IP Library Granted Patent US 9,805,587
Granted Patent B2
US 9,805,587 · App. 14/716,087 · Granted Oct 31, 2017

DIY monitoring apparatus and method

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,805,587
App. No.
14/716,087
Granted
Oct 31, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a software application used on mobile devices that enables professional monitoring services to DIY monitoring systems that lack an ability to communicate with remote monitoring facilities. In one embodiment, alert messages are transmitted by a monitoring system gateway and received by a personal communication device. The alert messages indicate occurrences of events at a monitored premises. When the software application determines that an incoming communication is an alert message, an indication is provided to a user of the mobile device that an event has occurred at the premises, and giving the user a predetermined time period in which to respond to the indication. If the user fails to respond to the indication within a predetermined time period, a message is transmitted to a remote monitoring facility, alerting the remote monitoring facility of the event.

Claims (40)

1. A non-transient, processor-readable medium having program instructions stored thereon, which when executed by a processor, performs a method comprising:

receiving an incoming communication by a personal communication device via a communication interface;

determining, by the processor within the personal communication device, that the incoming communication is an alert message from a monitoring system;

providing by the processor, an indication to a user via a user interface that an event has occurred at a premises monitored by the monitoring system;

determining, by the processor, that the user has failed to respond to the indication within a predetermined time period;

matching a standardized alarm code stored in a memory with the type of event that has occurred at the premises; and

transmitting a message, by the processor via a transmitter, to a remote monitoring facility when the user does not respond to the indication within the predetermined time period, the message comprising the standardized alarm code.

2. The non-transient, processor-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the instructions for determining that the incoming communication is an alert message comprise instructions for:

comparing an origination identification code in the incoming communication to a monitoring system identification code stored in the memory within the personal communication device; and

determining that the incoming communication comprises an alert message from the monitoring system when the origination identification code in the incoming communication matches the monitoring system identification code.

3. The non-transient, processor-readable medium of claim 2 , wherein the origination identification code comprises a phone number associated with the monitoring system.

4. The non-transient, processor-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the instructions for sending a message to a remote monitoring facility when the user does not respond to the indication within a predetermined time period comprise instructions for:

starting a timer when the processor determines that an alert message has been received from the home security gateway, the timer set to the predetermined time period; and

sending the message to the remote monitoring facility when the timer expires and no response from the user was received during the predetermined time period.

5. The non-transient, processor-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring system is not capable of directly communicating with the remote monitoring facility.

6. The non-transient, processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising:

establishing voice communications with the remote monitoring facility after transmitting the message.

7. The non-transient, processor-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the message comprises an identification code that identifies an origination of the alert message.

8. The non-transient, processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing the incoming communication to the user via the user interface in accordance with a format of the alert message.

9. A method, performed by a personal communication device, comprising:

receiving an incoming communication via a communication interface;

determining, by a processor within the personal communication device, that the incoming communication is an alert message from a monitoring system;

providing an indication to a user via a user interface that an event has occurred at a premises monitored by the monitoring system;

determining that the user has failed to respond to the indication within a predetermined time period;

matching a standardized alarm code stored in a memory with the type of event that has occurred at the premises; and

transmitting a message to a remote monitoring facility when the user does not respond to the indication within the predetermined time period, the message comprising the standardized alarm code.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the instructions for determining that the incoming communication is an alert message comprise instructions for:

comparing an origination identification code in the incoming communication to a monitoring system identification code stored in the memory within the personal communication device; and

determining that the incoming communication comprises an alert message from the monitoring system when the origination identification code in the incoming communication matches the monitoring system identification code.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the origination identification code comprises a phone number associated with the monitoring system.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the instructions for sending a message to a remote monitoring facility when the user does not respond to the indication within a predetermined time period comprise instructions for:

starting a timer when the processor determines that an alert message has been received from the home security gateway, the timer set to the predetermined time period; and

sending the message to the remote monitoring facility when the timer expires and no response from the user was received during the predetermined time period.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the monitoring system is not capable of directly communicating with the remote monitoring facility.

14. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

establishing voice communications with the remote monitoring facility after transmitting the message.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the message comprises an identification code that identifies an origination of the alert message.

16. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

providing the incoming communication to the user via the user interface in accordance with a format of the alert message.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2025
From: ECOLINK INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
Reel/Frame 069825/0183 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2024
From: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 067417/0402 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 12, 2015
From: LAMB, MICHAEL
To: ECOLINK INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 036307/0624 →