IP Library Granted Patent US 9,716,722
Granted Patent B2
US 9,716,722 · App. 15/074,705 · Granted Jul 25, 2017

Managing domain name abuse

Inventors: Michael William Young (Toronto, CA); Stephen Van Egmond (Toronto, CA); Greg Aaron (Philadelphia, PA)
Assignee: Afilias PLC
H04L63/1416G06F17/30598H04L41/5083H04L61/2076H04L61/302H04L61/3025H04L63/1408
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,716,722
App. No.
15/074,705
Granted
Jul 25, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for providing an abuse sentry service for responding to domain name abuse is described. The method comprises the following steps. A plurality of disparate abuse feeds is received, each comprising data relating to a subset of potential domain name abuse. Filters are applied to the data to create a custom abuse feed. Data from the custom abuse feed is grouped based on priority levels. For each of the groups, one or more corresponding workflows are executed as a response to the potential domain name abuse. A computer readable medium including instructions for implementing the method is also described.

Claims (21)

1. A method for responding to domain name abuse, which comprises:

obtaining a plurality of disparate abuse feeds from a plurality of service providers, each of the plurality of service providers configured to collect information regarding a subset of potential domain names abuse, each of the plurality of disparate abuse feeds comprising data identifying one or more domain names associated with the subset of potential domain name abuse;

aggregating a selective portion of the data of the plurality of disparate abuse feeds;

applying one or more filters to the aggregated data to create a custom abuse feed;

defining different abuse priority levels for the filtered data of the custom abuse feed;

grouping the filtered data of the custom abuse feed into groups of data based on the defined abuse priority levels of the filtered data;

defining a plurality of customer workflows which comprise a series of actions or events; and

executing one or more workflows as a response to the grouping of filtered data.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the filters are predefined, customized or a combination thereof.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of disparate abuse feeds has an associated reliability level.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the reliability level is assigned by an abuse service generating the abuse feed, a party practicing the method, a trusted third party, or any combination thereof.

5. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for execution by a computing device, which when executed cause the computing device to:

receive a plurality of disparate abuse feeds from a plurality of service providers, each of the plurality of service provides configured to collect information regarding a subset of potential domain name abuse, each of the plurality of disparate abuse feeds comprising data identifying domain names associated with the subset of potential domain name abuse;

aggregate a selective portion of the data of one or more of the plurality of disparate abuse feeds;

apply one or more filters to the aggregated data to create a custom abuse feed;

define different abuse priority levels for the filtered data of the custom abuse feed;

group the filtered data of the custom abuse feed into groups of data based on the defined abuse priority levels of the filtered data; and

execute one or more workflows as a response to the grouping of filtered data.

6. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 5 , wherein the filters are predefined, customized or a combination thereof.

7. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 5 , wherein each of the plurality of disparate abuse feeds has an associated reliability level.

8. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7 , wherein the reliability level is assigned by an abuse service generating the abuse feed, a trusted third party, the abuse sentry service or any combination thereof.

Assignments (5)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 3, 2025
From: AFILIAS LIMITED
To: IDENTITY DIGITAL LIMITED
Reel/Frame 072784/0881 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2021
From: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: AFILIAS LIMITED (F/K/A AFILIAS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY); AFILIAS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED; AFILIAS USA, INC.; 101DOMAIN, INC.
Reel/Frame 054832/0354 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 10, 2020
From: AFILIAS PLC
To: AFILIAS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 054372/0117 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 24, 2017
From: YOUNG, MICHAEL WILLIAM; VAN EGMOND, STEPHEN; AARON, GREG
To: ARCHITELOS
Reel/Frame 043075/0149 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 24, 2017
From: ARCHITELOS, INC.
To: AFILIAS PLC
Reel/Frame 043075/0204 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 14566351 · Dec 10, 2014
Continuation 13416688 · Mar 9, 2012
Related Publication 20160205121A1 · Jul 14, 2016