format;

identify interested parties to the raw dataset, wherein an interested party is the subject matter of the raw dataset, or has an ownership interest or regulatory rights in the raw dataset;

identify contextual information regarding the raw dataset;

identify transmission protocols used to communicate with a requesting party seeking use of the raw dataset;

attach negotiation policy executable code to the raw dataset including a set of configured parameters corresponding to usage of the raw dataset allowed by the interested parties, wherein the set of configured parameters are also based on the contextual information regarding the raw dataset, and wherein the set of configured parameters are also based on the transmission protocols used to communicate with the requesting party;

initiate an autonomous negotiation between the computing device and the requesting party seeking use of the raw dataset, wherein an autonomous negotiation comprises an investigation and response process according to the set of configured parameters to permit the requesting party access and use of the raw dataset based upon results of the investigation and response process, wherein the autonomous negotiation includes:

determining that the raw dataset includes data associated with a data security wrapper,

determine a purpose of data collection regarding the data,

determine data rights to accomplish the purpose,

determine a negotiation strategy based on the data rights, and

negotiate data rights based on the negotiation strategy; and

issue a permitted use verdict to the requesting party based on the results of the investigation and response process, wherein the permitted use verdict allows processing of the data based on the data rights negotiated using the negotiation strategy.

20. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein the set of configured parameters dictate that the permitted use verdict would differ based one upon one or more of the following:

the identity of the requesting party or the use the raw dataset is requested for.

21. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein the permitted use verdict directs that the raw dataset is deleted either after use or after a specified time has elapsed.

22. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein the permitted use verdict directs that the raw dataset is at least partially obscured.

23. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes evaluating dataset metadata or digital watermarks to identify interested parties.

24. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes employing an internet crawling agent.

25. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein said raw dataset is a credit card transaction and said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes evaluating the purchaser information to identify interested parties.

26. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein said raw dataset is identifying information about a person or entity and said identifying interested parties to the raw dataset includes the person or entity identified by the raw dataset.

27. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein said attaching negotiation policy executable code attaches negotiation policy executable code with selected configured parameters based on select content of the raw dataset.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 3, 2016
From: LEMMEY, TARA; VONOG, STANISLAV
To: LENS VENTURES, LLC
Reel/Frame 037881/0877 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61942852 · Feb 21, 2014
Related Publication 20150242648A1 · Aug 27, 2015
Cited By (1)
US 12,277,617