IP Library Granted Patent US 10,328,636
Granted Patent B2
US 10,328,636 · App. 14/993,546 · Granted Jun 25, 2019

Additive manufacturing quality control systems

Inventors: Kiley J. Versluys (Hartford, CT); Diana Giulietti (Tariffville, CT)
Assignee: Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
B29C64/153B29C64/20B29C64/205B29C64/214B33Y10/00B33Y30/00B33Y50/02B29C64/386
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,328,636
App. No.
14/993,546
Granted
Jun 25, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes receiving torque data of a powder recoater operatively connected to an additive manufacturing system. The torque data includes torque data of the recoater when the recoater traverses a build area. Receiving torque data includes receiving force data from a plurality of load cells, each load cell operatively associated with a blade segment of a recoater blade assembly. The method also includes determining a quality of one or more of an additive manufacturing process and/or product based on the torque data.

Claims (20)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving torque data of a powder recoater operatively connected to an additive manufacturing system, wherein the torque data includes torque data of the recoater when the recoater traverses a build area, wherein receiving torque data includes receiving force data from a plurality of load cells, each load cell operatively associated with a blade segment of a recoater blade assembly; and determining a quality of one or more of an additive manufacturing process and/or product based on the torque data

determining the quality includes comparing the torque data with reference data to determine whether the torque data is within a predetermined range of the reference data,

and causing the power recoater to recoat the build area.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the quality includes determining if a powder recoat on the build area is incomplete.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising one or more of alerting a user and/or prompting the user to recoat the build area.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the quality includes determining if an additively manufactured product in the build area has part swell if a predetermined swell torque is received.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining if an additively manufactured product in the build area has part swell further includes determining if the part swell is recoverable part swell or irrecoverable part swell based on received torque data.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining the quality includes correlating the torque data with recoater location data and/or reference build location data for the additively manufactured product, such that the location of one or more specific additively manufactured products can be determined if the one or more of the additively manufactured products has part swell.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein if the part swell is determined to be recoverable, the method further includes lowering a laser power on and/or at a region of the one or more of the additively manufactured products that have recoverable part swell.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein if the part swell is determined to be irrecoverable, the method further includes alerting a user and/or shutting off a laser power to the additively manufactured products that have irrecoverable part swell.

9. A non-transitory computer readable medium, comprising computer readable instructions for a controller that is configured to control an additive manufacturing process, the computer readable instructions including:

receiving torque data of a powder recoater operatively connected to an additive manufacturing system, wherein the torque data includes torque data of the recoater when the recoater traverses a build area, wherein receiving torque data includes receiving force data from a plurality of load cells, each load cell operatively associated with a blade segment of a recoater blade assembly; and determining a quality of one or more of an additive manufacturing process and/or product based on the torque data,

wherein determining the quality includes comparing the torque data with reference data to determine whether the torque data is within a predetermined range of the reference data;

and causing the powder recoater to recoat the build area.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9 , wherein determining the quality includes determining if a powder recoat on the build area is incomplete.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the computer readable instructions further include one or more of alerting a user and/or prompting the user to recoat the build area.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9 , wherein determining the quality includes determining if an additively manufactured product in the build area has part swell if a predetermined swell torque is received.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein determining if an additively manufactured product in the build area has part swell further includes determining if the part swell is recoverable part swell or irrecoverable part swell based on received torque data.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 , wherein determining the quality includes correlating the torque data with recoater location data and/or reference build location data for the additively manufactured product, such that the location of one or more specific additively manufactured products can be determined if the one or more of the additively manufactured products has part swell.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2016
From: VERSLUYS, KILEY J.; GIULIETTI, DIANA
To: HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 037491/0988 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 14940242 · Nov 13, 2015
Related Publication 20170136695A1 · May 18, 2017
Cited By (1)
US 12,491,563