IP Library Granted Patent US 10,137,645
Granted Patent B2
US 10,137,645 · App. 14/895,759 · Granted Nov 27, 2018

Process and machine for manufacturing an ophthalmic lens

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,137,645
App. No.
14/895,759
Granted
Nov 27, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A process for manufacturing an ophthalmic lens ( 10 ) having at least one optical function, includes: a step ( 100 ) of additively manufacturing the ophthalmic lens ( 10 ) by depositing a plurality of preset volume elements of at least one material having a preset refractive index in order to form a target geometric envelope; a step of determining an actual geometric envelope at least once during the implementation of the additive manufacturing step ( 100 ); and a step of triggering a corrective action if there is in a zone a discrepancy larger than a preset threshold between the target geometric envelope and the actual geometric envelope.

Claims (19)

1. A process for manufacturing an ophthalmic lens ( 10 ) having at least one optical function, which comprises:

a step ( 100 ) of additively manufacturing said ophthalmic lens ( 10 ), by depositing a plurality of predetermined volume elements of at least one material having a predetermined refractive index, in accordance with a target geometric envelope ( 18 );

a step of determining an actual geometric envelope at least once during the implementation of said additive manufacturing step ( 100 ); and

a step of triggering a corrective action if there is in a zone (P) a difference (Ecdif) larger than a predetermined threshold (S 1 , S 2 ) between said target geometric envelope ( 18 ) and said actual geometric envelope, wherein said step of triggering a corrective action includes:

i) implementing a first corrective action when there is, in said zone (P), between said target geometric envelope ( 18 ) and said actual geometric envelope, a difference (Ecdif) larger than a first predetermined threshold (S 1 ) and lower than a second predetermined threshold (S 2 ), and

ii) implementing a second corrective action different from the first corrective action when there is, in said zone (P), between said target geometric envelope ( 18 ) and said actual geometric envelope, a difference (Ecdif) larger than said second predetermined threshold (S 2 ), and

wherein said first corrective action includes depositing, on said zone (P), at least one additional predetermined volume element ( 14 ) without replacing the target geometric envelope ( 18 ), this deposition being said to be an altitude addition, whereas the second corrective action includes determining a modified target geometric envelope ( 19 ) replacing said target geometric envelope ( 18 ).

2. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said corrective action includes depositing on said zone (P) at least one additional predetermined volume element ( 14 ) and/or determining a modified target geometric envelope ( 19 ) replacing said target geometric envelope ( 18 ).

3. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second corrective action furthermore includes depositing, on said zone (P), at least one additional predetermined volume element ( 14 ), this deposition being said to be a curvature addition.

4. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

said step of determining an actual geometric envelope includes the step ( 200 ) of determining at least one geometric value representative of the average curvature (Cm) in said zone (P); and

to determine said difference (Ecdif) in said zone (P), said process includes the step ( 300 ) of comparing said at least one geometric value representative of the average curvature (Cm) to a geometric value representative of the target average curvature (Cmc) required in said zone (P) and determined from said target geometric envelope ( 18 ).

5. The process as claimed in claim 4 , wherein said step ( 200 ) of determining at least one geometric value representative of the average curvature (Cm) includes the step ( 202 ) of measuring at least one pair of radii of curvature (Rc 1 , Rc 2 ) associated with a given point in said zone (P).

6. The process as claimed in claim 5 , wherein said step ( 200 ) of determining at least one geometric value representative of the average curvature (Cm) furthermore includes the step ( 203 ) of determining the geometric value of the average curvature at said given point in said zone (P) and/or a value representative of the largest difference in average-curvature geometric values in said zone (P), from measured geometric values of said at least one pair of radii of curvature (Rc 1 , Rc 2 ).

7. The process as claimed in claim 5 , wherein said step ( 200 ) of determining at least one geometric value representative of the average curvature (Cm) furthermore includes the step ( 204 ) of determining actual geometric characteristics of said ophthalmic lens ( 10 ), defining said actual geometric envelope, from measured geometric values of said at least one pair of radii of curvature (Rc 1 , Rc 2 ) and/or from said average-curvature geometric value determined in said zone (P) and/or from said value representative of the largest difference in average-curvature geometric values in said zone (P).

8. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said zone (P) has a finalized target curvature profile.

9. An additive manufacturing machine configured to manufacture an ophthalmic lens ( 10 ) and comprising a command/control unit ( 2 ) provided with system elements ( 3 , 4 , 5 ) configured to run a computer program comprising instructions configured to implement each of the steps of the process as claimed in claim 1 .

10. The machine as claimed in claim 9 , further comprising a measuring device ( 30 ) configured to measure geometric values representative of the average curvature (Cm) at least at a given point in at least one zone (P) of said ophthalmic lens ( 10 ).

11. The process as claimed in claim 6 , wherein said step ( 200 ) of determining at least one geometric value representative of the average curvature (Cm) furthermore includes the step ( 204 ) of determining actual geometric characteristics of said ophthalmic lens ( 10 ), defining said actual geometric envelope, from measured geometric values of said at least one pair of radii of curvature (Rc 1 , Rc 2 ) and/or from said average-curvature geometric value determined in said zone (P) and/or from said value representative of the largest difference in average-curvature geometric values in said zone (P).

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 6, 2018
From: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL (COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE D'OPTIQUE)
To: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL
Reel/Frame 045853/0275 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2015
From: QUERE, LOIC; GOURRAUD, ALEXANDRE; ALLIONE, PASCAL; BEGON, CEDRIC
To: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL (COMPAGNIE GENERALE D'OPTIQUE)
Reel/Frame 037203/0179 →