Granted Patent B1

US 9,692,465 · App. 14/850,461 · Granted Jun 27, 2017

Abstract

Claims (78)

1. A computationally efficient computer implemented hybrid method of determining a modeled aggregate interference power distribution at a receiver resulting from multiple radio frequency (RF) interferers spaced from the receiver, comprising:

determining a respective interference power distribution at the receiver for each interferer;

determining, among the interference power distributions, (i) first interference power distributions that meet a Central Limit Theorem (CLT) criterion, and (ii) second interference power distributions that do not meet the CLT criterion;

combining the first interference power distributions using the CLT to produce a normal combined interference power distribution; and

convolving the second interference power distributions with each other and the normal combined interference power distribution to produce the aggregate interference power distribution.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a variance of each interference power distribution,

wherein the determining the first interference power distributions includes determining the first interference power distributions such that no one of the first interference power distributions has a variance that is greater than or equal to a predetermined fraction of a sum of the variances of the first interference power distributions.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the predetermined fraction is substantially less than 1.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a mean and a variance of each of the multiple interference power distributions,

wherein the combining the first interference power distributions includes summing the means of the first interference power distributions into a combined mean and summing the variances of the first interference power distributions into a combined variance such that the combined mean and the combined variance together define the normal combined interference power distribution according to the CLT.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

generating samples of the normal combined interference power distribution based on the combined mean and the combined variance thereof,

wherein the convolving the second interference power distributions with each other and the normal combined interference power distribution includes numerically convolving the second interference power distributions with each other and the samples of the normal combined interference power distribution.

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

summing the variances of the multiple interference power distributions to produce a total variance;

if a greatest variance among the variances is greater than or equal to a predetermined fraction of the total variance, subtracting the greatest variance from the total variance to produce a reduced total variance that represents a summation of variances remaining after the subtracting; and

repeating the subtracting using the reduced total variance in place of the total variance until a next greatest variance among the variances remaining is no longer greater than or equal to the predetermined fraction of the reduced total variance, wherein the variances remaining after the repeating correspond to the variances of the first interference power distributions and the variances subtracted after the repeating correspond to the variances of the second interference power distributions, respectively.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

summing the means to produce a total mean, wherein:

the subtracting includes subtracting the mean corresponding to the greatest variance from the total mean to produce a reduced total mean that represents a summation of means remaining after the subtracting; and

the repeating includes repeating the subtracting of the mean corresponding to the next greatest variance, wherein the means remaining after the repeating correspond to the means of the first interference power distributions and the means subtracted after the repeating correspond to the means of the second interference power distributions, respectively.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the interference power distribution at the receiver for each interferer includes, for each interferer:

assigning an effective isotropically radiated power (EIRP) to the interferer; and

scaling the EIRP by one or more factors to produce the interference power distribution at the receiver, wherein the one or more factors include: a signal propagation path loss between the interferer and the receiver; an antenna gain of the receiver in a direction of the interferer; frequency dependent rejection at the receiver based on a center frequency emitted by the interferer; and an antenna polarization mismatch between an antenna at the interferer and an antenna the receiver.

9. A non-transitory computer readable storage media encoded with instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a set of computationally efficient computer implemented hybrid operations to determine a modeled aggregate interference power distribution at a receiver resulting from multiple radio frequency (RF) interferers spaced from the receiver, wherein the instructions cause the processor to:

determine a respective interference power distribution at the receiver for each interferer;

determine, among the interference power distributions, (i) first interference power distributions that meet a Central Limit Theorem (CLT) criterion, and (ii) second interference power distributions that do not meet the CLT criterion;

combine the first interference power distributions using the CLT to produce a normal combined interference power distribution; and

convolve the second interference power distributions with each other and the normal combined interference power distribution to produce the aggregate interference power distribution.

10. The computer readable storage media of claim 9 , further including instructions to cause the processor to:

determine a variance of each interference power distribution,

wherein the instruction to cause the processor to determine the first interference power distributions include instructions to cause the processor to determine the first interference power distributions such that no one of the first interference power distributions has a variance that is greater than or equal to a predetermined fraction of a sum of the variances of the first interference power distributions.

11. The computer readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein the predetermined fraction is substantially less than 1.

12. The computer readable storage media of claim 9 , further including instructions to cause the processor to:

determine a mean and a variance of each of the multiple interference power distributions,

wherein the instructions to cause the processor to combine the first interference power distributions includes instructions to cause the processor to sum the means of the first interference power distributions into a combined mean and summing the variances of the first interference power distributions into a combined variance such that the combined mean and the combined variance together define the normal combined interference power distribution according to the CLT.

