Configuration validation in a mixed node topology
View Patent ↗Techniques for validating configuration changes in a mixed node topology are provided. In one embodiment, a device can identify a link to be removed from a topology comprising a plurality of nodes, where the plurality of nodes includes one or more nodes of a first type and one or more nodes of a second type. The device can then determine whether the removal of the link from the topology would require data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type.
1. A method comprising:
receiving, by a device, a user command to remove a link from a topology comprising a plurality of nodes, the plurality of nodes including one or more nodes of a first type and one or more nodes of a second type;
validating, by the device, whether removal of the link from the topology would cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by a master node of the first type, or whether removal of the link would cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type;
if removal of the link would cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by the master node or cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type, rejecting, by the device, the user command to remove the link from the topology; and
if removal of the link would not cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by the master node and would not cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type, accepting, by the device, the user command to remove the link from the topology.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the topology is a mesh topology.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more nodes of the first type are more capable than the one or more nodes of the second type.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the one or more nodes of the first type support greater port bandwidth, a larger number of ports, or a higher level of security clearance than the one or more nodes of the second type.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the validating comprises:
removing the link from a representation of the topology; and
for each endpoint node located at an endpoint of the link, creating a node set that includes the endpoint node.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the validating further comprises, for the endpoint node:
adding, to the node set, other nodes in the plurality of nodes that are directly linked to the endpoint node in the representation of the topology; and
subsequently to the adding, checking whether the node set includes the master node.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein if the endpoint node is of the second type, the adding comprises adding directly linked nodes that are of the first type or the second type, and
wherein if the endpoint node is of the first type, the adding comprises adding directly linked nodes that are of the first type, without adding any directly linked nodes that are of the second type.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the validating further comprises:
if the node set does not include the master node, repeating the adding and the checking for additional nodes in the node set;
else if the node set includes the master node, returning a first result.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the validating further comprises:
if every node in the node set has been processed and the first result has not been returned, returning a second result.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the user command is rejected if the second result is returned for any endpoint node of the link.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the device is the master node.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein the topology represents a stacking system, and wherein each node in the plurality of nodes corresponds to a stackable switch in the stacking system.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the user command specifies a stacking port or a stacking trunk of a node in the plurality of nodes, and
wherein the link is identified based on the stacking port or the stacking trunk.
14. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon program code executable by a processor, the program code comprising code that causes the processor to:
receive a user command to remove a link from a topology comprising a plurality of nodes, the plurality of nodes including one or more nodes of a first type and one or more nodes of a second type;
validate whether removal of the link from the topology would cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by a master node of the first type, or whether removal of the link would cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type;
if removal of the link would cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by the master node or cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type, reject the user command to remove the link from the topology; and
if removal of the link would not cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by the master node and would not cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type, accept the user command to remove the link from the topology.
15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 wherein the one or more nodes of the first type are more capable than the one or more nodes of the second type.
16. A device comprising:
a processor; and
a non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon program code which, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to:
receive a user command to remove a link from a topology comprising a plurality of nodes, the plurality of nodes including one or more nodes of a first type and one or more nodes of a second type;
validate whether removal of the link from the topology would cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by a master node of the first type, or whether removal of the link would cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type;
if removal of the link would cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by the master node or cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type, reject the user command to remove the link from the topology; and
if removal of the link would not cause one or more nodes in the plurality of nodes to become unreachable by the master node and would not cause data traffic between two nodes of the first type to pass through a node of the second type, accept the user command to remove the link from the topology.
17. The device of claim 16 wherein the one or more nodes of the first type are more capable than the one or more nodes of the second type.