IP Library Granted Patent US 9,853,867
Granted Patent B2
US 9,853,867 · App. 14/716,220 · Granted Dec 26, 2017

Method and apparatus to determine network quality

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,853,867
App. No.
14/716,220
Granted
Dec 26, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Aspects of the invention may involve systems and methods. A system may score the experience of accessed services. The system may include a probe connected to a telecommunications network and configured to transmit metrics at regular intervals. The system may also include a network monitor configured to: receive data from the probe, transform the received data into key performance indicators, generate a set of key quality indicators based on the key performance indicators, categorize one or more subscribers, and calculate a Quality of Experience index based on the categorized subscribers.

Claims (34)

1. A system for scoring an experience of accessed services comprising:

a probe, the probe connected to a telecommunications network, the probe configured to transmit metrics at regular intervals; and

a network monitor comprising one or more processors, the network monitor configured to:

receive data from the probe;

transform the data into key performance indicators;

generate a set of key quality indicators based on the key performance indicators;

categorize one or more subscribers as one of: satisfied, tolerating, or frustrated, based on the set of key quality indicators, to yield categorized subscribers;

calculate a Quality of Experience index based on the categorized subscribers;

aggregate the Quality of Experience Index by at least one of subscribers, devices, locations, or applications, to yield an aggregated Quality of Experience;

identify the aggregated Quality of Experience as a poor experience;

indicate that a possible root cause of the poor experience is due to at least one of issues in a user device, in an access network, in a core network, or in a content provider server.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the probe is passive.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the probe transmits data at one minute intervals.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the probe generates a data feed for each procedure type.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the procedure type includes: GTPv1, GTPv2, Diameter user authentication, DNS for address resolutions, and user plane sessions.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the probe generates one or more records for each detected subscriber accessing the telecommunications network.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the set of key quality indicators includes indicators in one or more performance zones: service accessibility, service retainability, and service performance.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more performance zones include service accessibility, service retainability, and service performance.

9. A method for scoring an experience of accessed services, the method comprising:

receiving, by a network monitor, data from one or more network probes, the one or more network probes located on a telecommunications network;

transforming, by the network monitor, the data received from the one or more network probes into key performance indicators;

generating, by the network monitor, a set of key quality indicators based on the key performance indicators;

categorizing, by the network monitor, one or more subscribers of the accessed services as one of: satisfied, tolerating, or frustrated, based on the set of key quality indicators, to yield categorized subscribers; and

calculating a quality of experience for each of the categorized subscribers, to yield calculated quality of experiences;

aggregating the calculated quality of experiences by at least one of subscribers, devices, locations, or applications, to yield an aggregated quality of experience measurement;

identifying the aggregated quality of experience measurement as a poor experience;

indicating that a possible root cause of the poor experience is due to at least one of issues in a user device, in an access network, in a core network, or in a content provider server.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more network probes are passive.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more network probes transmit data at one minute intervals.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more network probes generate one data feed per procedure type.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the procedure type includes: GTPv1, GTPv2, diameter user authentication, DNS for address resolutions, and user plane sessions.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more network probes generate one or more records for each detected subscriber accessing the telecommunications network.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the set of key quality indicators include indicators in one or more performance zones.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the one or more performance zones include service accessibility, service retainability, and service performance.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2021
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BDC, INC. (AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO GOLDMAN SACHS MIDDLE MARKET LENDING CORP.), AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: EMPIRIX INC.
Reel/Frame 055988/0203 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2018
From: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR AGENT TO PACIFIC WESTERN BANK (AS SUCCESSOR TO CAPITALSOURCE BANK)
To: EMPIRIX INC.
Reel/Frame 046982/0131 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2018
From: STELLUS CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
To: EMPIRIX INC.
Reel/Frame 046982/0170 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2018
From: EMPIRIX INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS MIDDLE MARKET LENDING CORP.
Reel/Frame 046983/0508 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 2, 2018
From: PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, AS AGENT (FKA CAPITALSOURCE BANK)
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 045691/0864 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 27, 2017
From: EMPIRIX, INC.
To: PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 042170/0584 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 27, 2017
From: EMPIRIX, INC.
To: STELLUS CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 042351/0606 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2015
From: BACCARANI, ANGELO
To: EMPIRIX INC.
Reel/Frame 035688/0526 →