System and method of a supply chain retail process manager
A system and method are disclosed for analyzing the maturity of one or more supply chain entities according to competencies of an omni-channel retailer. The one or more supply chain entities including a retail manager that assesses the one or more supply chain entities according to one or more competencies and determines one or more maturity gaps associated with the one or more competencies. The retail manger further identifies one or more transition projects that fill the one or more maturity gaps and roadmaps one or more transition activities that generate the one or more identified transition projects. The one or more supply chain entities further adjusts an inventory of one or more products at least partially based on the one or more roadmapped transition activities.
1. A system, comprising:
a supply chain network comprising one or more retailers comprising an inventory of one or more products at one or more locations;
a computer comprising a memory and a processor, the computer configured to:
identify one or more competencies of the one or more retailers in the supply chain network;
determine an initial maturity level for the one or more retailers according to one or more level-one process markers and receive a final maturity level for the one or more level-one process markers;
determine one or more maturity gaps associated with the one or more competencies of the one or more retailers and according to the difference between the initial maturity level and the final maturity level;
identify one or more transition projects that fill the one or more determined maturity gaps by mapping the one or more transition projects on a computer display using a bubble chart, wherein the bubble chart is mapped according to a value versus complexity with bubbles in the bubble chart sized according to resource needs corresponding to the one or more transition projects;
roadmap one or more transition activities that generate the one or more identified transition projects that fill the one or more determined maturity gaps; and
adjust the inventory of the one or more products of the one or more retailers based on the one or more roadmapped transition activities.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer is further configured to:
generate a retail process methodology hierarchy comprising one or more high-level process markers, the one or more level-one process markers, and one or more level-two process markers; and
assess the one or more retailers according to the one or more level-two process markers according to the one or more competencies.
3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the computer is further configured to:
generate a score for the one or more level-two process markers according to one or more maturity levels.
4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the computer is further configured to:
calculate a return on investment and a cost for each of the one or more identified transition projects;
determine an estimate of capital outlays for the one or more retailers; and
roadmap one or more transition activities based, at least in part, on the calculated return on investment and cost and determined estimate of capital outlays.
5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the computer is further configured to:
sort the one or more transition projects according to one or more of project complexity, project value, resource need, and organizational change impact.
6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the maturity levels are chosen from one or more of innocence, understanding, competence, and excellence.
7. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
identifying, by a computer comprising a memory and a processor, one or more competencies of one or more retailers comprising an inventory of one or more products at one or more locations in a supply chain network;
determining, by the computer, an initial maturity level for the one or more retailers according to one or more level-one process markers and receiving, by the computer, a final maturity level for the one or more level-one process markers;
determining, by the computer, one or more maturity gaps associated with the one or more competencies of the one or more retailers and according to the difference between the initial maturity level and the final maturity level;
identifying, by the computer, one or more transition projects that fill the one or more determined maturity gaps by mapping the one or more transition projects on a computer display using a bubble chart, wherein the bubble chart is mapped according to a value versus complexity with bubbles in the bubble chart sized according to resource needs corresponding to the one or more transition projects;
roadmapping, by the computer, one or more transition activities that generate the one or more identified transition projects that fill the one or more determined maturity gaps; and
adjusting, by the computer, the inventory of the one or more products of the one or more retailers based on the one or more roadmapped transition activities.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , further comprising:
generating, by the computer, a retail process methodology hierarchy comprising one or more high-level process markers; the one or more level-one process markers, and one or more level-two process markers; and
assessing, by the computer, the one or more retailers according to the one or more level-two process markers according to the one or more competencies.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:
generating, by the computer, a score for the one or more level-two process markers according to one or more maturity levels.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising:
calculating, by the computer, a return on investment and a cost for each of the one or more identified transition projects;
determining, by the computer, an estimate of capital outlays for the one or more retailers; and
roadmapping, by the computer, one or more transition activities based, at least in part, on the calculated return on investment and cost and determined estimate of capital outlays.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , further comprising:
sorting, by the computer, the one or more transition projects according to one or more of project complexity, project value, resource need, and organizational change impact.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the maturity levels are chosen from one or more of innocence, understanding, competence, and excellence.
13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium embodied with software, the software when executed using one or more computers is configured to:
identify one or more competencies of one or more retailers comprising an inventory of one or more products at one or more locations in a supply chain network;
determine an initial maturity level for the one or more retailers according to one or more level-one process markers and receive a final maturity level for the one or more level-one process markers;
determine one or more maturity gaps associated with the one or more competencies of the one or more retailers and according to the difference between the initial maturity level and the final maturity level;
identify one or more transition projects that fill the one or more determined maturity gaps by mapping the one or more transition projects on a computer display using a bubble chart, wherein the bubble chart is mapped according to a value versus complexity with bubbles in the bubble chart sized according to resource needs corresponding to the one or more transition projects;
roadmap one or more transition activities that generate the one or more identified transition projects that fill the one or more determined maturity gaps; and
adjust the inventory of the one or more products of the one or more retailers based on the one or more roadmapped transition activities.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , the software further configured to:
generate a retail process methodology hierarchy comprising one or more high-level process markers; the one or more level-one process markers, and one or more level-two process markers; and
assess the one or more retailers according to the one or more level-two process markers according to the one or more competencies.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , the software further configured to:
generate a score for the one or more level-two process markers according to one or more maturity levels.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , the software further configured to:
calculate a return on investment and a cost for each of the one or more identified transition projects;
determine an estimate of capital outlays for the one or more retailers; and
roadmap one or more transition activities based, at least in part, on the calculated return on investment and cost and determined estimate of capital outlays.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , the software further configured to:
sort the one or more transition projects according to one or more of project complexity, project value, resource need, and organizational change impact.