IP Library Patent Application 15003520
Patent Application
App. No. 15/003,520

HYBRID ARCHITECTURE FOR PROCESSING GRAPH-BASED QUERIES

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/003,520
Abstract

The disclosed embodiments provide a system for processing data. During operation, the system launches a set of child processes for processing queries of a graph database storing a graph, wherein the graph comprises a set of nodes, a set of edges between pairs of nodes in the set of nodes, and a set of predicates. When a query of the graph database is received, the system transmits the query to one or more of the child processes. Next, the system receives a result of the query from the one or more child processes. The system then provides the result in a response to the query.

Claims (77)

1 . A method, comprising:

launching, by a management process executing on a computer system, a set of child processes for processing queries of a graph database storing a graph, wherein the graph comprises a set of nodes, a set of edges between pairs of nodes in the set of nodes, and a set of predicates;

when a query of the graph database is received, processing the query at the management process by:

transmitting the query to one or more of the child processes;

receiving a result of the query from the one or more child processes; and

providing the result in a response to the query.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

monitoring an execution condition associated with a child process in the set of child processes; and

managing, by the management process, execution of the child process based on the monitored execution condition.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein:

the execution condition comprises an execution error in the child process, and

managing execution of the child process comprises:

restarting the child process when the execution error is recoverable; and

terminating the management process and the set of child processes when the execution error is unrecoverable.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein:

the execution condition comprises a resource usage of the child process, and

managing execution of the child process comprises terminating the child process when the resource usage exceeds a resource usage limit for the child process.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the resource usage is associated with at least one of:

a processor;

a memory;

a disk input/output (I/O); and

a processing time.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the result of the query from the one or more child processes comprises:

receiving, from the one or more child processes, an indication that the result is not available from the one or more child processes;

transmitting the query to one or more additional management processes executing on one or more additional computer systems;

receiving one or more subsets of the results from the one or more additional management processes;

providing the one or more subsets of the results to the one or more child processes for aggregating the one or more subsets into the result; and

receiving the aggregated result from the one or more child processes.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the query to the one or more child processes comprises:

identifying a size of the query; and

transmitting the query to a child process with a resource usage limit that accommodates the size.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of child processes comprise:

a write process that executes write requests to the graph database; and

one or more read processes that execute read requests to the graph database.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the management process executes in a first runtime environment, and the child processes execute in a second runtime environment that is separate from the first runtime environment.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the second runtime environment has a higher performance than the first runtime environment.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the first runtime environment has a higher stability than the second runtime environment.

12 . An apparatus, comprising:

one or more processors; and

memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the apparatus to:

launch a set of child processes for processing queries of a graph database storing a graph, wherein the graph comprises a set of nodes, a set of edges between pairs of nodes in the set of nodes, and a set of predicates;

when a query of the graph database is received:

transmit the query to one or more of the child processes;

receive a result of the query from the one or more child processes; and

provide the result in a response to the query.

13 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the memory further stores instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the apparatus to:

execute, by the one or more child processes, the query against the graph database.

14 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the memory further stores instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the apparatus to:

monitor an execution condition associated with a child process in the set of child processes; and

manage execution of the child process based on the monitored execution condition.

15 . The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein:

the execution condition comprises an execution error in the child process, and

managing execution of the child process comprises:

restarting the child process when the execution error is recoverable; and

terminating the set of child processes when the execution error is unrecoverable

16 . The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein:

the execution condition comprises a resource usage of the child process, and

managing execution of the child process comprises terminating the child process when the resource usage exceeds a resource usage limit for the child process.

17 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein receiving the result of the query from the one or more child processes comprises:

receiving, from the one or more child processes, an indication that the result is not available from the one or more child processes;

transmitting the query to on one or more computer systems; and

receiving one or more subsets of the results from the one or more computer systems.

18 . The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein receiving the result of the query from the one or more child processes further comprises:

providing the one or more subsets of the results to the one or more child processes for aggregating the one or more subsets into the result; and

receiving the aggregated result from the one or more child processes.

19 . A system, comprising:

a management module comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the system to:

launch a set of child processes for processing queries of a graph database storing a graph, wherein the graph comprises a set of nodes, a set of edges between pairs of nodes in the set of nodes, and a set of predicates;

when a query of the graph database is received:

transmit the query to one or more of the child processes;

receive a result of the query from the one or more child processes; and

provide the result in a response to the query; and

a processing module comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to execute, by the one or more child processes, the query against the graph database.

20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the non-transitory computer-readable medium of the management module further comprises instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to:

monitor an execution condition associated with a child process in the set of child processes; and

manage execution of the child process based on the monitored execution condition.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2017
From: LINKEDIN CORPORATION
To: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC
Reel/Frame 044746/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 8, 2016
From: CARTER, ANDREW J.; SONG, YONGLING; EHRLICH, JOSHUA D.; AVERBUKH, ROMAN A.; MEYER, SCOTT M.; ZHU, JIAHONG
To: LINKEDIN CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 037924/0502 →