Granted Patent B2

US 10,284,575 · App. 14/937,802 · Granted May 7, 2019

Abstract

Claims (60)

1. A system for automatically analyzing an object for malware, the system comprising:

one or more hardware processors; and

a memory coupled to the one or more hardware processors, the memory comprises a dynamic analysis engine, a classification engine and a reporting engine, wherein

the dynamic analysis engine, when executed by the one or more hardware processors, generates one or more virtual machines, at least a first virtual machine of the one or more virtual machines includes launcher logic that, upon execution, (i) sets a processing framework for use in configuring a plurality of processes based on a type of object being analyzed and received configuration data identifying a prescribed order of execution of different application and plug-in combinations, (ii) receives information for accessing an object for analysis and parameters associated with the object, and (iii) selects a different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes based on the parameters, wherein the plurality of processes concurrently processing the object within the first virtual machine to produce results comprising information associated with behaviors of the object,

the classification engine classifying the object as part of a potential malicious attack based on the information associated with the behaviors of the object, and

the reporting engine generating an alert signal indicating the potential malicious attack.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the launcher is configured to set the processing framework based on the received configuration data including a priority list, the priority list identifying a selected plug-in ordering for analysis of a selected type and version of the application.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the priority list identifying the selected plug-in ordering based on which plug-in operating with the selected type and version of the application is more frequently targeted for malicious attack.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the different application and plug-in combinations include a different version of a selected application type and a different version of one or more selected plug-in types.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the different application and plug-in combinations include a selected application type and one or more different plug-in types.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the launcher logic reconfigures the processing framework to alter the analysis of the object in accordance with a different application and plug-in combination than previously configured by the launcher logic.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first virtual machine further includes correlation logic operating in combination with the launcher logic, the correlation logic to receive information associated with the object and categorize the object as either a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) or a data type, the object being categorized as the data type in response to a determination that the object includes a selected type of file extension.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the correlation logic provides a file path of the object and an object type parameter that identifies a category of the object to the launcher logic.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of processes, being performed within the first virtual machine, include (1) a first process based on a first application and plug-in combination corresponding to an operating environment of an electronic device targeted to receive the object, (2) a second process based on a second application and plug-in combination that is more vulnerable to a malicious attack, and (3) a third process based on a third application and plug-in combination that is a most fortified application and plug-in combination to detect latest and unknown attacks.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the launcher is configured to set the processing framework based on the received configuration data including a priority list, the priority list identifying a selected plug-in ordering for analysis of a selected type and version of the application, the priority list further comprises an identification of a selected operating system type and version supporting the selected type and version of the application.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of processes, being performed within the first virtual machine, include (1) the first process based on the first application and plug-in combination, and (2) a second process based on a second application and plug-in combination different than the first application and plug-in combination.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the launcher logic to further select, for a second process of the plurality of processes, a second application and plug-in combination different than the first application and plug-in combination.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the launcher logic to select the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes by at least selecting a first version of a first application instance and a first version of a plugin as the first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second version of the first application instance and the first version of the plugin as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the launcher logic to select the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes by at least selecting a first version of a first application instance and a first plugin type as the first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second version of the first application instance and a second plugin type as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the launcher logic to select the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes by at least selecting a first application instance and a first version of a plugin as the first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second application instance and a second version of the plugin as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein the launcher logic to select the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes by at least selecting a first application instance and a first plugin type as the first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second application instance and a second plugin type as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

17. A non-transitory storage medium including software that, when executed by one or more hardware processors, perform operations for automatically analyzing an object for malware, the non-transitory storage medium comprising:

a first software component that, when executed by the one or more hardware processors, generates one or more virtual machines;

a launcher logic of at least a first virtual machine of the one or more virtual machines that, upon execution, (i) sets a processing framework for use in configuring a plurality of processes based on a type of object being analyzed and received configuration data identifying a prescribed order of execution of different application and plug-in combinations, (ii) receives information for accessing an object for analysis and parameters associated with the object, and (iii) selects a different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes based on the parameters, wherein the plurality of processes concurrently processing the object within the first virtual machine to produce results comprising information associated with behaviors of the object;

a classification engine that, upon execution, classifies the object as part of a potential malicious attack based on the information associated with the behaviors of the object; and

the reporting engine that, upon execution, generates an alert signal indicating the potential malicious attack.

18. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the launcher is configured to set the processing framework based on the received configuration data including a priority list, the priority list identifying a selected plug-in ordering for analysis of a selected type and version of the application.

19. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 18 , wherein the priority list identifying the selected plug-in ordering based on which plug-in operating with the selected type is more frequently targeted for malicious attack.

20. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 18 , wherein the different application and plug-in combinations include a different versions of a selected application type and a different versions of one or more selected plug-in types.

21. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 18 , wherein the different application and plug-in combinations include either (i) a different version of a selected application type and a different plug-in types or (ii) a selected application type and a different versions of one or more plug-in types.

22. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 further comprising correlation logic operating in combination with the launcher logic, the correlation logic to receive information associated with the object and categorize the object as either a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) or a data type, the object being categorized as the data type in response to a determination that the object includes a selected type of file extension.

23. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 22 , wherein the correlation logic provides a file path of the object and an object type parameter that identifies a category of the object to the launcher logic.

24. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the plurality of processes concurrently running within the first virtual machine include (1) a first process based on a first application and plug-in combination corresponding to an operating environment of an electronic device targeted to receive the object, (2) a second process based on a second application and plug-in combination that is more vulnerable to a malicious attack, and (3) a third process based on a third application and plug-in combination that is a most fortified application and plug-in combination to detect zero-day attacks.

25. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the launcher is configured to set the processing framework based on the received configuration data including a priority list, the priority list identifying a selected plug-in ordering for analysis of a selected type and version of the application, the priority list further comprises an identification of a selected operating system type and version supporting the selected type and version of the application.

26. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the plurality of processes, being conducted within the first virtual machine, include (1) the first process based on the first application and plug-in combination, and (2) a second process based on a second application and plug-in combination different than the first application and plug-in combination.

27. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the plurality of processes, being conducted within the first virtual machine, include (1) the first process based on the first application and plug-in combination, and (2) a second process based on a second application and plug-in combination different than the first application and plug-in combination.

28. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the launcher to select the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes by at least selecting a first version of a first application instance and a first version of a plugin as a first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second version of the first application instance and the first version of the plugin as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

29. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the launcher to select the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes by at least selecting a first version of a first application instance and a first plugin type as a first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second version of the first application instance and a second plugin type as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

30. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the launcher to select the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes by at least selecting a first application instance and a first version of a plugin as a first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second application instance and a second version of the plugin as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

31. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the launcher to select the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes by at least selecting a first application instance and a first plugin type as a first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second application instance and a second plugin type as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

32. A computerized method for automatically analyzing an object for malware comprising:

running a virtual machine within an electronic device; and

analyzing an object being processing within the virtual machine for malware concurrently by a plurality of processes associated with a processing framework by at least (i) setting the-processing framework for use in configuring plurality of processes based on a type of object being analyzed and received configuration data identifying a prescribed order of execution of different application and plug-in combinations, (ii) receiving information for accessing an object for analysis and parameters associated with the object, and (iii) selecting a different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes based on the parameters, wherein the plurality of processes concurrently processing the object within the virtual machine to produce results comprising information associated with behaviors of the object;

classifying the object as part of a potential malicious attack based on the information associated with the behaviors of the object; and

generating an alert signal indicating the potential malicious attack.

33. The computerized method of claim 32 , wherein the setting of the processing framework being-based on the received configuration data including a priority list, the priority list identifying a selected plug-in ordering for analysis of a selected type and version of the application.

34. The computerized method of claim 33 , wherein the priority list identifying the selected plug-in ordering based on which plug-in operating with the selected type is more frequently targeted for malicious attack.

35. The computerized method of claim 33 , wherein the different application and plug-in combinations include a different versions of a selected application type and a different versions of one or more selected plug-in types.

36. The computerized method of claim 33 , wherein the different application and plug-in combinations include either (i) a different version of a selected application type and a different plug-in types or (ii) a selected application type and a different versions of one or more plug-in types.

37. The computerized method of claim 32 further comprising:

receiving information associated with the object; and

categorizing the object as either a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) or a data type, the object being categorized as the data type in response to a determination that the object includes a selected type of file extension.

38. The computerized method of claim 37 , wherein the categorizing of the object logic being based on a file path of the object and an object type parameter that identifies a category of the object.

39. The computerized method of claim 32 , wherein the plurality of processes include (1) a first process based on a first application and plug-in combination corresponding to an operating environment of an electronic device targeted to receive the object, (2) a second process based on a second application and plug-in combination that is more vulnerable to a malicious attack, and (3) a third process based on a third application and plug-in combination that is a most fortified application and plug-in combination to detect zero-day attacks.

40. The computerized method of claim 32 , wherein the setting of the processing framework being-based on the received configuration data including a priority list, the priority list identifying a selected plug-in ordering for analysis of a selected type and version of the application, the priority list further comprises an identification of a selected operating system type and version supporting the selected type and version of the application.

41. The computerized method of claim 32 , wherein the plurality of processes, being performed within the virtual machine, include (1) the first process based on the first application and plug-in combination, and (2) a second process based on a second application and plug-in combination different than the first application and plug-in combination.

42. The computerized method of claim 32 , wherein the selecting of the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes includes selecting a first version of a first application instance and a first version of a plugin as a first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second version of the first application instance and the first version of the plugin as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

43. The computerized method of claim 32 , wherein the selecting of the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes includes selecting a first version of a first application instance and a first plugin type as a first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second version of the first application instance and a second plugin type as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

44. The computerized method of claim 32 , wherein the selecting of the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes includes selecting a first application instance and a first version of a plugin as a first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second application instance and a second version of the plugin as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

45. The computerized method of claim 32 , wherein the selecting of the different application and plug-in combination for each process of the plurality of processes includes selecting a first application instance and a first plugin type as a first application and plugin combination for a first process of the plurality of processes and a second application instance and a second plugin type as a second application and plugin combination for a second process of the plurality of processes.

Assignments (15)