System, method, and computer program product for monitoring an execution flow of a function
View Patent ↗A system, method, and computer program product are provided for monitoring an execution flow of a function. In use, data associated with a function is identified within a call stack. Additionally, a call stack frame is determined from freed memory in the call stack. Further, an execution flow of the function is monitored, utilizing the call stack frame from the freed memory.
1. One or more non-transitory computer readable media comprising instructions for monitoring an execution flow of a function stored thereon that when executed cause a programmable device to:
identify data associated with a function within a call stack during execution of the function by the programmable device;
examine an area of memory outside the call stack during execution of the function;
determine a former call stack frame from the area of memory outside the call stack, wherein the former call stack frame includes memory that was previously popped off the call stack; and
determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised.
2. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 1 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprise instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to:
determine whether the former call stack frame has been overwritten by a second call stack entry subsequent to a first call stack entry in the former call stack frame.
3. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to:
monitor the former call stack frame if the former call stack frame has not been compromised.
4. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to:
not monitor the former call stack frame if the former call stack frame has been compromised.
5. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 1 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprise instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to:
examine code associated with the former call stack frame.
6. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 5 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to examine code associated with the former call stack frame comprise instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to:
examine code preceding a return address in the former call stack frame.
7. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 1 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprise instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to:
determine a level of confidence associated with the former call stack frame.
8. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 7 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to determine a level of confidence associated with the former call stack frame comprise instructions that when executed cause the programmable device to:
determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised based on the level of confidence.
9. A method for monitoring an execution flow of a function, comprising:
identifying data associated with a function within a call stack during execution of the function by a programmable device;
examining an area of memory outside the call stack during execution of the function;
determining a former call stack frame from the area of memory outside the call stack, wherein the former call stack frame includes memory that previously held an active call stack entry; and
determining whether the former call stack frame has been compromised.
10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:
monitoring the former call stack frame.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein monitoring the former call stack frame comprises:
monitoring the former call stack frame unless the former call stack frame has been compromised.
12. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprises:
examining code preceding a return address in the former call stack frame.
13. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprises:
determining whether the former call stack frame has been overwritten by a second call stack entry subsequent to a first call stack entry in the former call stack frame.
14. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprises:
determining whether the former call stack frame has been compromised based on a level of confidence associated with the former call stack frame.
15. A system, comprising:
a processor; and
a non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions for monitoring an execution flow of a function stored thereon that when executed configure the processor to:
identify data associated with a function within a call stack during execution of the function by the processor,
examine an area of memory outside the call stack during execution of the function;
determine a former call stack frame from the area of memory outside the call stack, wherein the former call stack frame includes memory that previously held an active stack entry, and
determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised.
16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the processor to determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprise instructions that when executed cause the processor to:
determine whether the former call stack frame has been overwritten by a second call stack entry subsequent to a first call stack entry in the former call stack frame.
17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions that when executed cause the processor to:
monitor the former call stack frame if the former call stack frame has not been compromised.
18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the processor to determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprise instructions that when executed cause the processor to:
examine code associated with the former call stack frame.
19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the processor to examine code associated with the former call stack frame comprise instructions that when executed cause the processor to:
examine code preceding a return address in the former call stack frame.
20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions that when executed cause the processor to determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised comprise instructions that when executed cause the processor to:
determine a level of confidence associated with the former call stack frame; and
determine whether the former call stack frame has been compromised based on the level of confidence.