IP Library Granted Patent US 10,346,845
Granted Patent B2
US 10,346,845 · App. 14/845,613 · Granted Jul 9, 2019

Enhanced automated acceptance of payment transactions that have been flagged for human review by an anti-fraud system

Inventors: Kieran Sherlock (Palo Alto, CA); Jose Caldera (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: IDM GLOBAL, INC.
G06Q20/4016G06Q20/3825G06Q20/40G06Q20/4014
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,346,845
App. No.
14/845,613
Granted
Jul 9, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

An authentication system for electronic transactions occurring over a computerized network is provided that includes: (a) a transaction authentication system interface operatively coupled to the computerized network for receiving proposed transactions information over the computerized network; and (b) a transaction authentication tool, operatively coupled to the transaction authentication system interface, where the tool includes: an automated anti-fraud analysis component for analyzing transactions information from a plurality of proposed transactions and automatically rejecting a first subset of proposed transactions according to automatic rejection criteria and automatically assigning a second subset of transactions for additional review; and an automated acceptance component for analyzing the second subset of transactions and accepting a third subset of transactions from the second subset based upon automatic accepting criteria.

Claims (34)

1. An authentication system for electronic transactions occurring over a computerized network, the system comprising:

a server computing device having:

a transaction authentication system interface operatively coupled to the computerized network and configured to receive information of proposed transactions over the computerized network; and

a transaction authentication tool, operatively coupled to the transaction authentication system interface, the transaction authentication tool including:

an automated anti-fraud analysis component configured to cause the server computing device to:

analyze the information of the proposed transactions to evaluate fraud risks of the proposed transactions;

classify, based on the fraud risks and predetermined risk thresholds, the proposed transactions into:

 low risk transactions;

 high risk transactions; and

 medium risk transactions;

accept, by the server computing device, the low risk transactions;

reject, by the server computing device, the high risk transactions; and

an automated acceptance component configured to cause the server computing device to, after the medium risk transactions are being identified to have medium risk according to the predetermined risk thresholds:

obtain additional information of the medium risk transactions not used in evaluation of the fraud risks, wherein the additional information includes electronic signatures of user computers that submitted the medium risk transactions, wherein each electronic signature includes a typing pattern during entering data in one or more data fields on the user computer;

hash the additional information of the medium risk transactions, including hashing the electronic signatures;

analyze the hashed additional information of the medium risk transactions to determine reputation scores of the medium risk transactions, wherein the reputation scores are based at least in part on matching the hashed electronic signatures of user computers with hashed known electronic signatures;

identify, based on the reputation scores and automatic accepting criteria, a subset of the medium risk transactions;

accept, by the server computing device, the subset of the medium risk transactions; and

provide, by the server computing device, a portion of the medium risk transactions other than transactions in the subset for manual review;

wherein the high risk transactions are rejected without going through processing by the automated acceptance component.

2. The computerized payment anti-fraud system of claim 1 , wherein the automated acceptance component is configured to cause the server computing device to:

generate, based at least in part on the additional information not used in the evaluation of the fraud risks, a reputation score for each of the medium risk transactions, wherein for each of the medium risk transactions, the reputation score is based upon a combination of:

transaction information,

device information,

user account information,

payment instrument information, and

shipping address information; and

wherein the subset of transactions is identified for having reputation scores exceeding a first predetermined threshold for reputation score.

3. The computerized payment anti-fraud system of claim 2 , wherein the predetermined threshold for reputation score corresponds to a medium risk transaction having at least one of recognized and trusted device information, user account information, payment instrument information and shipping address information.

4. The computerized payment anti-fraud system of claim 2 , wherein the automated acceptance component is further configured to cause the server computing device to:

identifying a subset of the medium risk transactions having reputation scores below a second predetermined threshold for reputation score; and

reject, by the server computing device, the subset of the medium risk transactions having reputation scores below the second predetermined threshold for reputation score.

5. The computerized payment anti-fraud system of claim 4 , wherein the automated acceptance component is further configured to cause the server computing device to:

identify the portion of the medium risk transactions for manual review based on reputation scores of transactions in the portion being between the first predetermined score for reputation score and the second predetermined threshold for reputation score.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2021
From: CRESTLINE DIRECT FINANCE, L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: IDENTITYMIND GLOBAL INC.
Reel/Frame 058234/0781 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 15, 2021
From: IDENTITYMIND GLOBAL, INC.
To: ACUANT, INC.
Reel/Frame 054939/0553 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 14, 2020
From: IDENTIFYMIND GLOBAL INC.
To: ACUANT INC.
Reel/Frame 054052/0499 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2019
From: IDENTITYMIND GLOBAL INC.
To: CRESTLINE DIRECT FINANCE, L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 050409/0826 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2019
From: IDM GLOBAL, INC.
To: IDENTITYMIND GLOBAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 050185/0369 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 2, 2015
From: SHERLOCK, KIERAN; CALDERA, JOSE
To: IDM GLOBAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 036710/0767 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part 12776784 · May 10, 2010
Provisional Application 62045748 · Sep 4, 2014
Provisional Application 61178753 · May 15, 2009
Related Publication 20160063500A1 · Mar 3, 2016