IP Library Granted Patent US 10,261,663
Granted Patent B2
US 10,261,663 · App. 14/868,655 · Granted Apr 16, 2019

Mandatory comment on action or modification

Inventors: Dean Anthony Ritz (Vashon, WA); Willie Eide (Bozeman, MT); Ephie Risho (Bozeman, MT)
Assignee: Workiva Inc.
G06F3/0482G06F3/04842G06F17/241G06F17/246G06Q10/101
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,261,663
App. No.
14/868,655
Granted
Apr 16, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method requires a mandatory comment in a software productivity tool, comprising: opening in the software productivity tool a document stored in a non-volatile hardware data storage device; receiving a definition of an actionable data item of the document; receiving a request for an action associated with the item; determining if the action triggers a predefined comment rule; if triggered, then: requiring a mandatory comment; storing the accepted entered comment in the non-volatile hardware data storage device; and performing the requested action. A method specifies a mandatory comment, comprising: receiving a definition of an actionable data item of the document; receiving a definition of a comment rule related to an action on the item; receiving a definition of a comment criteria associated with the comment rule; and storing the actionable data item, the triggering criteria, and the comment criteria in a non-volatile storage device of a hardware device.

Claims (31)

1. A method for specifying a mandatory comment, comprising:

receiving a definition of an actionable data item within a document;

receiving a definition of a comment rule related to an action by a user on the actionable data item within the document,

wherein the comment rule specifies conditions under which a mandatory comment is demanded of the user when the user adds, changes, or deletes information associated with the actionable data item within the document;

receiving a definition of a comment criteria associated with the comment rule; and

storing the actionable data item within the document, the comment rule, and the comment criteria in a non-volatile storage device of a hardware device.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving a specification of a consequent action to perform that is related to the comment.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the consequent action is notifying at least one of an owner(s) of the document or other user(s) interested in the document.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comment rule comprises adequacy criteria.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the adequacy criteria is an attribute of an entered comment.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the adequacy criteria is based on content of an entered comment.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the adequacy criteria is context dependent.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a second selection of a data item of the document;

receiving a second definition of a comment rule related to an action on the data item; and

receiving a second definition of a comment rule associated with a triggering criteria.

9. A system for specifying a mandatory comment, wherein the system is configured to carry out actions comprising:

receiving a definition of an actionable data item within a document;

receiving a definition of a comment rule related to an action by a user on the actionable data item within the document,

wherein the comment rule specifies conditions under which a mandatory comment is demanded of the user when the user adds, changes, or deletes information associated with the actionable data item within the document;

receiving a definition of a comment criteria associated with the comment rule; and

storing the actionable data item within the document, the comment rule, and the comment criteria in a non-volatile storage device of a hardware device.

10. The system of claim 9 , configured to carry out further actions comprising receiving a specification of a consequent action to perform that is related to the comment.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the consequent action is notifying at least one of an owner(s) of the document or other user(s) interested in the document.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the comment rule comprises adequacy criteria.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the adequacy criteria is an attribute of an entered comment.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the adequacy criteria is based on content of an entered comment.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the adequacy criteria is context dependent.

16. The system of claim 9 , further comprising:

receiving a second selection of a data item of the document;

receiving a second definition of a comment rule related to an action on the data item; and receiving a second definition of a comment rule associated with the comment criteria.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 15, 2019
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: WORKIVA INC.; WORKIVA INTERNATIONAL LLC
Reel/Frame 050063/0536 →
FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 5, 2016
From: WORKIVA INC.; WORKIVA INTERNATIONAL LLC
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 038361/0070 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 29, 2015
From: RITZ, DEAN ANTHONY; EIDE, WILLIE; RISHO, EPHIE
To: WORKIVA INC.
Reel/Frame 036678/0841 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62219896 · Sep 17, 2015
Related Publication 20170083500A1 · Mar 23, 2017