IP Library Granted Patent US 10,997,119
Granted Patent B2
US 10,997,119 · App. 14/921,974 · Granted May 4, 2021

Reduced size extent identification

Inventor: Karan Gupta (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Nutanix, Inc.
G06F16/137G06F16/122G06F16/1748
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,997,119
App. No.
14/921,974
Filed
Oct 23, 2015
Granted
May 4, 2021
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2166
USPC
707/693
Abstract

An approach for reduced size extent identifiers for a file system may be implemented by generating a full-size extent or file identifier and generating a smaller identifier from a portion of the full-size identifier. A check may be performed as to whether the smaller identifier is unique within a file system and if it is unique, the smaller identifier may be used in place of the full-size identifier. If not unique, the size of the smaller identifier may be increased. In some embodiments, the size of the smaller identifier is increased until a unique identifier if found.

Claims (37)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

identifying a full-size identifier for an extent, the extent being stored in a file system;

generating a sub-size identifier from a sequential portion of the full-size identifier, the sub-size identifier being smaller than the full-size identifier, both the full-size identifier and the sub-size identifier uniquely identifying the extent within the file system, wherein the sub-size identifier has an initial size and a size of the sub-size identifier is increased from the initial size until the sub-size identifier is unique within the file system; and

storing the sub-size identifier to reference the extent in place of the full-size identifier.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether the sub-size identifier is unique in the file system and increasing the size if the sub-size identifier is not unique in the file system.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the full-size identifier is unique within the file system.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the sub-size identifier is generated from a leading sequential portion of the full-size identifier.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the sub-size identifier is stored as a primary identifier for the extent within the file system.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving a write request for the extent and deduplicating the extent in the file system using the sub-size identifier.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the extent is deduplicated in a process comprising comparing the full-size identifier to other full-size identifiers in the file system.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the size of the sub-size identifier is repeatedly increased.

9. A system comprising:

a file system;

a computer processor to execute a set of instructions;

a memory to hold the set of instructions, in which the set of instructions, when executed by the computer processor cause a set of acts comprising:

identifying a full-size identifier for an extent, the extent being stored in a file system;

generating a sub-size identifier from a sequential portion of the full-size identifier, the sub-size identifier being smaller than the full-size identifier, both the full-size identifier and the sub-size identifier uniquely identifying the extent within the file system, wherein the sub-size identifier has an initial size and a size of the sub-size identifier is increased from the initial size until the sub-size identifier is unique within the file system; and

storing the sub-size identifier to reference the extent in place of the full-size identifier.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the set of acts further comprise determining whether the sub-size identifier is unique in the file system and increasing the size if the sub-size identifier is not unique in the file system.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the full-size identifier is unique within the file system.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the sub-size identifier is generated from a leading sequential portion of the full-size identifier.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the set of acts further comprise storing the sub-size identifier as a primary identifier for the extent within the file system.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the set of acts further processing a write request for the extent and deduplicating the extent in the file system.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the set of acts further comprise deduplicating the extent in a process comprising comparing the full-size identifier to other full-size identifiers in the file system.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the size of the sub-size identifier is repeatedly increased.

17. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a sequence of instructions which, when executed by a processor causes a set of acts comprising:

identifying a full-size identifier for an extent, the extent being stored in a file system;

generating a sub-size identifier from a sequential portion of the full-size identifier, the sub-size identifier being smaller than the full-size identifier, both the full-size identifier and the sub-size identifier uniquely identifying the extent within the file system, wherein the sub-size identifier has an initial size and a size of the sub-size identifier is increased from the initial size until the sub-size identifier is unique within the file system; and

storing the sub-size identifier to reference the extent in place of the full-size identifier.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the set of acts further comprise determining whether the sub-size identifier is unique in the file system and increasing the size if the sub-size identifier is not unique in the file system.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the full-size identifier is unique within the file system.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the sub-size identifier is generated from a leading sequential portion of the full-size identifier.

21. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the set of acts further comprise storing the sub-size identifier as a primary identifier for the extent within the file system.

22. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the set of acts further comprise processing a write request for the extent and deduplicating the extent in the file system.

23. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the set of acts further comprise deduplicating the extent in a process comprising comparing the full-size identifier to other full-size identifiers in the file system.

24. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 22 , wherein the size of the sub-size identifier is repeatedly increased.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2025
From: NUTANIX, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070206/0463 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 28, 2016
From: GOLDMAN SACHS SPECIALTY LENDING GROUP, L.P., AS AGENT
To: NUTANIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 040168/0586 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2016
From: NUTANIX, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS SPECIALTY LENDING GROUP, L.P., AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 038440/0712 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2015
From: GUPTA, KARAN
To: NUTANIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 037089/0702 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200034449A1 · Jan 30, 2020