IP Library Granted Patent US 10,353,038
Granted Patent B2
US 10,353,038 · App. 14/943,496 · Granted Jul 16, 2019

Magnetic resonance method and apparatus for accelerating magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Inventors: David Grodzki (Erlangen, DE); Esther Raithel (Dormitz, DE)
Assignee: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
G01R33/5608A61B5/055G01R33/4828
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,353,038
App. No.
14/943,496
Granted
Jul 16, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a method and apparatus for the examination of a predetermined volume portion of an object with a magnetic resonance (MR) fingerprinting procedure, an MR signal curve for voxels of the volume portion is acquired, and a comparison of the MR signal curve of the respective voxel is made with stored MR signal curves in order to determine the stored MR signal curve that conforms most closely to the MR signal curve, with the result of the comparison then being made available as an output. The comparison with the MR signal curve of the voxel is (initially) performed with a specific number of signal points of the MR signal curve. A quality measure is determined with which the quality of the most closely conforming stored MR signal curves is determined. The performance of the comparison for the respective voxel is repeated if the quality measure is below a predetermined quality threshold value, with the number of signal points being first increased by a difference number.

Claims (43)

1. A method for magnetic resonance (MR) fingerprinting comprising:

operating an MR scanner, while a subject is situated therein, to acquire MR data and generating an MR signal curve for voxels of a volume within the examination subject based on the MR data, the MR signal curve having a predetermined number of signal points;

providing said MR signal curve to a processor and, in said processor, comparing said MR signal curve for a respective voxel with a plurality of stored MR signal curves, to determine a stored MR signal curve, among said plurality of stored MR signal curves, that conforms most closely to the MR signal curve of the respective voxel, by implementing said comparison of said MR signal curve with said plurality of stored MR signal curves only for the predetermined number of signal points;

in said processor, determining a quality measure that designates a quality of said most closely conforming stored MR signal curves;

if said quality measure is below a predetermined quality threshold value, adjusting the MR signal curve by a predetermined difference number and repeating comparison of said MR signal curve of the respective voxel with said plurality of stored MR signal curves and, for each repetition of said comparison, increasing said number of signal points included in the MR signal curve and used in the comparison by the predetermined difference number;

when said quality measure reaches said quality threshold value, making the most closely conforming stored MR signal curve for which said quality measure reaches said quality threshold value available as an electronic signal from said processor; and

determining said quality measure by reconstructing an MR image using respective stored MR signal curves that respectively conform most closely to the MR signal curve for respective voxels of said volume, and calculating an image quality criterion for said reconstructed MR image, and using said image quality criterion as said quality measure.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising determining said image quality criterion as a signal-to-noise ratio of said reconstructed MR image, and using a predetermined signal-to-noise ratio threshold value as said quality threshold value.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising:

subjecting said reconstructed MR image to a sparsifying transformation, thereby obtaining a transformed MR image;

measuring a sparsity of said transformed MR image and using said sparsity as said image quality criterion; and

using a predetermined sparsity threshold value as said quality threshold value.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising:

determining said quality measure as a determination of a degree of conformity between the MR signal curve of a respective voxel and the stored MR signal curve most closely conforming thereto; and

using a predetermined conformity threshold value as said quality threshold value.

5. A method as claimed in claim 4 comprising:

predetermining said difference number by matching said difference number of signal points to at least one of convergence behavior and a data acquisition parameter with which said MR signal curve is acquired for each voxel, said convergence behavior determining how said degree of conformity of the respective voxel corresponds to said conformity threshold value.

6. A method as claimed in claim 4 comprising operating said MR scanner to abort acquisition of said MR signal curve for voxels of said volume as soon as a ratio between a number of voxels for which said degree of conformity is above said conformity threshold value, and a number of voxels for which said most closely conforming stored MR signal curve is above a predetermined ratio threshold value.

7. A method as claimed in claim 4 comprising ceasing performance of said comparison for voxels for which said degree of conformity has already once been determined to be above said conformity threshold value.

8. A method as claimed in claim 4 comprising, in said processor:

determining sets of voxels for which there is an expectation that said comparison will result in a similar degree of conformity;

performing said comparison for only one subset of voxels among said sets; and

also performing said comparison for remaining voxels of said set when a ratio between a number of voxels in the subset for which the degree of conformity is above the threshold value, and a number of voxels in the subset, is above a predetermined further ratio threshold value.

9. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising using only voxels for said comparison for which an MR signal of the acquired MR signal curve thereof is higher than a predetermined noise signal level.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising using only predetermined voxels, among all of said voxels in said volume, for said comparison.

11. A method as claimed in claim 10 comprising predetermining said number of voxels for use in said comparison dependent on a criterion associated with examination of said subject, or dependent on a previously generated MR overview image of the subject.

12. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising using said most closely conforming stored MR signal curve represented in said electronic signal to reconstruct an MR image of the subject and displaying said MR image at a display monitor in communication with said processor, and allowing further acquisition of said MR signal curve from said volume to be aborted dependent on a review of said MR image at said display monitor.

13. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising, at an end of a complete MR signal curve, comparing each voxel again with said stored MR signal curves to determine said most closely conforming stored MR signal curves.

14. A magnetic resonance (MR) apparatus comprising:

an MR scanner;

a control computer configured to operate said MR scanner, while a subject is situated therein, to acquire MR data and to generate an MR signal curve for voxels of a volume within the examination subject based on the MR data, the MR signal curve having a predetermined number of signal points;

a processor provided with said MR signal curve, said processor being configured to compare said MR signal curve for a respective voxel with a plurality of stored MR signal curves, to determine a stored MR signal curve, among said plurality of stored MR signal curves, that conforms most closely to the MR signal curve of the respective voxel, by implementing said comparison of said MR signal curve with said plurality of stored MR signal curves only for the predetermined number of signal points;

said processor being configured to determine a quality measure that designates a quality of said most closely conforming stored MR signal curves;

said processor being configured to, if said quality measure is below a predetermined quality threshold value, adjust the MR signal curve by a predetermined difference number and repeat comparison of said MR signal curve of the respective voxel with said plurality of stored MR signal curves and, for each repetition of said comparison, increase said number of signal points included in the MR signal curve and used in the comparison by a predetermined difference number;

said processor being configured to determine when said quality measure reaches said quality threshold value, and then to make the most closely conforming stored MR signal curve for which said quality measure reaches said quality threshold value available as an electronic signal from said processor; and

said processor being configured to determine said quality measure by reconstructing an MR image using respective stored MR signal curves that respectively conform most closely to the MR signal curve for respective voxels of said volume, and calculating an image quality criterion for said reconstructed MR image, and using said image quality criterion as said quality measure.

15. A non-transitory, computer-readable data storage medium encoded with programming instructions, said storage medium being loaded into a control and evaluation computer of a magnetic resonance (MR) apparatus, comprising an MR scanner, said programming instructions causing said control and evaluation computer to:

operate an MR scanner, while a subject is situated therein, to acquire MR data and to generate an MR signal curve for voxels of a volume within the examination subject based on the MR data, the MR signal curve having a predetermined number of signal points;

compare said MR signal curve for a respective voxel with a plurality of stored MR signal curves, to determine a stored MR signal curve, among said plurality of stored MR signal curves, that conforms most closely to the MR signal curve of the respective voxel, by implementing said comparison of said MR signal curve with said plurality of stored MR signal curves only for the predetermined number of signal points;

determine a quality measure that designates a quality of said most closely conforming stored MR signal curves;

if said quality measure is below a predetermined quality threshold value, adjust the MR signal curve by a predetermined difference number and repeat comparison of said MR signal curve of the respective voxel with said plurality of stored MR signal curves and, for each repetition of said comparison, increase said number of signal points included in the MR signal curve and used in the comparison by a predetermined difference number;

when said quality measure reaches said quality threshold value, make the most closely conforming stored MR signal curve for which said quality measure reaches said quality threshold value available as an electronic signal from said control and evaluation computer; and

determine said quality measure by reconstructing an MR image using respective stored MR signal curves that respectively conform most closely to the MR signal curve for respective voxels of said volume, and calculating an image quality criterion for said reconstructed MR image, and using said image quality criterion as said quality measure.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066267/0346 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2020
From: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 052648/0591 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2016
From: GRODZKI, DAVID; RAITHEL, ESTHER
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 038118/0822 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2014 223 388 · Nov 17, 2014 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20160139227A1 · May 19, 2016