IP Library Granted Patent US 12,428,171
Granted Patent B2
US 12,428,171 · App. 15/075,098 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Flight control methods for operating close formation flight

Inventors: Sergey V. Frolov (New Providence, NJ); Michael Cyrus (Castle Rock, CO); Allan J. Bruce (Scotch Plains, NJ); John P. Moussouris (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: SUNLIGHT AEROSPACE INC.
B64U10/25B64C23/065B64D43/02G01F1/46G01F9/00G01P5/10G01P5/14G01P5/165B64U2201/102Y02T50/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,428,171
App. No.
15/075,098
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of methods and apparatus for close formation flight are provided herein. In some embodiments, a method of operating aircraft for flight in close formation includes establishing a communication link between a first aircraft and a second aircraft, assigning to at least one of the first aircraft or the second aircraft, via the communication link, initial positions relative to one another in the close formation, providing flight control input for aligning the first and second aircraft in their respective initial positions, tracking, by at least one aircraft in the close formation, at least one vortex-generated by at least one other aircraft in the close formation, and based on the tracking, providing flight control input to adjust a relative position between the first aircraft and the second aircraft.

Claims (37)

1. A method of characterizing airflow for operating aircraft for flight in a close formation, comprising:

establishing a communication link between a first aircraft and a second aircraft;

assigning to at least one of the first aircraft or the second aircraft, via the communication link, initial positions relative to one another in the close formation;

providing flight control input for aligning the first and second aircraft in their respective initial positions;

taking measurements characterizing airflow at the second aircraft and analyzing the measurements for creating at least one computer model for predicting one or more 3D airflow patterns, wherein the first aircraft leads the second aircraft in the close formation and wherein at least one measurement characterizing airflow is derived from a flight control signal applied to one or more control surfaces of at least one of the first aircraft or the second aircraft; and

providing at least one different flight control signal to the one or more control surfaces of at least one of the first aircraft or the second aircraft to adjust a relative position between the first aircraft and the second aircraft based on the predicted one or more 3D airflow patterns.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the flight control input for aligning the first and second aircraft in their respective initial positions is generated automatically at the first and second aircraft, respectively.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurements include at least one of airflow velocity vector, airflow speed, airflow direction, air pressure, air temperature, or an aircraft angle of attack of the second aircraft.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein characterizing airflow further includes collecting airflow measurements, at a third aircraft.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the providing at least one different flight control signal includes changing one of an aircraft heading, altitude, roll, pitch, yaw, thrust or velocity.

6. The method of claim 1 , further including evaluating formation flight parameters and optimizing aircraft positions to maximize formation flight benefits based on the evaluation.

7. The method of claim 1 , further including establishing data exchange network between the aircraft and exchanging telemetry data.

8. The method of claim 1 , further including one of designating roles of leader and follower to aircraft in the close formation, selecting a formation pattern, shape and size for a formation, configuring flight control systems for a formation flight, and configuring payload for formation flight on at least one aircraft.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one created computer model comprises a 3D model.

10. The method of claim 1 , further including navigating the formation as a whole to a destination position by the first aircraft.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurements are also taken by the first aircraft.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the taking measurements further includes:

defining a first target search area relative to the first aircraft;

establishing, for the second aircraft, a dithering flight pattern intersecting with the first target search area;

taking measurements characterizing airflow at the second aircraft during the dithering flight pattern; and

determining a location of one or more 3D airflow patterns by analyzing the measurements taken at the second aircraft.

13. The method of claim 1 , further including:

assigning, to a third aircraft not already flying in close formation with the first aircraft and the second aircraft, an initial position relative to at least one of the first aircraft or the second aircraft;

providing flight control input for aligning the third aircraft in the assigned initial position relative to the first aircraft or the second aircraft;

collecting measurements characterizing airflow, by at least one of the second and the third aircraft, for sensing the at least one 3D airflow pattern; and

based on the collected measurements, providing flight control input to adjust a relative position between at least two of the first, the second and the third aircraft in the close formation.

14. The method of claim 13 , further including establishing a communication link between the third aircraft and at least one of the first aircraft or the second aircraft.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein assignment of an initial position of the third aircraft is transmitted over the communication link between the third aircraft and the first aircraft or the second aircraft.

16. The method of claim 13 , further comprising marking an approximate position of the at least one 3D airflow pattern.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the marking comprises emitting one of a stream of small particulates, ionized gas, radio waves, sound waves, and optical beams along a streamwise direction behind one or more wingtips of aircraft in the close formation.

18. A method of characterizing airflow for operating aircraft in a close formation flight, comprising:

determining initial, relative positions between a first aircraft and a second aircraft;

selecting, for each aircraft, a respective target position within the close formation based on measurements characterizing airflow taken by the second aircraft and analyzing the measurements for creating at least one computer model for predicting one or more 3D airflow patterns, wherein the first aircraft leads the second aircraft in the close formation and wherein at least one measurement characterizing airflow is derived from a flight control signal applied to one or more control surfaces of at least one of the first aircraft or the second aircraft; and

providing at least one different flight control signal to the one or more control surfaces of at least one of the first aircraft or the second aircraft to adjust a relative position between the first aircraft and the second aircraft based on the predicted one or more 3D airflow patterns.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein at least one aircraft is a fixed-wing aircraft.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein at least one aircraft is an unmanned aerial vehicle.

21. The method of claim 18 , wherein at least one aircraft is a manned aircraft.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 23, 2019
From: SUNLIGHT PHOTONICS INC.
To: SUNLIGHT AEROSPACE INC.
Reel/Frame 049263/0897 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 28, 2016
From: FROLOV, SERGEY V.; CYRUS, MICHAEL; BRUCE, ALLAN J.; MOUSSOURIS, JOHN PETER
To: SUNLIGHT PHOTONICS INC.
Reel/Frame 039280/0529 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20170269612A1 · Sep 21, 2017
References Cited (13)
US 8219264B1 · Blake · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9104201B1 · Pillai · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20050230563A1 · Corcoran, III · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060244637A1 · Baranov · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20090173836A1 · Kremeyer · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110282524A1 · Mutuel · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140214243A1 · Whitehead · 2014 [cited by examiner]
Shaw-Ward, Samantha, Sep. 2015, University of Surrey, Effects of boundary layer forcing on wing-tip vortices, p. 57. [cited by examiner]
Gracey, William, Aug. 1958, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930085167.pdf, Technical Note 4351, pp. 1-3 (Year: 1958). [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/075,097, filed Mar. 18, 2016, Frolov et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/076,478, filed Mar. 21, 2016, Frolov et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,781, filed Apr. 7, 2016, Frolov et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,790, filed Apr. 7, 2016, Frolov et al. [cited by applicant]