IP Library Granted Patent US 9,889,301
Granted Patent B2
US 9,889,301 · App. 15/195,646 · Granted Feb 13, 2018

Hybrid fitting for a visual prosthesis

Inventors: Jessy D Dorn (Los Angeles, CA); Arup Roy (Valencia, CA); Robert J Greenberg (Los Angeles, CA); Avraham I Caspi (Rehovot, IL)
Assignee: Second Sight Medical Products, Inc.
A61N1/36046A61N1/0543A61N1/37241A61N1/37247A61N1/37252
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,889,301
App. No.
15/195,646
Granted
Feb 13, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention is an improved fitting and training system for a visual prosthesis. Fitting a visual prosthesis through automated means is challenging and fitting a visual prosthesis manually is tedious for clinician and patent, and provides great opportunity for error. A hybrid of computer controlled and manual fitting provides effective, efficient and controlled fitting process. The process includes testing a group of electrodes in random order by providing a prompt followed by stimulation and the patient responding if they saw a percept. After each set, a maximum likelihood algorithm is used to determine the next stimulation level, or if further stimulation is needed for each electrode.

Claims (58)

1. A method of brightness fitting for a visual prosthesis comprising:

a. providing an external video processor and an implantable visual neural stimulator including an array of electrodes suitable to contact visual neural tissue;

b. testing the implantable visual neural stimulator to verify function and matching to the external video processor;

c. activating a prompt;

d. activating signals at varying levels on a selected electrode within a subset of electrodes in the array of electrodes;

e. receiving a response from a subject indicating a visual perception;

f. recording the level that elicited the response indicating the visual perception;

g. repeating the steps c through f for each electrode in the subset;

h. determining if a predetermined minimum number of electrodes in the subset elicited responses indicating visual perceptions;

i. if the predetermined minimum number of electrodes did not elicit responses indicating the visual perceptions, activating the subset of electrodes in the array of electrodes simultaneously as a group at varying levels;

j. receiving a subset response from a subject indicating a subset visual perception; and

k. recording the level that elicited the subset response indicating the subset visual perception from stimulating the subset of electrodes.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the subset of electrodes includes four electrodes.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of activating a signal includes activating no signal at a pseudorandom interval.

4. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising generating a video configuration file from results of the steps of recording responses indicating visual perception.

5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising after each response applying a predetermined computer algorithm to determine a next activation level for each selected electrode.

6. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the predetermined algorithm predicts a confidence of a correct answer based upon a consistency of previous answers.

7. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the predetermined algorithm is a maximum likelihood algorithm.

8. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the predetermined algorithm is according to the equation

L

i

=

q

=

1

m

(

p

q

,

i

)

n

yes

,

q

·

(

1

-

p

q

,

i

)

n

no

,

q

Where:

L i is the likelihood that the threshold value is at level i

P q,i is the probability, according to the Psychometric Function, that the patient will perceive a stimulation at level q given that the threshold is at level i

n yes, q is the number of Yes responses in all previous presentations (trials) at level q

n no, q is the number of No responses in all previous presentations (trials) at level q

m is the number of levels in the range-the highest level.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 3, 2023
From: VIVANI MEDICAL, INC.
To: CORTIGENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 062589/0523 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 27, 2022
From: SECOND SIGHT MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.; VIVANI MEDICAL, INC.
To: VIVANI MEDICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 062230/0479 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2016
From: DORN, JESSY; GREENBERG, ROBERT J.; ROY, ARUP; CASPI, AVRAHAM
To: SECOND SIGHT MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 039033/0691 →
Continuity (3)
Division 14752507 · Jun 26, 2015
Division 13573770 · Oct 3, 2012
Related Publication 20160303373A1 · Oct 20, 2016