IP Library Granted Patent US 10,713,367
Granted Patent B2
US 10,713,367 · App. 15/155,323 · Granted Jul 14, 2020

Secure electronic mail system

Inventors: Thierry LeVasseur (Vancouver, CA); Esteban Astudillo (Vancouver, CA); Matt McLean (Vancouver, CA)
Assignee: AppRiver Canada ULC
G06F21/602G06F21/60G06Q10/107H04L9/3213H04L9/3247H04L9/3263H04L51/00H04L51/12H04L51/14H04L51/18H04L51/22H04L51/34H04L51/36H04L63/0428H04L63/08H04L63/12H04L63/123H04L63/126H04L63/145H04L63/306H04L51/02H04L63/168H04L67/02H04L2209/56H04L2209/60H04L2209/68H04L2209/80
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,713,367
App. No.
15/155,323
Granted
Jul 14, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

An e-mail system is disclosed that overcomes many deficiencies of, but is backward compatible with, existing e-mail systems. Embodiments of the system may include various features, including but not limited to: (1) secure transfer of e-mail messages, without the need for users to replace existing e-mail clients or to change e-mail addresses; (2) tracking of all actions performed in connection with an e-mail transmission; (3) the ability for a recipient to view information about an e-mail message, optionally including information about how other addressees have responded to it, before deciding whether to retrieve the e-mail message; (4) the aggregation of entire e-mail conversations into a single threaded view; (5) the ability to include both private and public messages in a single e-mail communication; (6) sender control over downstream actions performed in connection with an e-mail message; (7) flexible control over cryptographic methods used to encrypt emails messages for storage.

Claims (15)

1. A computer-implemented method of securely communicating e-mail messages, comprising:

receiving, from a server system providing a secure e-mail service, an e-mail message from a sender;

receiving, from a user, an input to either forward or reply to the e-mail message;

providing data corresponding to the user input to the server system;

receiving a determination, by the server system, whether the user input comprises a request to forward or reply to the e-mail message via the secure e-mail service; and

receiving a determination, by the server system, whether the user input comprises a request to forward or reply to the e-mail message via an e-mail service different from the secure e-mail service, the different e-mail service lacking security features of the secure e-mail service, wherein

based on a determination that the user input comprises a request to forward or reply to the e-mail message via the secure e-mail service, the server system proceeds with forwarding or replying to the e-mail message; and

based on a determination that the user input comprises a request to forward or reply to the e-mail message via the different e-mail service, when enforcing a service-level option, the server system prevents the forwarding or replying via the different e-mail service and allows the forward or reply to the e-mail message to be sent via the secure e-mail service; and

based on a determination that the user input comprises a request to forward or reply to the e-mail message via the different e-mail service, when not enforcing the service-level option, the server system notifies the sender that the security features of the secure-email service will be lost and sends the forward or reply to the e-mail message via the different e-mail service.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the secure e-mail service comprises a private e-mail network.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein preventing the forwarding or replying via the different e-mail service comprises automatically forwarding or replying via the secure e-mail service.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein preventing the forwarding or replying via the different e-mail service further comprises selecting a graphical user interface element representing the secure e-mail service, and further comprises preventing user selection of a graphical user interface element representing the different e-mail service.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein both the graphical user interface element representing the secure e-mail service and the graphical user interface element representing the unsecured e-mail service comprise a checkbox.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein preventing the forwarding or replying via the unsecured e-mail service further comprises, upon receiving a user input to deselect the graphical user interface element representing the secure e-mail service, providing a message to the user indicating the user input is not allowed.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein preventing the forwarding or replying via the different e-mail service further comprises disabling the copy/paste functionality of an e-mail reading window.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 30, 2019
From: APPRIVER CANADA INC.
To: APPRIVER CANADA ULC
Reel/Frame 050866/0493 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2019
From: CIRIUS MESSAGING INC.
To: APPRIVER CANADA INC.
Reel/Frame 049320/0102 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 16, 2016
From: LEVASSEUR, THIERRY; MCLEAN, MATT; ASTUDILLO, ESTEBAN
To: CIRIUS MESSAGING INC.
Reel/Frame 038602/0401 →
Continuity (4)
Division 14135842 · Dec 20, 2013
Continuation 11427912 · Jun 30, 2006
Provisional Application 60696300 · Jul 1, 2005
Related Publication 20160261536A1 · Sep 8, 2016