IP Library Granted Patent US 10,067,086
Granted Patent B2
US 10,067,086 · App. 15/038,192 · Granted Sep 4, 2018

Method for the in-situ recalibration of a comparison electrode incorporated into an electrochemical system

Inventors: Sylvie Genies (Saint Egreve, FR); Melanie Alias (Poligny, FR); Sylvain Leirens (Grenoble, FR); Angel Zhivkov Kirchev (Aix les Bains, FR)
Assignee: RENAULT s.a.s.
G01N27/4163G01N27/301H01M10/48H01M6/5005H01M10/052H01M2010/4271
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,067,086
App. No.
15/038,192
Granted
Sep 4, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method recalibrates in situ a comparison electrode integrated into an electrochemical system. The electrochemical system includes a working electrode, a counter electrode, and an electrolyte. The method includes verifying a potential of the comparison electrode relative to the working electrode or to the counter electrode in situ, detecting whether there is a drift in the potential of the comparison electrode relative to a potential plateau for which the comparison electrode was functionalized or designed, and when the drift is detected, recalibrating the comparison electrode in situ.

Claims (28)

1. A method for recalibrating in situ a comparison electrode integrated into an electrochemical system including a working electrode, a counter electrode, and an electrolyte, the method comprising:

connecting the comparison electrode to the working electrode or the counter electrode;

verifying a potential of the comparison electrode relative to the working electrode or to the counter electrode in situ by

measuring the potential of the comparison electrode, then

applying a verification positive current of a first duration, then

measuring a first variation in the potential of the comparison electrode, then

applying a verification negative current of a second duration, then

measuring a second variation in the potential of the comparison electrode, and then

determining a voltage measurement depending on the first variation in the potential and the second variation in the potential;

detecting whether there is a drift in the potential of the comparison electrode relative to a potential plateau for which the comparison electrode was functionalized or designed when either the first variation in the potential of the comparison electrode or the second variation in the potential of the comparison electrode is greater than a plateau voltage for which the comparison electrode was functionalized or designed increased, for a given temperature, by a shift voltage value; and

when the drift is not detected, reconnecting the comparison electrode to the working electrode or the counter electrode so that the electrochemical system can be charged and discharged,

when the drift is detected, recalibrating the comparison electrode in situ by

applying a recalibration negative current until the first variation in the potential, then

memorizing a potential value obtained by lower bound, then

applying a recalibration positive current until the second variation in the potential, then

memorizing the potential value obtained by upper bound, then

determining a capacity of the comparison electrode depending on the lower bound, the upper bound, and applied currents, and then

determining a state of ageing of the comparison electrode from an initial capacity and the determined capacity, and

when the state of ageing is not above a threshold, applying the negative current to obtain a state of charge, and reconnecting the comparison electrode to the working electrode or the counter electrode so that the electrochemical system can be charge and discharged, and

when the state of ageing is above a threshold, determining that the comparison electrode has failed.

2. The method as claimed in, claim 1 , wherein the shift voltage value is at least equal to 20 mV±5 mV.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the potential of the comparison electrode is verified and drift in the potential of the comparison electrode detected periodically, depending on a time period that has passed since a last functionalization.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the potential of the comparison electrode is verified during a time period consecutive to a complete recharge, no current circulating through the electrochemical system during said time period.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a product of an amplitude of recalibration currents multiplied by a duration of application of recalibration currents is higher than one fifth of a total charge of the comparison electrode.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

limiting intensities of the verification positive current and the first duration so that the product of an amplitude of the verification positive current multiplied by the first duration is between one tenth of the maximum charge of the comparison electrode and the maximum charge of the comparison electrode.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

limiting intensities of the verification negative current and the second duration so that the product of an amplitude of the verification negative current multiplied by the second duration is between one tenth of the maximum charge of the comparison electrode and the maximum charge of the comparison electrode.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 23, 2024
From: RENAULT S.A.S.
To: AMPERE S.A.S.
Reel/Frame 067526/0311 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2016
From: GENIES, SYLVIE; ALIAS, MELANIE; LEIRENS, SYLVAIN; KIRCHEV, ANGEL ZHIVKOV
To: RENAULT S.A.S.
Reel/Frame 039035/0227 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 13 61465 · Nov 21, 2013 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20160290959A1 · Oct 6, 2016