IP Library Granted Patent US 9,998,344
Granted Patent B2
US 9,998,344 · App. 15/019,951 · Granted Jun 12, 2018

Protection status determinations for computing devices

Inventors: William Scott Edwards (San Jose, CA); Teresa Aguilera (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: eFolder, Inc.
H04L43/08G06F11/079G06F11/1461G06F11/3055G06F11/324G06F11/3006G06F2201/81
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,998,344
App. No.
15/019,951
Granted
Jun 12, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, and media that provide backup protection statuses for computing devices are provided herein. Some methods may include determining a backup status for a first computing device, assigning a protection status for the first computing device based upon a comparison of the backup status and a compliance schema for the first computing device, and transmitting the protection status to a monitoring device utilized by an end user.

Claims (42)

1. A method, comprising:

interrogating a replication receiver system to determine a backup status for a first computing device;

assigning a protection status to the first computing device based upon

a comparison of the backup status and a compliance schema for the first computing device, wherein the compliance schema comprises a backup interval for the first computing device based upon at least one of a time-bounded interval between backups,

a network connectivity threshold, an entitlement capacity, and a computing device workload;

monitoring a first computing device workload of the first computing device using a filter driver agent installed on the first computing device;

dynamically adjusting the backup interval when the first computing device workload is increasing or decreasing as detected by the filter driver agent; and

generating a graphical user interface that illustrates the protection status.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the protection status indicating whether backup services for the first computing device are being executed in accordance with the compliance schema.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the time-bounded threshold defines a maximum period of time in which a backup must be successfully executed before the compliance schema is considered violated.

4. The method according to claim 3 , further comprising generating the compliance schema from user-defined thresholds.

5. The method according to claim 4 , further comprising storing the compliance schema as a template.

6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising providing the template to a second client for use with a second computing device, the second client being different from a first client that owns the first computing device.

7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising transmitting the protection status to a monitoring device utilized by an end user to locate and determine an explanation for why the first computing device has not been backed up properly.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the backup status comprises any of network connectivity information, backup attempt information, entitlement capacity information, and any combination thereof.

9. A system, comprising:

one or more processors; and

logic encoded in one or more tangible media for execution by the one or more processors and when executed operable to perform operations comprising:

interrogating a replication receiver system to determine a backup status for a first computing device;

assigning a protection status to the first computing device based upon a comparison of the backup status and a compliance schema for the first computing device, wherein the compliance schema comprises a backup interval for the first computing device based upon at least one of a time-bounded interval between backups, a network-connectivity threshold, an entitlement capacity, and a computing device workload;

monitoring a first computing device workload of the first computing device using a filter driver agent on the first computing device, the filter driver agent being installed in a layer of the operating system of the first computing device and detecting write operations occurring in the operating system;

dynamically adjusting the backup interval when the first computing device workload is increasing or decreasing based on changes in the computing device workload measured by the filter driver agent; and

generating a graphical user interface that illustrates the protection status.

10. The system according to claim 9 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising applying a compliance schema to the first computing device.

11. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising applying a custom compliance schema to the first computing device.

12. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising transmitting an alert message when the protection status indicates that the first computing device has not been backed up according to the compliance schema.

13. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the time-bounded threshold defines a maximum period of time in which a backup must be successfully executed before the compliance schema is considered violated.

14. The system according to claim 13 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising selectively modifying the compliance schema using dynamic thresholds.

15. The system according to claim 14 , wherein the logic when executed is further operable to perform operations comprising storing the compliance schema as a template.

16. The system according to claim 15 , further comprising providing the template to a second client for use with a second computing device, the second client being different from a first client that owns the first computing device.

17. A method, comprising:

interrogating a replication receiver system to determine a backup status for each of a plurality of computing devices;

assigning a protection status to each of the plurality of computing devices based upon a comparison of the backup status for each of the plurality of computing devices and a compliance schema for each of the plurality of computing devices,

wherein the compliance schema comprises a backup interval for each of the plurality of computing devices based upon at least one of a time-bounded interval between backups, a network-connectivity threshold, an entitlement capacity, and a computing device workload, and

wherein if an insufficient amount of backup data is received by the replication receiver system when compared to a backup interval in a compliance schema, a computing device of the plurality of computing devices associated with the insufficient amount of backup data is assigned a protection status of non-compliant;

sorting the plurality of computing devices into groups according to their protection statuses;

generating a graphical user interface that includes one or more lists that comprise the plurality of computing devices which have been sorted according to their protection statuses; and

automatically taking a predetermined action with respect to at least one of the plurality of computing devices in the one or more lists based upon the protection statuses.

18. The method according to claim 17 , wherein the predetermined action comprises:

determining whether or not backup services for the plurality of computing devices are being executed in accordance with the assigned compliance schema established for the plurality of computing devices; and

transmitting alert messages to a monitoring device when the backup services are not being executed in accordance with the assigned compliance schema.

19. The method according to claim 17 , further comprising transmitting the alert message to the monitoring device via at least one of an SMS message and an email.

Assignments (13)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 19, 2025
From: SKYKICK, LLC; EFOLDER, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 070268/0489 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 24, 2024
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FORMERLY MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
To: EFOLDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 068680/0802 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 2, 2022
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: EFOLDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 061634/0623 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 27, 2022
From: EFOLDER, INC.
To: MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 061559/0703 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 8, 2018
From: EFOLDER, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 044563/0633 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2017
From: AXCIENT HOLDINGS, LLC
To: EFOLDER, INC.
Reel/Frame 044370/0412 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2017
From: AXCIENT, INC.
To: AXCI (AN ABC) LLC
Reel/Frame 044367/0507 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2017
From: AXCI (AN ABC) LLC
To: AXCIENT HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 044368/0556 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2017
From: STRUCTURED ALPHA LP
To: AXCIENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 043840/0227 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2017
From: SILVER LAKE WATERMAN FUND, L.P.
To: AXCIENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 043106/0389 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 2, 2017
From: AXCIENT, INC.
To: SILVER LAKE WATERMAN FUND, L.P.
Reel/Frame 042577/0901 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 31, 2017
From: AXCIENT, INC.
To: STRUCTURED ALPHA LP
Reel/Frame 042542/0364 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2016
From: EDWARDS, WILLIAM SCOTT; AGUILERA, TERESA
To: AXCIENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 037970/0326 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13789565 · Mar 7, 2013
Related Publication 20160162349A1 · Jun 9, 2016