IP Library Granted Patent US 9,495,636
Granted Patent B2
US 9,495,636 · App. 14/834,202 · Granted Nov 15, 2016

Determining a threat level for one or more individuals

Inventors: Richard Torgersrud (San Francisco, CA); Christopher Ditto (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: INTELMATE LLC
G06N5/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,495,636
App. No.
14/834,202
Granted
Nov 15, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and computer-implemented method for determining a threat level for one or more individuals includes accessing a data structure to obtain aggregated data stored therein, wherein the aggregated data comprises at least one of communication history data or transaction history data for one or more individuals. One or more predetermined metrics are applied to the obtained aggregated data, to determine threat level information for the one or more individuals. The determined threat level information is provided for display.

Claims (40)

1. A computer-implemented method for determining a threat level for one or more individuals, the method comprising:

requesting authorization to access a communication and transaction database in a controlled facility through a communications firewall;

receiving, from the communication and transaction database, a personal history data and a transaction history data associated with the one or more individuals for a pre-selected period of time;

forming an aggregated data with the personal history data received from the communication and transaction database, the aggregated data comprising statistical data from one of the communication history data and the transaction history data;

applying a predetermined metric to the aggregated data, the predetermined metric comprising a weighted sum of the aggregated data;

determining a threat level category for the one or more individuals based on the predetermined metric, wherein the threat level category is indicative of a level of likelihood that the one or more individuals will display violent behavior; and

displaying the determined threat level category to an authorized user upon a request.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein displaying the determined threat level information comprises displaying one of a likely violent category, a possibly violent category, and an unlikely violent category.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the personal history data comprises receiving one of the communication history data and the transaction history data from each individual in a population comprising the one or more individuals.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the personal history data associated with the one or more individuals comprises receiving at least one of a telephone call, a voicemail, an onsite phone visit, an onsite video visit, a photo message, a video message, and a text message.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the personal history data comprises receiving a transaction history data including a deposit, or a spending record for the one or more individuals.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein applying a predetermined metric to the aggregated data comprises correlating a number of voicemails in the communication history of the one or more individuals with a violent behavior.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving, subsequent to determining the threat level category, an indication of an actual threat data performed by one of the one or more individuals.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising alerting the authorized user about the one or more individuals based on the determined threat level category.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein displaying the determined threat level category to the authorized user upon a request comprises one of automatically generating the request for the authorized user or manually generating the request by the authorized user.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the authorized user is a corrections staff and the request is a request for a threat index report, and further comprising providing a recommendation to perform one of: interviewing the one or more individuals, moving the one or more individuals, or increasing attention to the one or more individuals based on the threat level category.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the threat level category for each of the one or more individuals comprises entering a number of known arrests or a cumulative time spent detained for the one or more individuals.

12. A system for determining a threat level for one or more individuals, the system comprising:

one or more processors; and

a non-transitory machine-readable medium comprising instructions stored therein, which when executed by the processors, cause the processors to perform operations comprising:

requesting authorization to access a communication and transaction database in a controlled facility through a communications firewall;

receiving, from the communication and transaction database, a personal history data and a transaction history data associated with the one or more individuals for a pre-selected period of time;

forming an aggregated data with the personal history data received from the communication and transaction database, the aggregated data comprising statistical data from one of the communication history data and the transaction history data;

applying a predetermined metric to the aggregated data, the predetermined metric comprising a weighted sum of the aggregated data;

determining a threat level category for the one or more individuals based on the predetermined metric, wherein the threat level category is indicative of a level of likelihood that the one or more individuals will display violent behavior; and

displaying the determined threat level category to an authorized user upon a request.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the personal history data comprises one of a communication history data and a transaction history data.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the personal history data corresponds to at least one of a telephone call, a voicemail, an onsite phone visit, an onsite video visit, a photo message, a video message, and a text message.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the personal history data comprises a deposit for the one or more individuals, or a spending for communication or entertainment by the one or more individuals.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are part of a communications server coupled with a communications terminal, the communications terminal configured for receiving at least one personal history data associated with the one or more individuals, and wherein the communications terminal comprises one of a telephone, a videophone, a camera, or a deposit kiosk.

17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the instructions in the non-transitory machine-readable medium cause the processors to perform operations further comprising requesting permission from the one or more individuals to store the personal history data in a memory.

18. The system of claim 12 , wherein the instructions in the non-transitory machine-readable medium cause the processors to perform the operations at regular time intervals pre-selected for each of the one or more individuals.

19. A non-transitory, machine-readable medium comprising instructions stored therein, which when executed by a system, cause the system to perform operations comprising:

requesting authorization to access a communication and transaction database in a controlled facility through a communications firewall;

receiving, from the communication and transaction database, a personal history data and a transaction history data associated with the one or more individuals for a pre-selected period of time;

forming an aggregated data with the personal history data received from the communication and transaction database, the aggregated data comprising statistical data from one of the communication history data and the transaction history data;

applying a predetermined metric to the aggregated data, the predetermined metric comprising a weighted sum of the aggregated data;

determining a threat level category for the one or more individuals based on the predetermined metric, wherein the threat level category is indicative of a level of likelihood that the one or more individuals will display violent behavior; and

displaying the determined threat level category to an authorized user upon a request.

20. The non-transitory, machine-readable medium of claim 19 , wherein the personal history data comprises one of a telephone call, a voicemail, an onsite phone visit, an onsite video visit, a photo message, a video message, or a text message.

Assignments (10)
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 7, 2024
From: GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION; DSI-ITI, INC.; VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; TOUCHPAY HOLDINGS, LLC; RENOVO SOFTWARE, INC.; INTELMATE LLC; 3V TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
To: TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068510/0764 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 6, 2024
From: UBS AG CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH)
To: GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION; DSI-ITI, INC.; VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; TOUCHPAY HOLDINGS, LLC; RENOVO SOFTWARE, INC.; INTELMATE LLC
Reel/Frame 069177/0067 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 6, 2024
From: UBS AG CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH)
To: GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION; DSI-ITI, INC.; VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; TOUCHPAY HOLDINGS, LLC; RENOVO SOFTWARE, INC.; INTELMATE LLC
Reel/Frame 069175/0165 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 5, 2018
From: GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION; DSI-ITI, INC.; VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; TOUCHPAY HOLDINGS, LLC; RENOVO SOFTWARE, INC.; INTELMATE LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 047720/0576 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 5, 2018
From: GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION; DSI-ITI, INC.; VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; TOUCHPAY HOLDINGS, LLC; RENOVO SOFTWARE, INC.; INTELMATE LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 048788/0014 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2017
From: INTELMATE LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 043382/0128 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2017
From: INTELMATE LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 043382/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2017
From: TELMATE, LLC
To: INTELMATE LLC
Reel/Frame 042155/0431 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2017
From: TORGERSRUD, RICHARD; DITTO, CHRISTOPHER
To: TELMATE, LLC
Reel/Frame 042346/0425 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2015
From: TELMATE, LLC
To: INTELMATE LLC
Reel/Frame 036850/0085 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13831431 · Mar 14, 2013
Related Publication 20150363695A1 · Dec 17, 2015