IP Library Granted Patent US 9,805,218
Granted Patent B2
US 9,805,218 · App. 14/687,825 · Granted Oct 31, 2017

Technique for data loss prevention through clipboard operations

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,805,218
App. No.
14/687,825
Granted
Oct 31, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques describe preventing sensitive data from being misappropriated during a clipboard operation. A copy operation for data being copied to a clipboard is intercepted. Information describing a first application from which the data was copied is retrieved. The data and the information is stored into the clipboard. A paste operation is evaluated based on the data and the information is evaluated against a policy to determine whether the paste operation should be blocked.

Claims (70)

1. A method comprising:

intercepting a copy operation for data being copied to a clipboard;

retrieving information describing a first application from which the data was copied, wherein the information describing the first application includes a process ID of the first application;

storing the data and the information into the clipboard;

intercepting a paste operation for the data to be pasted into a second application;

determining whether a process ID of the second application matches the process ID of the first application;

determining whether the paste operation is user-initiated or application-initiated based on whether a system message queue describes a paste operation corresponding to the intercepted paste operation;

determining that the data includes sensitive data based on a policy; and

determining whether to block or allow the paste operation based on:

the policy,

whether the process ID of the second application matches the process ID of the first application, and

whether the paste operation is user-initiated or application-initiated.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

retrieving the data and the information from the clipboard; and

upon determining that the information matches with information describing the second application, allowing the paste operation to proceed.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

upon determining that the information describing the first application and information describing the second application do not match, determining the paste operation is application-initiated; and

allowing the paste operation to proceed.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the information describing the first application includes at least one of a name of the first application and a window title of the first application.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

upon determining the process ID of the second application does not match the process ID of the first application, determining the paste operation is user-initiated; and

blocking the paste operation.

6. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions, which, when executed on a processor, perform an operation, the operation comprising:

intercepting a copy operation for data being copied to a clipboard;

retrieving information describing a first application from which the data was copied, wherein the information describing the first application includes a process ID of the first application;

storing the data and the information into the clipboard;

intercepting a paste operation for the data to be pasted into a second application;

determining whether a process ID of the second application matches the process ID of the first application;

determining whether the paste operation is user-initiated or application-initiated based on whether a system message queue describes a paste operation corresponding to the intercepted paste operation;

determining that the data includes sensitive data based on a policy; and

determining whether to block or allow the paste operation based on:

the policy,

whether the process ID of the second application matches the process ID of the first application, and

whether the paste operation is user-initiated or application-initiated.

7. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 6 , wherein the operation further comprises:

retrieving the data and the information from the clipboard; and

upon determining that the information matches with information describing the second application, allowing the paste operation to proceed.

8. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 6 , wherein the operation further comprises:

upon determining that the information describing the first application and information describing the second application do not match, determining the paste operation is application-initiated; and

allowing the paste operation to proceed.

9. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein the information describing the first application includes at least one of a name of the first application and a window title of the first application.

10. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 6 , further comprising:

upon determining the process ID of the second application does not match the process ID of the first application, determining the paste operation is user-initiated; and

blocking the paste operation.

11. A system, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory storing program code, which, when executed on the processor, performs an operation,

the operation comprising:

intercepting a copy operation for data being copied to a clipboard,

retrieving information describing a first application from which the data was copied,

wherein the information describing the first application includes a process ID of the first application,

storing the data and the information into the clipboard,

intercepting a paste operation for the data to be pasted into a second application,

determining whether a process ID of the second application matches the process ID of the first application,

determining whether the paste operation is user-initiated or application-initiated based on whether a system message queue describes a paste operation corresponding to the intercepted paste operation,

determining that the data includes sensitive data based on a policy, and

determining whether to block or allow the paste operation based on:

the policy;

whether the process ID of the second application matches the process ID of the first application; and

whether the paste operation is user-initiated or application-initiated.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the operation further comprises:

retrieving the data and the information from the clipboard; and

upon determining that the information matches with information describing the second application, allowing the paste operation to proceed.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the operation further comprises:

upon determining that the information describing the first application and information describing the second application do not match, determining the paste operation is application-initiated; and

allowing the paste operation to proceed.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the information describing the first application includes at least one of a name of the first application and a window title of the first application.

15. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

upon determining the process ID of the second application does not match the process ID of the first application, determining the paste operation is user-initiated; and

blocking the paste operation.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2019
From: SYMANTEC CORPORATION
To: CA, INC.
Reel/Frame 051144/0918 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 11, 2017
From: SARIN, SUMIT MANMOHAN
To: SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 042344/0764 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2015
From: MANMOHAN, SUMIT SARIN; MODAK, SUMANT; SHINDE, AMIT; CHATURVEDI, BISHNU
To: SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 035419/0627 →