UPS operation with high converter efficiency
The present invention provides a method for controlling an uninterrupted power supply system comprising multiple converters and a control device, the multiple converters are connected in parallel between a power supply side and a load side of the uninterrupted power supply system, each converter is provided to be individually activated by the control device to provide power from the power supply side to the load side, comprising the steps of determining a system load level at the load side of the uninterruptable power supply system, determining a number of required active converters based on the system load level and a system efficiency depending on the number of active converters, and activating the number of required converters based on the above determination.
1. Method for controlling an uninterrupted power supply system comprising multiple converters and a control device, whereby the multiple converters are connected in parallel between a power supply side and a load side of the uninterrupted power supply system, each converter is provided to be individually activated by the control device to provide power from the power supply side to the load side, comprising the steps of
determining a system load level at the load side of the uninterruptable power supply system,
determining a number of required active converters based on the system load level and a system efficiency depending on the number of active converters, comprising determining the system efficiency depending on the number of active converters and a known converter efficiency depending on a converter load level, and comprising selecting the number of active converters with the highest system efficiency,
the system efficiency being determined by the steps of
determining based on the system load level and the number of active converters a system efficiency,
determining based on the system load level and the number of active converters a system efficiency when one converter is removed and/or when one converter is added, and
determining a highest system efficiency from the determined system efficiency based on the number of active converters as well as the number of active converters when one converter is added and/or when one converter is removed, and
selecting the number of active converters with the highest system efficiency comprising comparing the highest system efficiency with a current system efficiency, and selecting the number of active converters with the highest system efficiency when the highest system efficiency is superior to the current system efficiency together with a pre-defined threshold value comprising a minimum system efficiency gain, and
activating the number of required converters based on the above determination.
2. Method according to claim 1 , wherein
the step of determining the system efficiency depending on the number of active converters and a known converter efficiency depending on a converter load level comprises determining the system efficiency depending on the number of active converters and a known converter efficiency depending on a converter load level for each converter individually and determining the system efficiency depending on the efficiency of each individual converter.
3. Method according to claim 1 , wherein
the method comprises the additional step of providing an efficiency curve or efficiency table for the converters, and
the step of determining based on the system load level and the number of active converters a system efficiency comprises identifying a point of operation on the efficiency curve or the efficiency table and the converter efficiency of this point of operation.
4. Method according to claim 1 , wherein
the step of selecting the number of active converters with the highest system efficiency comprises defining a load band for the system load, and selecting the number of active converters with the highest system efficiency in case the system load is out of the load band.
5. Method according to claim 1 , wherein
the step of determining a number of required active converters based on the system load level and a system efficiency depending on the number of active converters comprises determining the number of required active converters under additional consideration of a mode of operation of the UPS system and a level of redundancy.
6. Method according to preceding claim 5 , wherein
the mode of operation comprises a double conversion mode, also referred to as active mode, where a converter is fully operational, and a line interactive mode, where the load is supported by turning a load current that might contain harmonics into a utility current/source current with reduced harmonics.
7. Method according to claim 1 , wherein
the method comprises the step of maintaining converters, which are not active, in varying states of readiness based on activation times and effect on overall efficiency, whereby the converters maintain a system communication level to receive commands to change their operational state from an active state to a de-activated state with the different states of readiness and vice versa.
8. Method according to preceding claim 7 , wherein
the step of maintaining converters, which are not active, in varying states of readiness comprises:
maintaining converters, which are not active, connected to the power supply side and the load side, whereby the converter is energized and at least partially activated but not contributing to provide power at the load side,
maintaining converters, which are not active, connected to the power supply side and the load side, whereby the converter is energized but deactivated, and
maintaining converters, which are not active, connected to the power supply side and the load side, whereby the converter is not energized.
9. Method according to claim 2 , wherein
the step of determining a number of required active converters based on the system load level and a system efficiency depending on the number of active converters comprises determining the number of required active converters under additional consideration of a mode of operation of the UPS system and a level of redundancy.
10. Method according to claim 3 , wherein
the step of determining a number of required active converters based on the system load level and a system efficiency depending on the number of active converters comprises determining the number of required active converters under additional consideration of a mode of operation of the UPS system and a level of redundancy.
11. Method according to claim 4 , wherein
the step of determining a number of required active converters based on the system load level and a system efficiency depending on the number of active converters comprises determining the number of required active converters under additional consideration of a mode of operation of the UPS system and a level of redundancy.
12. Method according to claim 2 , wherein
the method comprises the step of maintaining converters, which are not active, in varying states of readiness based on activation times and effect on overall efficiency, whereby the converters maintain a system communication level to receive commands to change their operational state from an active state to a de-activated state with the different states of readiness and vice versa.
13. Method according to claim 3 , wherein
the method comprises the step of maintaining converters, which are not active, in varying states of readiness based on activation times and effect on overall efficiency, whereby the converters maintain a system communication level to receive commands to change their operational state from an active state to a de-activated state with the different states of readiness and vice versa.
14. Method according to claim 4 , wherein
the method comprises the step of maintaining converters, which are not active, in varying states of readiness based on activation times and effect on overall efficiency, whereby the converters maintain a system communication level to receive commands to change their operational state from an active state to a de-activated state with the different states of readiness and vice versa.
15. Method according to claim 5 , wherein
the method comprises the step of maintaining converters, which are not active, in varying states of readiness based on activation times and effect on overall efficiency, whereby the converters maintain a system communication level to receive commands to change their operational state from an active state to a de-activated state with the different states of readiness and vice versa.
16. Method according to claim 6 , wherein
the method comprises the step of maintaining converters, which are not active, in varying states of readiness based on activation times and effect on overall efficiency, whereby the converters maintain a system communication level to receive commands to change their operational state from an active state to a de-activated state with the different states of readiness and vice versa.