IP Library Granted Patent US 10,426,409
Granted Patent B2
US 10,426,409 · App. 15/037,038 · Granted Oct 1, 2019

Method and device for detecting a neural response in a neural measurement

Inventor: Peter Scott Vallack Single (Artarmon, AU)
Assignee: Saluda Medical Pty Ltd
A61B5/7246A61B5/04001A61B5/6846A61B5/7203A61B5/7282A61N1/36071A61N1/36139G06K9/00496A61B2562/046
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,426,409
App. No.
15/037,038
Granted
Oct 1, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for processing a neural measurement obtained in the presence of artifact, in order to detect whether a neural response is present in the neural measurement. A neural measurement is obtained from one or more sense electrodes. The neural measurement is correlated against a filter template, the filter template comprising at least three half cycles of an alternating waveform, amplitude modulated by a window. From an output of the correlating, it is determined whether a neural response is present in the neural measurement.

Claims (162)

1. A method for processing a neural measurement obtained in the presence of artifact, in order to detect whether a neural response is present in the neural measurement, the method comprising:

obtaining a neural measurement from one or more sense electrodes, the neural measurement being obtained in the presence of artifact;

correlating the neural measurement against a filter template, the filter template comprising at least three half cycles of an alternating waveform, amplitude modulated by a window; and

determining from an output of the correlating whether a neural response is present in the neural measurement.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the window comprises a triangular window.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the triangular window is a standard triangular window of length L comprising coefficients w(n) as follows:

For

L

odd

:

w

(

n

)

=

2

n

/

(

L

+

1

)

for

1

n

(

L

+

1

)

/

2

=

2

-

2

n

(

L

+

1

)

for

(

L

+

1

)

/

2

+

1

n

L

For

L

even

:

w

(

n

)

=

(

2

n

-

1

)

/

L

for

1

n

L

/

2

=

2

-

(

2

n

-

1

)

/

L

for

L

/

2

+

1

n

L

.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the triangular window is a Bartlett window in which samples 1 and L are zero.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the window comprises one of a Hanning window, a rectangular window or a Kaiser-Bessel window.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the window comprises one or more basis functions derived from a sinusoidal binomial transform.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the filter template comprises four half-cycles of an alternating waveform.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the filter template comprises half cycles of a sine wave, modified by being amplitude modulated by the window.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the filter template comprises half cycles of a cosine wave, modified by being amplitude modulated by the window.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein only a single point of the correlation is calculated.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the single point of the correlation is calculated at a predefined optimal time delay.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising determining the optimum time delay when a signal to artifact ratio is greater than one, at which a first or single point of the cross-correlation between the neural measurement and the filter template should be produced, by:

at an approximate time delay between the neural response and the filter template, computing real and imaginary parts of the fundamental frequency of the DFT of the neural measurement;

calculating a phase defined by the real and imaginary parts;

relative to a fundamental frequency of the template, calculating the time adjustment needed to change the calculated phase to π/2; and

defining the optimum time delay as being the sum of the approximate time delay and the time adjustment.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the optimum time delay is recalculated prior to every attempted detection of a neural response.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the optimum time delay is recalculated in response to a detected change in the user's posture.

15. An implantable device for processing a neural measurement obtained in the presence of artifact, in order to detect whether a neural response is present in the neural measurement, the device comprising:

measurement circuitry for obtaining a neural measurement from one or more sense electrodes, in the presence of artifact; and

a processor configured to correlate the neural measurement against a filter template, the filter template comprising at least three half cycles of an alternating waveform, amplitude modulated by a window; and the processor further configured to determine from an output of the correlating whether a neural response is present in the neural measurement.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2025
From: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS IV, LP
Reel/Frame 070518/0710 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2021
From: SINGLE, PETER SCOTT VALLACK; KARANTONIS, DEAN MICHAEL
To: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 058284/0786 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 17, 2016
From: SINGLE, PETER SCOTT VALLACK
To: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 038622/0152 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2013904519 · Nov 22, 2013 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20160287182A1 · Oct 6, 2016
Cited By (6)
US 12,285,263 US 12,329,527 US 12,343,147 US 12,369,826 US 12,376,780 US 12,472,349