METHODS AND DEVICES TO THWART EMAIL DISPLAY NAME IMPERSONATION
A list of known addresses of electronic messages may be maintained, as may be a list of known display names of electronic messages. A list of blacklisted email addresses, which are always assumed to be fraudulent or malicious, may also be maintained. For each electronic message received by a user, it may be determined whether the address or display name looks suspicious; that is, whether the received email appears to impersonate a known email address or a known display name. The user may be warned if a received electronic message is determined to be or may likely be or contain an illegitimate or spoofed address or display name.
1 . A computer-implemented method, comprising:
receiving, by a computing device, an electronic message from a purported known sender over a computer network, the electronic message comprising an address and a display name;
accessing, by the computing device, at least one database of known addresses and known display names and determining whether the address and the display name of the received electronic message match one of the known addresses and known display names, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
quantifying, by the computing device, a similarity of the address and of the display name of the received electronic message to at least one address and to at least one display name, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
determining, by the computing device, the received electronic message to be legitimate when the address and the display name of the received electronic message are determined to match one of the known addresses and known display names, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
flagging, by the computing device, the received electronic message as being suspect:
when either the address or the display name of the received electronic message does not match an address or a display name, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names; and
when the quantified similarity of the address of the received electronic message is greater than a first threshold value or when the quantified similarity of the display name is greater than a second threshold value; and
generating, by the computing device, at least a visual cue on a display of the computing device, when the received electronic message has been flagged as being suspect, to alert a recipient thereof that the flagged electronic message is likely illegitimate.
2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the electronic message comprises an email.
3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein quantifying comprises calculating string metrics of differences between the address of the received electronic message and an address stored in the at least one database of known addresses and of known display names and between the display name of the received electronic message and a display name stored in the at least one database of known addresses and of known display names.
4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein quantifying comprises calculating Levenshtein distances between
the address of the received electronic message and an address stored in the at least one database of known addresses and of known display names; and
between the display name of the received electronic message and a display name stored in the at least one database of known addresses and of known display names.
5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising prompting for a decision confirming the flagged electronic message is suspect or a decision denying that the flagged electronic message is suspect.
6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising dropping the flagged electronic message when the prompted decision is to confirm that the flagged electronic message is suspect and delivering the flagged electronic message when the prompted decision is to deny that the flagged electronic message is suspect.
7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein accessing also accesses a database of blacklisted senders of electronic messages and dropping the received electronic message if the address of the received electronic message matches an entry in the database of blacklisted senders of electronic messages.
8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the display names stored in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names are normalized and wherein the method further comprises normalizing the display name of the electronic message before quantifying.
9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein normalizing further comprises transforming the received display name to at least one of make all lower case, remove all punctuation and diacritical marks, remove bracketed or parenthetical information and extra spaces.
10 . (canceled)
11 . A computing device configured to determine whether a received electronic message is suspect, comprising:
at least one hardware processor;
at least one hardware data storage device coupled to the at least one processor;
a network interface coupled to the at least one processor and to a computer network;
a plurality of processes spawned by said at least one processor, the processes including processing logic for:
receiving an electronic message from a purported known sender over the computer network, the electronic message comprising an address and a display name;
accessing at least one database of known addresses and known display names and determining whether the address and the display name of the received electronic message match one of the known addresses and known display names, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
quantifying a similarity of the address and of the display name of the received electronic message to at least one address and to at least one display name, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
determining the received electronic message to be legitimate when the address and the display name of the received electronic message are determined to match one of the known addresses and known display names, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
flagging the received electronic message as being suspect:
when either the address or the display name of the received electronic message does not match an address or a display name, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names; and
when the quantified similarity of the address of the received electronic message is greater than a first threshold value or when the quantified similarity of the display name is greater than a second threshold value; and
generating at least a visual cue when the received electronic message has been flagged as being suspect, to alert a recipient thereof that the flagged electronic message is likely illegitimate.
12 . The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the electronic message comprises an email.
13 . The computing device of claim 11 , wherein quantifying comprises calculating string metrics of differences between the address of the received electronic message and an address stored in the at least one database of known addresses and of known display names and between the display name of the received electronic message and a display name stored in the at least one database of known addresses and of known display names.
14 . The computing device of claim 11 , wherein quantifying comprises calculating Levenshtein distances between
the address of the received electronic message and an address stored in the at least one database of known addresses and of known display names; and
between the display name of the received electronic message and a display name stored in the at least one database of known addresses and of known display names.
15 . The computing device of claim 11 , further comprising prompting for a decision confirming the flagged electronic message is suspect or a decision denying that the flagged electronic message is suspect.
16 . The computing device of claim 15 , further comprising dropping the flagged electronic message when the prompted decision is to confirm that the flagged electronic message is suspect and delivering the flagged electronic message when the prompted decision is to deny that the flagged electronic message is suspect.
17 . The computing device of claim 11 , wherein accessing also accesses a database of blacklisted senders of electronic messages and dropping the received electronic message if the address of the received electronic message matches an entry in the database of blacklisted senders of electronic messages.
18 . The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the display names stored in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names are normalized and wherein the method further comprises normalizing the display name of the electronic message before quantifying.
19 . The computing device of claim 18 , wherein normalizing further comprises transforming the received display name to at least one of make all lower case, remove all punctuation and diacritical marks, remove bracketed or parenthetical information and extra spaces.
20 . A tangible, non-transitory machine-readable data storage device having data stored thereon representing sequences of instructions which, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to:
receive an electronic message from a purported known sender over a computer network, the electronic message comprising an address and a display name;
access at least one database of known addresses and known display names and determine whether the address and the display name of the received electronic message match one of the known addresses and known display names, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
quantify a similarity of the address and of the display name of the received electronic message to at least one address and to at least one display name, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
determine the received electronic message to be legitimate when the address and the display name of the received electronic message are determined to match one of the known addresses and known display names, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names;
flag the received electronic message as being suspect:
when either the address or the display name of the received electronic message does not match an address or a display name, respectively, in the at least one database of known addresses and known display names; and
when the quantified similarity of the address of the received electronic message is greater than a first threshold value or when the quantified similarity of the display name is greater than a second threshold value; and
generate at least a visual cue when the received electronic message has been flagged as being suspect, to alert a recipient thereof that the flagged electronic message is likely illegitimate.