IP Library Granted Patent US 10,003,646
Granted Patent B1
US 10,003,646 · App. 14/977,581 · Granted Jun 19, 2018

Protection status determinations for computing devices

Inventors: William Scott Edwards (San Jose, CA); Teresa Aguilera (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: eFolder, Inc.
H04L67/1095H04L67/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,003,646
App. No.
14/977,581
Granted
Jun 19, 2018
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems, methods, and media that provide backup protection statuses for computing devices are provided herein. Some methods may include determining a backup status for a first computing device, assigning a protection status for the first computing device based upon a comparison of the backup status and a compliance schema for the first computing device, and transmitting the protection status to a monitoring device utilized by an end user.

Claims (37)

1. A method, comprising:

interrogating a replication receiver system to determine a backup status for each of a plurality of computing devices;

assigning a protection status to each of the plurality of computing devices based upon a comparison of the backup status and a compliance schema for the plurality of computing devices, the compliance schema comprising a backup schedule which delineates how often a backup is executed for or from a computing device of the plurality of computing devices based upon at least one of a time-bounded interval between backups, a network-connectivity threshold, and an entitlement capacity;

sorting the plurality of computing devices into groups according to their protection statuses;

generating a graphical user interface that includes one or more lists that comprise the plurality of computing devices which have been sorted according to their protection statuses; and

automatically taking a predetermined action with respect to at least one of the plurality of computing devices in the one or more lists based upon the protection statuses.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the time-bounded threshold defines a maximum period of time in which a backup must be successfully executed before the compliance schema is considered violated.

3. The method according to claim 2 , further comprising generating the compliance schema from user-defined thresholds.

4. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising storing the compliance schema as a template.

5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising generating a graphical user interface which comprises a visual indicator that represents the protection status of at least a portion of the plurality of computing devices.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the backup status comprises any of network connectivity information, backup attempt information, entitlement capacity information, and any combination thereof.

7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising interrogating the replication receiver system to determine the backup status for at least a portion of the plurality of computing devices.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein assigning a protection status is based upon a comparison of the backup status and a compliance schema for the plurality of computing devices, the protection status indicating whether backup services for the plurality of computing devices are being executed in accordance with the compliance schema.

9. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising transmitting the protection status to a monitoring device utilized by an end user to locate and determine an explanation for why one or more of the plurality of computing devices have not been backed up properly.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the predetermined action comprises generating a compliance message and transmitting the compliance message to a monitoring device.

11. A system, comprising:

one or more processors; and

logic encoded in one or more tangible media for execution by the one or more processors and when executed operable to perform operations comprising.

interrogating a replication receiver system to determine a backup status for each of a plurality of computing devices;

assigning a protection status to each of the plurality of computing devices based upon a comparison of the backup status and a compliance schema for the plurality of computing devices, the compliance schema comprising a backup schedule which delineates how often a backup is executed for or from a computing device of the plurality of computing devices based upon at least one of a time-bounded interval between backups, a network-connectivity threshold, and an entitlement capacity;

generating a graphical user interface that includes one or more lists that comprise the plurality of computing devices which have been sorted according to their protection statuses; and

automatically taking a predetermined action with respect to at least one of the plurality of computing devices in the one or more lists based upon the protection statuses.

12. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising applying the compliance schema to the plurality of computing devices.

13. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising applying a custom compliance schema to one or more of the plurality of computing devices.

14. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising transmitting an alert message when the protection status indicates that any of the plurality of computing devices have not been backed up according to the compliance schema.

15. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the time-bounded threshold defines a maximum period of time in which a backup must be successfully executed before the compliance schema is considered violated.

16. The system according to claim 15 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising generating the compliance schema from user-defined thresholds.

17. The system according to claim 15 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising storing the compliance schema as a template.

18. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the predetermined action comprises generating a compliance message and transmitting the compliance message to a monitoring device.

19. A method, comprising:

dynamically modifying, by a replication receiver system, a compliance schema using one or more dynamic thresholds corresponding to computing device workload and network bandwidth availability as detected by the replication receiver system or a filter driver, the compliance schema comprising a backup schedule which delineates how often a backup is executed for or from a computing device of a plurality of computing devices based upon at least one of a time-bounded interval between backups, a network-connectivity threshold, and an entitlement capacity;

assigning the compliance schema for the plurality of computing devices;

obtaining backup information for the plurality of computing devices;

comparing the backup information to the compliance schema;

generating a graphical user interface that includes one or more lists that comprise the plurality of computing devices which have been sorted according to their protection statuses;

generating a compliance message based upon the comparison; and

transmitting the compliance message to a monitoring device.

Assignments (13)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 19, 2025
From: SKYKICK, LLC; EFOLDER, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 070268/0489 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 24, 2024
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FORMERLY MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
To: EFOLDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 068680/0802 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 2, 2022
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: EFOLDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 061634/0623 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 27, 2022
From: EFOLDER, INC.
To: MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 061559/0703 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 8, 2018
From: EFOLDER, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 044563/0633 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2017
From: AXCIENT HOLDINGS, LLC
To: EFOLDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 044370/0412 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2017
From: AXCIENT, INC.
To: AXCI (AN ABC) LLC
Reel/Frame 044367/0507 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2017
From: AXCI (AN ABC) LLC
To: AXCIENT HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 044368/0556 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2017
From: STRUCTURED ALPHA LP
To: AXCIENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 043840/0227 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2017
From: SILVER LAKE WATERMAN FUND, L.P.
To: AXCIENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 043106/0389 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 2, 2017
From: AXCIENT, INC.
To: SILVER LAKE WATERMAN FUND, L.P.
Reel/Frame 042577/0901 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 31, 2017
From: AXCIENT, INC.
To: STRUCTURED ALPHA LP
Reel/Frame 042542/0364 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2016
From: EDWARDS, WILLIAM SCOTT; AGUILERA, TERESA
To: AXCIENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 037496/0150 →
Continuity (1)
Continuation 13789565 · Mar 7, 2013
Cited By (1)
US 12,301,579