IP Library Granted Patent US 9,571,189
Granted Patent B2
US 9,571,189 · App. 15/061,300 · Granted Feb 14, 2017

In-service monitoring of a fiberoptic network

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,571,189
App. No.
15/061,300
Granted
Feb 14, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

An optical fiber breakage point may be located by coupling to the optical fiber an out-of-band optical test signal modulated at a periodic modulation pattern. A distance to the breakage point may be determined from a difference between modulation patterns of transmitted and received test signals.

Claims (60)

1. A system comprising:

a controller configured to:

determine a magnitude of a returning optical test signal;

determine a modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically swept modulation frequency; and

detect fault information in a fiberoptic link based on a comparison of at least one of:

the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal and a reference magnitude of an optical test signal redirected by a wavelength-selective reflector; or

a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal.

2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a photodetector to detect the returning optical test signal.

3. The system of claim 1 , where the controller is further configured to:

detect, based on the determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal being less than the reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal, that there is a break in the fiberoptic link.

4. The system of claim 1 , where the controller is further configured to:

detect, based on the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal being less than the reference magnitude of the optical test signal, that there is a deterioration in the fiberoptic link.

5. The system of claim 1 , where the wavelength-selective reflector is optically coupled to the fiberoptic link.

6. The system of claim 1 , where

the wavelength-selective reflector is configured to redirect the optical test signal at a first wavelength, and

the first wavelength is a test wavelength.

7. The system of claim 6 , where the wavelength-selective reflector is configured to propagate an information signal, at a second wavelength, to an antenna.

8. The system of claim 1 , where

the returning optical test signal is a first returning optical test signal,

the fiberoptic link is a first fiberoptic link, and

controller is further configured to:

determine a magnitude of a second returning optical test signal;

determine a modulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically swept modulation frequency; and

detect fault information in a second fiberoptic link.

9. The system of claim 8 , where the controller, when detecting the fault information in the second fiberoptic link, is configured to:

detect the fault information in the second fiberoptic link, based on a comparison of at least one of:

the determined magnitude of the second returning optical test signal and the reference magnitude of the optical test signal; or

a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal.

10. The system of claim 1 , where the returning optical test signal is based on a test signal that is modulated at the periodically swept modulation frequency.

11. A method comprising:

determining, by a controller, a magnitude of a returning optical test signal;

determining, by the controller, a modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically swept modulation frequency; and

detecting, by the controller, fault information in a fiberoptic link based on a comparison of at least one of:

the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal and a reference magnitude of an optical test signal redirected by a wavelength-selective reflector; or

a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

detecting the returning optical test signal.

13. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

detecting, based on the determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal being less than the reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal, that there is a break in the fiberoptic link.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

detecting, based on the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal being less than the reference magnitude of the optical test signal, that there is a deterioration in the fiberoptic link.

15. The method of claim 11 , where the wavelength-selective reflector is optically coupled to the fiberoptic link.

16. The method of claim 11 , where

the wavelength-selective reflector is configured to redirect the optical test signal at a first wavelength, and

the first wavelength is a test wavelength.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

propagating an information signal, at a second wavelength, to an antenna.

18. The method of claim 11 , where

the returning optical test signal is a first returning optical test signal,

the fiberoptic link is a first fiberoptic link, and

the method further comprises:

determining a magnitude of a second returning optical test signal;

determining a modulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically swept modulation frequency; and

detecting fault information in a second fiberoptic link.

19. The method of claim 18 , where detecting the fault information in the second fiberoptic link includes:

detecting the fault information in the second fiberoptic link, based on a comparison of at least one of:

the determined magnitude of the second returning optical test signal and the reference magnitude of the optical test signal; or

a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal.

20. The method of claim 11 , where the returning optical test signal is based on a test signal that is modulated at the periodically swept modulation frequency.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2025
From: LUMENTUM OPERATIONS LLC
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 074974/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2019
From: DEUTSCHE AG NEW YORK BRANCH
To: OCLARO FIBER OPTICS, INC.; LUMENTUM OPERATIONS LLC; OCLARO, INC.
Reel/Frame 051287/0556 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 11, 2018
From: LUMENTUM OPERATIONS LLC; OCLARO FIBER OPTICS, INC.; OCLARO, INC.
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047788/0511 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 4, 2016
From: LIN, YUAN; KIM, BRIAN SUNGWAN; PARRY, JOHN
To: JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 037895/0911 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 4, 2016
From: JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
To: LUMENTUM OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 038002/0516 →