IP Library Granted Patent US 10,182,361
Granted Patent B1
US 10,182,361 · App. 15/094,877 · Granted Jan 15, 2019

Receiver behavior for uplink multi-user transmission in wireless LAN systems

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,182,361
App. No.
15/094,877
Granted
Jan 15, 2019
Kind
B1
Abstract

A wireless communication device that is receiving a frame may determine whether the frame is an Up-Link Multi-User (UL MU) frame, receive the frame by performing a first procedure when the frame is determined to be the UL MU frame, and receive the frame by performing a second procedure when the frame is not determined to be the UL MU frame. Performing the first procedure may include performing a comparison of contents of a Legacy Signal (L-SIG) field of the frame to expected contents of the L-SIG field, performing a comparison of contents of a Signal A (SIG-A) field of the frame to expected contents of the SIG-A field, or both. The SIG-A field may be a High Efficiency SIG-A (HE-SIG-A) field.

Claims (58)

1. A method implemented by a wireless communication device for receiving a frame, the method comprising:

transmitting, by the wireless communication device, a first frame that solicits an Up-Link Multi-User (UL MU) frame;

determining, by the wireless communication device, whether a second frame the UL MU frame solicited by the first frame;

receiving the second frame by performing a first procedure in response to determining that the second frame is the solicited UL MU frame; and

receiving the second frame by performing a second procedure in response to determining that the second frame is not the solicited UL MU frame,

wherein performing the first procedure includes performing a comparison of contents of a Legacy Signal (L-SIG) field of the second frame to expected contents of the L-SIG field of the second frame, performing a comparison of contents of a Signal A (SIG-A) field of the second frame to expected contents of the SIG-A field of the second frame, or both,

wherein performing the comparison of the contents of the L-SIG field to the expected contents of the L-SIG field includes comparing a value of a LENGTH field of the L-SIG field of the second frame to an expected value of the LENGTH field, comparing a value of a rate field of the L-SIG field of the second frame to an expected value of the rate field, or both, and

wherein performing the comparison of the contents of the SIG-A field to the expected contents of the SIG-A field includes one or more of:

comparing a value of a bandwidth field of the SIG-A field indicating an operating bandwidth to an expected value of the bandwidth field,

comparing a value of a Spatial Reuse field of the SIG-A field indicating a Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) level, an interference level accepted, or a transmission (TX) power to an expected value of the Spatial Reuse field,

comparing a value of a Space Time Block Coding (STBC) field of the SIG-A field indicating whether the second frame applies STBC to an expected value of the STBC field,

comparing a value of a Group Identifier (ID) field of the SIG-A field indicating a group which includes a station related to the second frame to an expected value of the Group ID field,

comparing a value of a Number of Space-Time Streams (NSTS) field of the SIG-A field indicating a number of space-time streams to an expected value of the NSTS field,

comparing a value of a Coding field of the SIG-A field indicating a coding type of the second frame to an expected value of the Coding field,

comparing a value of a Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) field of the SIG-A field indicating a MCS of the second frame to an expected value of the MCS field,

comparing a value of a beamforming field of the SIG-A field indicating if the second frame applies beamforming to an expected value of the beamforming field,

comparing a value of a Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) Duration field of the SIG-A field indicating the remaining time in the current TXOP to an expected value of the TXOP Duration field, and

comparing a value of a Guard Interval (GI) field of the SIG-A field indicting a type of a length of a Cyclic Prefix (CP) of the second frame to an expected value of the GI field.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the second frame to be the solicited UL MU frame when a reception of the second frame by the wireless communication device begins a Short Inter-Frame Space (SIFS) after a completion of the transmission of the first frame.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a validity check of the L-SIG field of the second frame; and

determining whether the second frame is the solicited UL MU frame according to a result of the validity check of the L-SIG field.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a validity check of the SIG-A field of the second frame; and

determining whether the second frame is the solicited UL MU frame according to a result of the validity check of the SIG-A field.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the SIG-A field includes a High Efficiency (HE) Signal A (HE-SIG-A) field.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

wherein the first frame includes an indication of the expected contents of the SIG-A field.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the second frame is the solicited UL MU frame when the contents of the SIG-A field match the expected contents of the SIG-A field; and

determining the second frame is not the solicited UL MU frame when the contents of the SIG-A field are different from the expected contents of the SIG-A field.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

performing a validity check of the L-SIG field of the second frame; and

determining the second frame is a third-party frame when a result of the validity check of the L-SIG field indicates that the contents of the L-SIG field match the expected contents of the L-SIG field and the contents of the SIG-A field are different than the expected contents of the SIG-A field.

9. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

performing a validity check of the L-SIG field of the second frame; and

determining the second frame is a third-party frame when a result of the validity check of the L-SIG field indicates that the contents of the L-SIG field do not match the expected contents of the L-SIG field.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

determining that the second frame is the solicited UL MU frame when i) the result of the validity check of the L-SIG field indicates that the contents of the L-SIG field do not match the expected contents of the L-SIG field, and ii) a length indicated in the second frame is longer than an expected length of the second frame; and

determining that the second frame is the third-party frame when the result of the validity check of the L-SIG field indicates that the contents of the L-SIG field do not match the expected contents of the L-SIG field and a length indicated in the second frame is not longer than an expected length of the second frame.

11. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

determining that the second frame is not the solicited UL MU frame when i) a reception of the second frame by the wireless communication device begins a Short Inter-Frame Space (SIFS) after a completion of the transmission of the trigger first frame, ii) the validity check of the L-SIG field indicates that the contents of the L-SIG field are different than the expected contents of the L-SIG field, and iii) the contents of the SIG-A field are different than the expected contents of the SIG-A field.

12. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

performing a validity check of the L-SIG field of the second frame; and

determining that an error has occurred according to a result of the validity check of the L-SIG field.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that an error has occurred when the contents of the SIG-A field compared during performing the comparison of the contents of the SIG-A field to the expected contents of the SIG-A field are different from the expected contents of the SIG-A field.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a parity check of the L-SIG field of the second frame; and

performing the first procedure when the second frame is determined to be the UL MU frame and a result of the parity check of the L-SIG field indicates a parity error.

15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

indicating, using an indication included in an High Efficiency Signal A (HE-SIG-A) field, that the wireless communication device may perform the first procedure.

16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a comparison of a length indicated in the second frame to an expected length; and

determining whether to wait to an end of a current communication according to a result of the comparison.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second frame is an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) frame.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the L-SIG field of the second frame and the SIG-A field of the second frame are a result of an air combination of a plurality of transmitted frames, the plurality of transmitted frames being respectively transmitted by a plurality of wireless devices.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 8, 2021
From: NEWRACOM, INC.
To: ATLAS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 055517/0548 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2018
From: MOON, SUNGHO; LEE, DAE WON; KWON, YOUNG HOON; NOH, YUJIN
To: NEWRACOM, INC.
Reel/Frame 046868/0152 →
Cited By (9)
US 12,218,795 US 12,219,600 US 12,231,934 US 12,295,031 US 12,301,307 US 12,362,790 US 12,418,915 US 12,471,140 US 12,720,289