IP Library Granted Patent US 9,584,672
Granted Patent B2
US 9,584,672 · App. 14/886,572 · Granted Feb 28, 2017

Cost allocation for derived data usage

Inventors: Jaan Leemet (Austin, TX); Paul Schmidt (Rocky Hill, CT); Albert R. Subbloie, Jr. (Orange, CT); Christopher J. DeBenedictis (Branford, CT)
Assignee: Tangoe, Inc.
H04M15/8214H04L12/1475H04M15/07H04M15/41H04M15/43H04M15/44H04M15/705H04M15/783H04M15/80H04W4/005
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,584,672
App. No.
14/886,572
Granted
Feb 28, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method that allows for information relating to data and communication resource usage to be gathered and analyzed such that particular data transactions and usage can be classified based on purpose and/or type. Further, the system and method provide reporting based on amount of usage and/or purpose or type of usage so that associated costs and usage can be calculated applied and allocated to particular accounts, divisions, groups or individuals within and outside of a company or entity. Further, the system may restrict data usage of devices to data usage that can be allocated to particular accounts based on purpose, source, destination or other.

Claims (49)

1. A system for allocating communication costs comprising:

a computer;

a storage containing data relating to a first and a second data transaction each having a value indicative of a device's data usage of a communication resource associated with an application wherein the first data transaction indicates a personal data usage and the second data transaction indicates a business data usage;

software executing on said computer comparing a cost record indicative of a cost associated with the communication resource to the first and second data transactions to determine a first portion and a second portion of the cost attributed to the device based on the value associated respectively with the first and second data transactions; and

said software allocating the first and second portions of the cost to different accounts thereby causing usage via the application to be allocated to different accounts.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the different accounts are each associated with one or more of the group consisting of: credit card information, bank account information, and online payment information.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein the different accounts are indicated by one or more of: a division, a group, an individual within a company or entity, and an individual outside the company or entity.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein said storage contains a plurality of data transactions, said software further comparing each of the plurality of data transaction to the cost record to determine an allocated cost attributed to each data transaction.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein the plurality of data transactions are associated with an entity, the system further comprising:

software executing on said computer associating the allocated cost with a group within the entity in order to charge the allocated cost to the group, wherein the group is associated with a plurality of devices.

6. The system of claim 5 further comprising:

said software querying a cost table based on a type of communication resource to retrieve the cost record from said second database, wherein the cost table includes data pertaining to at least one service agreement relating to the communication resource.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein each data transaction is selected from the group consisting of: Internet, cellular data, SMS and combinations thereof.

8. The system of claim 1 wherein the cost record is indicative of the cost of the communication resource for a plurality of devices.

9. The system of claim 1 wherein the data transaction includes a source address or a destination address the system further comprising:

said software querying the storage by at least one of the source address and/or destination address to determine if an address stored in the first storage matches at least one of the source address and/or destination address.

10. The system of claim 9 wherein at least one of the source address and/or destination address is indicative of an e-mail address.

11. The system of claim 1 wherein the first and second data transactions are further associated with a first user.

12. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the plurality of data transactions is indicative of data use for business purposes and the cost report is generated to associate a business account identifier with the data use for business purposes.

13. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the plurality of data transactions is indicative of login credentials for a cloud computing resource.

14. The system of claim 1 wherein the device is selected from the group consisting of: a smart phone, a tablet, a lap top computer, a desk top computer, a server, a device that utilizes machine-to-machine (M2M) communication and combinations thereof.

15. A computer implemented method for allocating communication costs, the computer performing the steps of:

accessing data corresponding to a plurality of data transactions associated with at least one device, each data transaction having a value indicative of the device's data usage of a communication resource associated with an application;

accessing a cost record indicative of a cost associated with the communication resource;

comparing the value of a first one and a second one of the plurality of data transactions to the cost record to determine a first and a second allocated cost respectively for the first one and the second one of the plurality of data transactions wherein the first data transaction indicates a personal data usage and the second data transaction indicates a business data usage;

allocating the first and second allocated costs to different accounts thereby causing usage via the application to be allocated to the different accounts.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein said comparing step includes comparing the value of each of the plurality of data transactions to the cost record to determine an allocated cost for each of the plurality of data transactions.

17. The method of claim 15 further comprising further comprising associating at least one of the first and second allocated costs with an account associated with a third party other than the enterprise.

18. The method of claim 15 further comprising:

determining an allocated cost associated with each of the at least one device; and

associating an account identifier with each allocated cost.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising generating a cost report based on the comparing step, the cost report indicative of the cost allocated based on the value.

20. The method of claim 15 further comprising:

wherein at least one data transaction is associated with data usage of a cloud computing resource.

21. The method of claim 15 further comprising:

associating the first or the second allocated cost with a group within an entity in order to charge the first or second allocated cost to the group, wherein the group is associated with a plurality of devices.

22. The system of claim 15 wherein the different accounts are each associated with one or more of the group consisting of: credit card information, bank account information, and online payment information.

23. The system of claim 15 wherein the different accounts are indicated by one or more of: a division, a group, an individual within a company or entity, and an individual outside the company or entity.

24. A system for allocating communication costs comprising:

a computer;

a storage accessible by said computer and containing a record of a first and a second data transaction each having a value indicative of a data usage of a communication resource by a device, where the data usage is associated with an application;

software executing on said computer for generating a cost report by comparing cost data indicative of a cost associated with the communication resource to the first and second data transactions to allocate a first cost to a first account and a second cost to a second account, the first and second costs respectively associated with the first and second data transactions thereby causing usage via the application to be allocated to different accounts;

wherein the first data transaction indicates a personal data usage and the second data transaction indicates a business data usage.

25. The system of claim 24 wherein the cost report is indicative of a group associated with the data transaction.

26. The system of claim 24 wherein at least one of the plurality of data transactions is indicative of login credentials for a cloud computing resource, wherein the first or second allocated cost is associated with data usage associated with the cloud computing resource.

27. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

said software querying a cost table based on a type of communication resource to retrieve the cost record from said second database, wherein the cost table includes information pertaining to at least one service agreement relating to the communication resource between the entity and a communication resource provider.

28. The system of claim 24 wherein the different accounts are each associated with one or more of the group consisting of: credit card information, bank account information, and online payment information.

29. The system of claim 24 wherein the different accounts are indicated by one or more of: a division, a group, an individual within a company or entity, and an individual outside the company or entity.

Assignments (5)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2018
From: TANGOE, LLC; TANGOE US, INC.; MOBI WIRELESS MANAGEMENT, LLC
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047697/0104 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL 042734 FRAME 0555 Recorded Nov 30, 2018
From: OBSIDIAN AGENCY SERVICES, INC.
To: TANGOE, LLC; TANGOE US, INC.
Reel/Frame 047691/0457 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 16, 2018
From: TANGOE, INC.
To: TANGOE US, INC.
Reel/Frame 047590/0729 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 16, 2017
From: ASENTINEL, LLC; TANGOE, INC.
To: OBSIDIAN AGENCY SERVICES, INC., C/O TENNENBAUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
Reel/Frame 042734/0555 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2015
From: LEEMET, JAAN; SCHMIDT, PAUL; SUBBLOIE, ALBERT R., JR.; DEBENEDICTIS, CHRISTOPHER J.
To: TANGOE, INC.
Reel/Frame 036954/0489 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 14263756 · Apr 28, 2014
Related Publication 20160044182A1 · Feb 11, 2016