IP Library Granted Patent US 11,243,525
Granted Patent B2
US 11,243,525 · App. 15/102,455 · Granted Feb 8, 2022

Forecasting maintenance operations to be applied to an engine

Inventors: Alexandre Anfriani (Alfortville, FR); Julien Alexis Louis Ricordeau (Paris, FR)
Assignee: SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES
G05B23/0283G06Q10/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,243,525
App. No.
15/102,455
Granted
Feb 8, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

There is provided a method of and system for forecasting maintenance operations to be applied to an aircraft engine including a plurality of components monitored by damage counters, each damage counter being limited by a corresponding damage ceiling, the method including simulating consumption of the damage counters by iteratively drawing a series of simulation missions from a learning database; for each iteration, determining an accumulated consumption of each of the damage counters, until at least one damage counter related to a current simulation mission reaches a predetermined value limited by the damage ceiling associated with the damage counter; and applying a maintenance strategy on the current simulation mission to determine maintenance indicators representative of maintenance operations to be planned on the aircraft engine.

Claims (29)

1. A method of forecasting maintenance operations to be applied to an aircraft engine comprising a plurality of components monitored by damage counters, each damage counter being limited by a corresponding damage ceiling, the method comprising:

simulating consumption of said damage counters by iteratively drawing a series of simulation missions from a learning database;

determining, for each drawn simulation mission from the learning database corresponding to an iteration of the simulating, an accumulated consumption of each of said damage counters corresponding to the plurality of components, until at least one damage counter related to a current simulation mission reaches a predetermined value limited by the damage ceiling associated with said damage counter;

associating the accumulated consumption of each of the damage counters corresponding to the plurality of components of the current simulation mission with a maintenance indicator representative of one or more maintenance operations directed to the at least one damage counter that reached the predetermined value in the current simulation mission;

performing the simulating, the determining, and the associating a plurality of times and calculating an average of the accumulated consumption of each of the damage counters corresponding to the plurality of components associated with each maintenance indicator;

for each of different maintenance strategies based on the average accumulated consumption of each of the damage counters associated with each maintenance indicator, determining cost and availability indicators, and determining a compromise indicator as a function of said cost and availability indicators; and

comparing compromise indicators for the different maintenance strategies to select an optimum maintenance strategy.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising defining at least one of the different maintenance strategies by

estimating the accumulated consumption of each damage counter up to a determined number of flights; and

grouping maintenance operations associated with damage counters reaching their damage ceilings.

3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising defining at least one of the different maintenance strategies by comparing the accumulated consumption of the damage counters of said current simulation mission with intermediate thresholds below damage ceilings; and

grouping maintenance operations associated with damage counters reaching said intermediate thresholds.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the learning database includes:

a set of experience missions and consumption of one or more of the damage counters associated with each of said experience missions, and

a predetermined maintenance plan comprising damage ceilings associated with each of the damage counters and corresponding maintenance actions.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the learning database also includes mission indicators including a severity indicator for each mission, a flight duration indicator for each mission, and a mission type indicator.

6. The method according to claim 4 , wherein said series of simulation missions is drawn at random from a subset of the set of experience missions.

7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising updating the learning database.

8. A maintenance forecasting computer system for application to a fleet of aircraft engines by applying the method according to claim 1 .

9. A system for forecasting maintenance operations to be applied to an aircraft engine comprising a plurality of components monitored by damage counters, each damage counter being limited by a corresponding damage ceiling, said system comprising:

circuitry configured to

simulate consumption of said damage counters by iteratively drawing a series of simulation missions from a learning database containing experience missions;

determine, for each drawn simulation mission from the learning database corresponding to an iteration of the simulating, an accumulated consumption of each of said damage counters corresponding to the plurality of components until at least one damage counter related to a current simulation mission reaches a predetermined value limited by the damage ceiling associated with said damage counter;

associate the accumulated consumption of each of the damage counters corresponding to the plurality of components of the current simulation mission with a maintenance indicator representative of one or more maintenance operations directed to the at least one damage counter that reached the predetermined value in the current simulation mission;

perform the simulating, the determining, and the associating a plurality of times and calculating an average of the accumulated consumption of each of the damage counters corresponding to the plurality of components associated with each maintenance indicator;

for each of different maintenance strategies based on the average accumulated consumption of each of the damage counters associated with each maintenance indicator, determine cost and availability indicators and determine a compromise indicator as a function of said cost and availability indicators; and

compare compromise indicators for the different maintenance strategies to select an optimum maintenance strategy.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the availability indicators are calculated as an actual operating time divided by a sum of the actual operating time and an operating time that could have been consumed over a time period during which a module of the aircraft engine is in maintenance.

11. The system according to claim 9 , wherein the availability indicators are calculated as an actual operating time divided by a sum of the actual operating time and an operating time that could have been consumed over a time period during which a module of the aircraft engine is in maintenance.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE COVER SHEET TO REMOVE APPLICATION NOS. 10250419, 10786507, 10786409, 12416418, 12531115, 12996294, 12094637 12416422 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 046479 FRAME 0807. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Aug 24, 2018
From: SNECMA
To: SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES
Reel/Frame 046939/0336 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 23, 2018
From: SNECMA
To: SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES
Reel/Frame 046479/0807 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 7, 2016
From: ANFRIANI, ALEXANDRE; RICORDEAU, JULIEN ALEXIS LOUIS
To: SNECMA
Reel/Frame 038835/0550 →