Location option control for minimization of drive test in LTE systems
A method of providing location option control for Minimization of Drive Test (MDT) in LTE systems is provided. In one embodiment, a UE or an eNB receives an MDT location request that comprises an MDT location option configuration having one or more location options. The UE or eNB determines a first location option based on the MDT location option configuration and initiates positioning for MDT measurements, reporting, and logging according to the first location option. In one novel aspect, each location option is associated with a priority. In addition to MDT measurements, reporting, and logging, a UE determines the best positioning procedure from a list of available location options. In one novel aspect, under a specific positioning objective, the UE prioritizes the list of available location options based on the signal strength and/or quality of cellular and WLAN signals.
1. A method, comprising:
(a) determining a first signal strength and/or quality provided by a cellular radio access technology (RAT) by a wireless device;
(b) determining a second signal strength and/or quality provided by a wireless local area network (WLAN) by the wireless device; and
(c) selecting a positioning procedure from a list of location options, wherein the positioning procedure is selected to best meet a positioning objective based on the determination in (a) and (b).
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the list of location options includes Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), Assisted GNSS (AGNSS), LTE Observed Time Difference of Arrival (LTE OTDOA) system, WiFi positioning, and Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) positioning.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the wireless device determines a priority order of executing each location option based on the determining in (a) and (b).
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the positioning objective includes reducing response time.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein a WiFi positioning option has the fastest response time.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the position objective include improving accuracy.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning option has the best accuracy.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the positioning objective includes reducing power consumption.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein an LTE Observed Time Difference of Arrival (LTE OTDOA) positioning option has the least power consumption.
10. A wireless device, comprising:
a cellular transceiver that determines a first signal strength and/or quality provided by a cellular radio access technology (RAT) by a wireless device;
a WiFi transceiver that determines a second signal strength and/or quality provided by a wireless local area network (WLAN) by the wireless device; and
a location option controller that selects a positioning procedure from a list of location options, wherein the positioning procedure is selected to best meet a positioning objective based on the determination in (a) and (b).
11. The device of claim 10 , wherein the list of location options includes Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), Assisted GNSS (AGNSS), LTE Observed Time Difference of Arrival (LTE OTDOA) system, WiFi positioning, and Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) positioning.
12. The device of claim 10 , wherein the wireless device determines a priority order of executing each location option based on the determining in (a) and (b).
13. The device of claim 10 , wherein the positioning objective includes reducing response time.
14. The device of claim 13 , wherein a WiFi positioning option has the fastest response time.
15. The device of claim 10 , wherein the position objective include improving accuracy.
16. The device of claim 15 , wherein a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning option has the best accuracy.
17. The device of claim 10 , wherein the positioning objective includes reducing power consumption.
18. The device of claim 17 , wherein an LTE Observed Time Difference of Arrival (LTE OTDOA) positioning option has the least power consumption.