13. The computer readable storage media of claim 12 , further including instructions to cause the processor to:

generate samples of the normal combined interference power distribution based on the combined mean and the combined variance thereof,

wherein the instructions to cause the processor to convolve the second interference power distributions with each other and the normal combined interference power distribution include instructions to cause the processor to numerically convolve the second interference power distributions with each other and the samples of the normal combined interference power distribution.

14. The computer readable storage media of claim 12 , further including instructions to cause the processor to:

sum the variances of the multiple interference power distributions to produce a total variance;

if a greatest variance among the variances is greater than or equal to a predetermined fraction of the total variance, subtract the greatest variance from the total variance to produce a reduced total variance that represents a summation of variances remaining after the subtract operation; and

repeating the subtract operation using the reduced total variance in place of the total variance until a next greatest variance among the variances remaining is no longer greater than or equal to the predetermined fraction of the reduced total variance, wherein the variances remaining after the repeating correspond to the variances of the first interference power distributions and the variances subtracted after the repeating correspond to the variances of the second interference power distributions, respectively.

15. The computer readable storage media of claim 14 , further including instructions to cause the processor to:

sum the means to produce a total mean, wherein:

the instructions to cause the processor to subtract include instructions to cause the processor to subtract the mean corresponding to the greatest variance from the total mean to produce a reduced total mean that represents a summation of means remaining after the subtracting; and

the instructions to cause the processor to repeat include instructions to cause the processor to repeat the subtract of the mean corresponding to the next greatest variance, wherein the means remaining after the repeating correspond to the means of the first interference power distributions and the means subtracted after the repeating correspond to the means of the second interference power distributions, respectively.

16. An apparatus comprising:

an antenna;

a radio frequency (RF) receiver coupled to the antenna; and

a controller, coupled to the RF receiver, configured to implement a computer model to determine a modeled aggregate interference power distribution resulting from multiple interferers, wherein to implement the computer model the controller is configured to:

determine a respective interference power distribution for each interferer;

determine, among the interference power distributions, (i) first interference power distributions that meet a Central Limit Theorem (CLT) criterion, and (ii) second interference power distributions that do not meet the CLT criterion;

combine the first interference power distributions using the CLT to produce a normal combined interference power distribution; and

convolve the second interference power distributions with each other and the normal combined interference power distribution to produce the modeled aggregate interference power distribution.

17. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the controller is further configured to:

receive signals indicative of actual RF signals captured by the antenna;

determine an actual aggregate signal power distribution of the actual RF signals;

compare the actual aggregate signal power distribution to the modeled aggregated interference power distribution; and

adjust signal processing parameters in the RF receiver responsive to results of the compare.

18. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein to implement the computer model the controller is further configured to:

determine a variance of each interference power distribution,

wherein the controller is configured to determine the first interference power distributions such that no one of the first interference power distributions has a variance that is greater than or equal to a predetermined fraction of a sum of the variances of the first interference power distributions.

19. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein to implement the computer model the controller is configured to:

determine a mean and a variance of each of the multiple interference power distributions,

wherein the controller is configured to combine the first interference power distributions by summing the means of the first interference power distributions into a combined mean and summing the variances of the first interference power distributions into a combined variance such that the combined mean and the combined variance together define the normal combined interference power distribution according to the CLT.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein to implement the computer model the controller is configured to:

generate samples of the normal combined interference power distribution based on the combined mean and the combined variance thereof,

wherein the controller is configured to convolve by numerically convolving the second interference power distributions with each other and the samples of the normal combined interference power distribution.

21. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein to implement the computer model the controller is configured to:

sum the variances of the multiple interference power distributions to produce a total variance;

if a greatest variance among the variances is greater than or equal to a predetermined fraction of the total variance, subtract the greatest variance from the total variance to produce a reduced total variance that represents a summation of variances remaining after the subtracting; and

repeat the subtract operation using the reduced total variance in place of the total variance until a next greatest variance among the variances remaining is no longer greater than or equal to the predetermined fraction of the reduced total variance, wherein the variances remaining after the repeating correspond to the variances of the first interference power distributions and the variances subtracted after the repeating correspond to the variances of the second interference power distributions, respectively.

22. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the controller is configured to determine the interference power distribution at the receiver for each interferer by, for each interferer:

assigning an effective isotropically radiated power (EIRP) to the interferer; and

scaling the EIRP by one or more factors to produce the interference power distribution at the receiver, wherein the one or more factors include: a signal propagation path loss between the interferer and the receiver; an antenna gain of the receiver in a direction of the interferer; frequency dependent rejection at the receiver based on a center frequency emitted by the interferer; and an antenna polarization mismatch between an antenna at the interferer and an antenna the receiver.

Assignments (12)