Control conflict management in forwarding nodes
View Patent ↗Embodiments of the present invention provide a processing method of a forwarding node. The method includes: receiving, by a forwarding node, a request message sent by a control node, where the request message is used to request to control the forwarding node; determining, by the forwarding node, that a control conflict exists or the control conflict does not exist; and if the control conflict exists, sending, by the forwarding node, a request rejection response message to the control node, so that the control node selects another forwarding node; or if the control conflict does not exist, sending, by the forwarding node, a request acceptance response message to the control node. In the embodiments of the present invention, control conflicts can be avoided.
1. A processing method of a forwarding node, the method comprising:
receiving, by a forwarding node, a request message sent by a control node, wherein the request message is used as a request to set a node type of the forwarding node, wherein the node type is one of a serving gateway type or a data gateway type, and the control node is one of a serving gateway control node (SGW-C) or a packet data network gateway control node (PGW-C);
determining, by the forwarding node, that a control conflict exists or the control conflict does not exist by determining if the node type of the forwarding node has already been set;
if the control conflict exists, sending, by the forwarding node, a request rejection response message to the control node, so that the control node selects another forwarding node; or
if the control conflict does not exist, sending, by the forwarding node, a request acceptance response message to the control node;
wherein determining, by the forwarding node, that a control conflict exists comprises:
when the forwarding node determines that the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by another control node, determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict exists;
wherein when the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by the other control node, determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict exists comprises:
when the forwarding node is controlled by the other control node, and the request message indicates that the control node and the other control node serve a same user, determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict exists; and
wherein the request rejection response message indicates that the control node and the other control node serve a same user.
2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict does not exist comprises:
when the forwarding node determines that the forwarding node has not already been set by another control node, determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict does not exist.
3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict does not exist comprises:
when the forwarding node determines that the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by the other control node, if the control node and the other control node do not serve the same user, determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict does not exist.
4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict does not exist comprises:
determining from the request message, with the forwarding node, if the control node and the other control node can coexist; and
when the control node and the other control node can coexist, determining, by the forwarding node, that the control conflict does not exist.
5. A processing method of a forwarding node, the method comprising:
sending, by a control node, a request message to a forwarding node, wherein the request message is used as a request to set a node type of the forwarding node, wherein the node type is one of a serving gateway type or a data gateway type, and the control node is one of a serving gateway control node (SGW-C) or a packet data network gateway control node (PGW-C);
determining, with the forwarding node, that the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by another control node;
receiving, by the control node, a request rejection response message sent by the forwarding node, wherein the request rejection response message comprises information about the another control node that set the node type of the forwarding node;
determining, by the control node according to the information about the other control node, whether a control conflict exists with the other control node, comprising:
determining whether the control node and the other control node serve a same user;
when the control node and the other control node serve the same user, determining that the control conflict exists between the control node and the other control node, or
when the control node and the other control node do not serve the same user, determining that the control conflict does not exist between the control node and the other control node; and
when the control node determines that the control conflict exists with the other control node, sending, by the control node, the request message to another forwarding node.
6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising:
when the control node determines that the control conflict does not exist with the other control node, sending, by the control node, indication information indicating that the control conflict does not exist between the control node and the other control node to the forwarding node, so that to enable the forwarding node accepts to accept control from the control node.
7. The method according to claim 5 , wherein determining, by the control node according to the information about the other control node, whether a control conflict exists with the other control node comprises:
determining, by the control node according to the information about the other control node, whether the control node and the other control node can coexist; and
if the control node and the other control node cannot coexist, determining that the control conflict exists between the control node and the other control node, or
if the control node and the other control node can coexist, determining that the control conflict does not exist between the control node and the other control node.
8. A forwarding node, comprising:
a network interface, a memory and a processor, wherein the network interface is configured to communicate with another network element; and
wherein the processor invokes an application program physically stored in the memory, to execute one or more instructions to perform the following process:
receiving, by using the network interface, a request message sent by a control node, wherein the request message is used as a request to set a node type of the forwarding node, wherein the node type is one of a serving gateway type or a data gateway type, and the control node is one of a serving gateway control node (SGW-C) or a packet data network gateway control node (PGW-C),
determining that a control conflict exists or the control conflict does not exist by determining if the node type of the forwarding node has already been set,
if the control conflict exists, sending a request rejection response message to the control node by using the network interface, so that the control node selects another forwarding node; or
if the control conflict does not exist, sending a request acceptance response message to the control node by using the network interface;
wherein determining, by the processor, that a control conflict exists comprises:
when the forwarding node determines that the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by another control node, determining, by the processor, that the control conflict exists;
wherein when the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by the other control node, determining, by the processor, that the control conflict exists comprises:
when the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by the other control node, and the control node and the other control node serve a same user, determining, by the processor, that the control conflict exists.
9. The forwarding node according to claim 8 , wherein determining, by the processor, that the control conflict does not exist comprises:
when the forwarding node determines that the node type of the forwarding node has not already been set by another control node, determining, by the processor, that the control conflict does not exist.
10. The forwarding node according to claim 8 , wherein determining, by the processor, that the control conflict does not exist comprises:
when the forwarding node determines that the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by the other control node, if the control node and the other control node do not serve the same user, determining, by the processor, that the control conflict does not exist.
11. The forwarding node according to claim 8 , wherein determining, by the processor, that the control conflict does not exist comprises:
when the forwarding node and the other forwarding node can coexist, determining, by the processor, that the control conflict does not exist.
12. A control node, comprising:
a network interface, a memory and a processor, wherein the network interface is configured to communicate with another network element; and
wherein the processor invokes an application program physically stored in the memory, to execute one or more instructions to perform the following process:
sending a request message to a forwarding node by using the network interface, wherein the request message is used as a request to set a node type of the forwarding node, wherein the node type is one of a serving gateway type or a data gateway type, and the control node is one of a serving gateway control node (SGW-C) or a packet data network gateway control node (PGW-C),
determining, with the forwarding node, that the node type of the forwarding node has already been set by another control node,
receiving, by using the network interface, a request rejection response message sent by the forwarding node, wherein the request rejection response message comprises information about another control node that set the node type of the forwarding node, determining, according to the information about the other control node, whether a control conflict exists with the other control node, comprising:
determining whether the control node and the other control node serve a same user;
when the control node and the other control node serve the same user, determining that the control conflict exists between the control node and the other control node, or
when the control node and the other control node do not serve the same user, determining that the control conflict does not exist between the control node and the other control node; and
when determining that the control conflict exists with the other control node, sending the request message to another forwarding node by using the network interface.
13. The control node according to claim 12 , wherein the processor further executes one or more instructions to perform the following process:
when determining that the control conflict does not exist with the other control node, sending, by using the network interface, indication information indicating that the control conflict does not exist between the control node and the other control node to the forwarding node to enable the forwarding node to accept control from the control node.
14. The control node according to claim 12 , wherein determining, by the processor according to the information about the other control node, whether a control conflict exists with the other control node comprises:
determining, by the processor according to the information about the other control node, whether the control node and the other control node can coexist; and
if the control node and the other control node cannot coexist, determining that the control conflict exists between the control node and the other control node, or
if the control node and the other control node can coexist, determining that the control conflict does not exist between the control node and the other control node.