IP Library Patent Application 15195866
Patent Application
App. No. 15/195,866

PREDICTING CUSTOMER PURCHASE BEHAVIOR FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/195,866
Abstract

The disclosed embodiments provide a system for processing data. During operation, the system obtains a set of features for a customer of an educational technology product. Next, the system uses the set of features to calculate an overall score representing a predicted purchase behavior of the customer with the educational technology product. The system then uses multiple subsets of the features to calculate a set of sub-scores that characterize different components of the overall score. Finally, the system outputs the overall score and the sub-scores for use in managing sales activity with the customer.

Claims (68)

1 . A method, comprising:

obtaining a set of features for a customer of an educational technology product;

using the set of features to calculate, by one or more computer systems, an overall score representing a predicted purchase behavior of the customer with the educational technology product;

using multiple subsets of the features to calculate, by the one or more computer systems, a set of sub-scores that characterize different components of the overall score; and

outputting the overall score and the sub-scores for use in managing sales activity with the customer.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein using the set of features to calculate the overall score comprises:

applying a joint model to the features to produce multiple values of the overall score; and

combining the multiple values into a final value of the overall score.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the joint model comprises:

a random forest; and

a gradient-boosted tree.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein using multiple subsets of the features to calculate the set of sub-scores for characterizing different components of the overall score comprises:

for each sub-score in the sub-scores, using a different statistical model to calculate the sub-score from a different subset of the features.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein using multiple subsets of the features to calculate the set of sub-scores for characterizing different components of the overall score further comprises:

iteratively adjusting one or more of the sub-scores until a sum of the sub-scores equals the overall score.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sub-scores comprise a similarity score representing a demographic similarity of the customer to existing customers of the educational technology product.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein a subset of the features for calculating the similarity score comprises:

a company characteristic;

a potential spending; and

a company statistic.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sub-scores comprise an engagement score representing a similarity in engagement with an online professional network between the customer and existing customers of the educational technology product.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein a subset of the features for calculating the engagement score comprises:

a number of visits to the online professional network;

a number of members of the online professional network;

a number of connections within the online professional network; and

a previous purchase behavior of the customer with one or more other products associated with the online professional network.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sub-scores comprise a learning culture score representing a similarity in learning culture between the customer and existing customers of the educational technology product.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein a subset of the features for calculating the learning culture score comprises:

a connectedness to educational technology entities in an online professional network;

a number of members with skills listed on the online professional network;

a number of learning decision makers; and

a number of e-learning certificates.

12 . An apparatus, comprising:

one or more processors; and

memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the apparatus to:

obtain a set of features for a customer of an educational technology product;

use the set of features to calculate an overall score representing a predicted purchase behavior of the customer with the educational technology product;

use multiple subsets of the features to calculate a set of sub-scores that characterize different components of the overall score; and

output the overall score and the sub-scores for use in managing sales activity with the customer.

13 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein using the set of features to calculate the overall score comprises:

applying a joint model to the features to produce multiple values of the overall score; and

combining the multiple values into a final value of the overall score.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the joint model comprises:

a random forest; and

a gradient-boosted tree.

15 . The system of claim 12 , wherein using multiple subsets of the features to calculate the set of sub-scores for characterizing different components of the overall score comprises at least one of:

for each sub-score in the sub-scores, using a different statistical model to calculate the sub-score from a different subset of the features; and

iteratively adjusting one or more of the sub-scores until a sum of the sub-scores equals the overall score.

16 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the sub-scores comprise:

a similarity score representing a demographic similarity of the customer to existing customers of the educational technology product;

an engagement score representing a similarity in engagement with an online professional network between the customer and the existing customers; and

a learning culture score representing a similarity in learning culture between the customer and the existing customers.

17 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the memory further stores instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the apparatus to:

use the set of features to calculate a potential spending of the customer with the educational technology product; and

output the potential spending with the sub-scores and the overall score.

18 . A system, comprising:

an analysis module comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed, cause the system to:

obtain a set of features for a customer of an educational technology product;

use the set of features to calculate an overall score representing a predicted purchase behavior of the customer with the educational technology product;

use multiple subsets of the features to calculate a set of sub-scores that characterize different components of the overall score; and

a management module comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed, cause the system to output the overall score and the sub-scores for use in managing sales activity with the customer.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the sub-scores comprise:

a similarity score representing a demographic similarity of the customer to existing customers of the educational technology product;

an engagement score representing a similarity in engagement with an online professional network between the customer and the existing customers; and

a learning culture score representing a similarity in learning culture between the customer and the existing customers

20 . The system of claim 18 , wherein using the set of features to calculate the overall score comprises:

applying a joint model to the features to produce multiple values of the overall score; and

combining the multiple values into a final value of the overall score.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2017
From: LINKEDIN CORPORATION
To: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC
Reel/Frame 044746/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2016
From: HAN, ZHAOYING; KING III, COLEMAN PATRICK; DI, WEI; WANG, JUAN
To: LINKEDIN CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 039160/0975 →