Decision forest compilation
View Patent ↗Embodiments of the present disclosure include methods, devices, and computer program products for detecting malware in a file. Embodiments include identifying a plurality of features of the file, categorizing each of the plurality of features to define a plurality of categories of features, building a first decision tree based on a first category from the plurality of categories, the first category comprising a first set of features of the file, and building a second decision tree based on a second category from the plurality of categories, the second decision tree comprising a second set of features of the file, the second set different from the first set. Some embodiments include comparing results from each decision tree to determine the presence or absence of malware.
1. A computer program product tangibly embodied on non-transient computer readable media, the computer program product comprising instructions operable when executed to:
receive a file from a network location;
extract, by an extraction module implemented at least partially in hardware, a plurality of features of a file;
categorize, by a categorization module implemented at least partially in hardware, each of the plurality of features to define a plurality of categories of features, wherein features unrelated to one another are categorized into a same category to define a category of unrelated features;
build, by a tree generator module implemented at least partially in hardware, a first decision tree based on a first category from the plurality of categories, the first category comprising a set of related features of the file;
build, by the tree generator module, a second decision tree based on a second category from the plurality of categories, the second category comprising a set of unrelated features of the file;
execute, by an execution module implemented at least partially in hardware, the first decision tree to generate a first decision result;
execute, by the execution module, the second decision tree to generate a second decision result; and
determine, by a classification module implemented at least partially in hardware, whether the file has malware based on the first decision result and the second decision result.
2. The computer program product of claim 1 , wherein categorizing each of the plurality of features comprises:
identifying a relationship between each feature of the file; and
identifying one or more categories for the features based on the relationship between each feature.
3. The computer program product of claim 2 , wherein identifying one or more categories for the features based on the relationship between each feature comprises categorizing related features into a same category to define a category of related features.
4. The computer program product of claim 1 , wherein categorizing each of the plurality of features to define a plurality of categories of features comprises associating each feature of the plurality of features of the file with one or more category.
5. The computer program product of claim 4 , wherein categorizing each of the plurality of features to define the plurality of categories of features comprises determining a degree of relation between two of more features of the plurality of features based on a number of overlapping categories associated with each of the two of more features, and
the instructions are further operable to augment, by the tree generator module, the first decision tree with a feature associated with a third category based on the degree of relation between the first category and the third category.
6. The computer program product of claim 1 , the instructions further operable to augment, by the tree generator module, the first decision tree with a feature that is not related to a feature in the set of related features based on the category of unrelated features.
7. The computer program product of claim 1 , the instructions further operable to augment, by the categorization module, one or more predefined categories with one or more features of the file.
8. A computer implemented method for assessing a file for malware, the method comprising:
receiving the file from a network location;
extracting, by extraction logic implemented at least partially in hardware, a plurality of features of the file;
categorizing, by categorization logic implemented at least partially in hardware, each of the plurality of features to define a plurality of categories of features, wherein features unrelated to one another are categorized into a same category to define a category of unrelated features;
building, by tree generator logic implemented at least partially in hardware, a first decision tree based on a first category from the plurality of categories, the first category comprising a set of related features of the file;
building, by the tree generator logic implemented at least partially in hardware, a second decision tree based on a second category from the plurality of categories, the second category comprising a set of unrelated features of the file
executing, by execution logic implemented at least partially in hardware, the first decision tree to generate a first decision result;
executing, by the execution logic implemented at least partially in hardware, the second decision tree to generate a second decision result; and
determining, by classification logic implemented at least partially in hardware, whether the file has malware based on the first decision result and the second decision result.
9. The computer implemented method of claim 8 , wherein categorizing each of the plurality of features comprises:
identifying a relationship between each feature of the file; and
identifying one or more categories for the features based on the relationship between each feature.
10. The computer implemented method of claim 9 , wherein identifying one or more categories for the features based on the relationship between each feature comprises categorizing related features into a same category to define a category of related features.
11. The computer implemented method of claim 8 , wherein categorizing each of the plurality of features to define a plurality of categories of features comprises associating each feature of the plurality of features of the file with one or more category.
12. The computer implemented method of claim 11 , wherein categorizing each of the plurality of features to define the plurality of categories of features comprises determining a degree of relation between two of more features of the plurality of features based on a number of overlapping categories associated with each of the two of more features, and
the instructions are further operable to augment, by the tree generator module, the first decision tree with a feature associated with a third category based on the degree of relation between the first category and the third category.
13. The computer implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising augmenting, by the tree generator logic, the first decision tree with a feature that is not related to a feature in the set of related features based on the category of unrelated features.
14. The computer implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising augmenting, by the tree generator logic, one or more predefined categories with one or more features of the file.
15. A computing device comprising:
extraction logic implemented at least partially in hardware to extract one or more features from a file;
categorization logic implemented at least partially in hardware to categorize each of the plurality of features to define a plurality of categories of features, wherein features unrelated to one another are categorized into a same category to define a category of unrelated features; and
tree generator logic implemented at least partially in hardware to:
generate a first decision tree based on a first category from the plurality of categories, the first category comprising a set of related features of the file, and
generate a second decision tree based on a second category from the plurality of categories, the second category comprising a set of unrelated features of the file;
execution logic implemented at least partially in hardware to:
execute the first decision tree to generate a first decision result, and
execute the second decision tree to generate a second decision result; and
classification logic implemented at least partially in hardware to determine whether the file has malware based on the first decision result and the second decision result.
16. The computing device of claim 15 , wherein the categorization logic is further operable to:
identify a relationship between each of the one or more features of the file; and
identify one or more categories for each of the one or more features based on the relationship between each feature.
17. The computing device of claim 16 , wherein identifying one or more categories for each of the one or more features based on the relationship between each feature comprises categorizing related features into a same category to define a category of related features.
18. The computing device of claim 15 , wherein categorizing each of the plurality of features to define a plurality of categories of features comprises associating each feature of the plurality of features of the file with one or more category.
19. The computing device of claim 15 , wherein the tree generator logic is further operable to augment the first decision tree with a feature that is not related to a feature in the set of related features based on the category of unrelated features.
20. The computing device of claim 15 , wherein categorizing each of the plurality of features to define the plurality of categories of features comprises determining a degree of relation between two or more features of the plurality of features based on a number of overlapping categories associated with each of the two or more features, and
wherein the tree generator logic is further operable to augment the first decision tree with a feature from a third category based on the degree of relation between the first category and the third category.