IP Library Granted Patent US 9,857,960
Granted Patent B1
US 9,857,960 · App. 14/887,071 · Granted Jan 2, 2018

Data collaboration between different entities

Inventors: Graham Dennis (Downer, AU); Timothy Taylor (Wellington, NZ); Kimberley Lear (Washington, DC); Jesse Rickard (Kingstone, AU); Dyon Balding (New York, NY); Hunter Pitelka (Arlington, VA); David Leblanc (Ottawa, CA); Vaughan Shanks (Dickson, AU); Joel Davies (Canberra, AU); Steffen Merten (Lower Hutt, NZ); Christopher Cook (Wellington, NZ); Christopher Male (Wellington, NZ); Marc Barker (New Acton, AU)
Assignee: Palantir Technologies, Inc.
G06F3/04847G06T11/206G06T11/60H04L67/06H04L67/10G06T2200/24
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,857,960
App. No.
14/887,071
Granted
Jan 2, 2018
Kind
B1
Abstract

Techniques related to data collaboration between different entities are disclosed. In an embodiment, a graph may be displayed in a computer graphical user interface. The graph may include nodes and edges. Each node may represent a distinct data object. Each edge may represent one or more relationships between the two distinct data objects. Based on one or more redaction criteria, a portion of the graph may be identified to be redacted before the graph is exported. Display of the graph in the computer graphical user interface may be updated to remove display of the portion of the graph. After the updating, a request to export the graph may be received. Responsive to receiving the request, a machine-readable representation of a redacted graph may be exported.

Claims (45)

1. A method comprising:

displaying, in a computer graphical user interface, a graph comprising nodes and edges, each of the edges connecting two of the nodes, each of the nodes representing a distinct data object, each edge representing one or more relationships between two distinct data objects;

for each redaction stage of a plurality of redaction stages, performing operations comprising:

receiving, as a first user input, a selection of a stage-specific redaction category from a set of available redaction categories;

wherein the set of available redaction categories is automatically generated based on metadata of the nodes and edges in the graph;

automatically generating and displaying a set of stage-specific redaction sub-categories that are sub-categories of the selected stage-specific redaction category, wherein the set of stage-specific redaction sub-categories are automatically generated based on the metadata of the nodes and edges in the graph and the selected stage-specific redaction category;

receiving, as a second user input, a selection of one or more stage-specific redaction sub-categories from the set of stage-specific redaction categories;

based on the selection of the stage-specific redaction category and the selection of the one or more stage-specific redaction sub-categories, identifying a portion of the graph to be redacted before the graph is exported;

updating display of the graph in the computer graphical user interface to remove display of the portion of the graph;

wherein the plurality of redaction stages includes:

a redaction stage that filters data based on an access control redactions category;

a different redaction stage that filters data based on a different redaction category;

after performing the operations for the plurality of redaction stages, receiving a request to export the graph; and

responsive to receiving the request, exporting a machine-readable representation of a redacted graph;

wherein the method is performed by one or more computing devices.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the different redaction stage filters data corresponding to one or more provenance identifiers.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the different redaction stage filters data corresponding to one or more data object types.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the different redaction stage filters data corresponding to one or more data object property types.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the different redaction stage filters data corresponding to one or more media types.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine-readable representation is exported with an ontology map of the redacted graph.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine-readable representation comprises a respective unique identifier for each distinct data object in the redacted graph.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the exporting a machine-readable representation of the redacted graph that comprises the graph exclusive of the portion of the graph includes generating and providing audit data to a person authorized to approve the exporting of the machine-readable representation.

9. A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

one or more computer-readable media storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause:

displaying, in a computer graphical user interface, a graph comprising nodes and edges, each of the edges connecting two of the nodes, each of the nodes representing a distinct data object, each edge representing one or more relationships between two distinct data objects;

for each redaction stage of a plurality of redaction stages, performing operations comprising:

receiving, as a first user input, a selection of a stage-specific redaction category from a set of available redaction categories;

wherein the set of available redaction categories is automatically generated based on metadata of the nodes and edges in the graph;

automatically generating and displaying a set of stage-specific redaction sub-categories that are sub-categories of the selected stage-specific redaction category, wherein the set of stage-specific redaction sub-categories are automatically generated based on the metadata of the nodes and edges in the graph and the selected stage-specific redaction category;

receiving, as a second user input, a selection of one or more stage-specific redaction sub-categories from the set of stage-specific redaction categories;

based on the selection of the stage-specific redaction category and the selection of the one or more stage-specific redaction sub-categories, identifying a portion of the graph to be redacted before the graph is exported;

updating display of the graph in the computer graphical user interface to remove display of the portion of the graph;

wherein the plurality of redaction stages includes:

a redaction stage that filters data based on an access control redactions category;

a different redaction stage that filters data based on a different redaction category;

after performing the operations for the plurality of redaction stages, receiving a request to export the graph; and

responsive to receiving the request, exporting a machine-readable representation of a redacted graph.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the different redaction stage filters data corresponding to one or more provenance identifiers.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the different redaction stage filters data corresponding to one or more data object types.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the different redaction stage filters data corresponding to one or more data object property types.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the different redaction stage filters data corresponding to one or more media types.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the machine-readable representation is exported with an ontology map of the redacted graph.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the machine-readable representation comprises a respective unique identifier for each distinct data object in the redacted graph.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the exporting a machine-readable representation of the redacted graph that comprises the graph exclusive of the portion of the graph includes generating and providing audit data to a person authorized to approve the exporting of the machine-readable representation.

Assignments (8)
ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENTS Recorded Jul 3, 2022
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 060572/0640 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 3, 2022
From: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 060572/0506 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ERRONEOUSLY LISTED PATENT BY REMOVING APPLICATION NO. 16/832267 FROM THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 052856 FRAME 0382. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Aug 26, 2021
From: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
To: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 057335/0753 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2020
From: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 052856/0817 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2020
From: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
To: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 052856/0382 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2020
From: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 051713/0149 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2020
From: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 051709/0471 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 4, 2016
From: DENNIS, GRAHAM; TAYLOR, TIMOTHY; LEAR, KIMBERLEY; RICKARD, JESSE; BALDING, DYON; PITELKA, HUNTER; LEBLANC, DAVID; SHANKS, VAUGHAN; DAVIES, JOEL; MERTEN, STEFFEN; COOK, CHRISTOPHER; MALE, CHRISTOPHER; BARKER, MARC
To: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 037701/0021 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 62209762 · Aug 25, 2015